There is a kind of writing that is self-amusing and self-congratulatory writing, there is no framework, there is no logic, the writer writes wherever he goes, and even the writer himself may not know itself, insisting, thinking that according to the law of ten thousand hours, as long as the ten thousand hours are adhered to, it will certainly be successful.
Is this 10,000 hours really without thinking, and a simple repetition of the operation of 10,000 hours is feasible?
I have a suspicious attitude. After all, the repetition of simple machinery is not conducive to growth. For writing, without repeated study of various works, thoughtful speculation, it is impossible to gain knowledge.
It's like cooking. Repeating three meals a day over the same day, even if you do it for ten years, you will not become a good chef.
To become a good writer or chef, in addition to the ten thousand hours of persistence, is to dissect all kinds of good works. Why is it written? If it were me, how would I go down.
To go beyond the identity of the reader, to have a profound exchange with the work as an outsider.
So don't repeat the 10,000 hours of simple machinery anymore.
We must persist, we must act, and we must think more.
The above is encouraged.
