When it comes to Station B, I don't know what the first impression of everyone is?
Today, when the tentacles of big data reach out to every user, this answer may be thousands of faces.
After all, each user likes to watch different types of videos, and the videos they see on the recommendation page will be different.
As an annual big member + loyal user, Xiao Lei first talked about his impression of Station B:
The first is that there are many high-quality videos, and the user atmosphere is relatively nice, and it will not be like Weibo.
The bullet screen is also only played real, there is no water arms control review in the comment area, coupled with the video playback without advertising, the experience of watching the film at station B is really beautiful.
However, Xiao Lei believes that what he likes most about station B is that its overall atmosphere is loose and comfortable enough.
That said, the scope may be a bit large, mainly because the scale of video review is relatively loose.
Station B has a rich variety of video types, from simple secondary editing short videos to tens of minutes of knowledge videos, which are basically what to meet the strange needs of young people.
If you open the B station only to be happy, then the dance area and the fitness area can be seen together, and everyone who understands it understands it.
In most cases, the relaxation of the review has a significant "gain" on the content richness of the platform, and all the old site friends should feel the same.
But as the saying goes, I often walk by the river where there are shoes that don't get wet.
Xiao Lei brushed Weibo last night and saw that station B was the first hot search by netizens because it allowed users to upload some kind of video.
Hot search is clear enough, some users uploaded some surveillance screen videos to station B.
Xiao Lei took a brief glance and found that these monitoring scenes are very rich, including classrooms where students are seriously attending classes, as well as hotel front desks and hospital dispensing rooms.
Source: Elephant News
There are many more scenes that have not been disclosed from the news, but as a surf veteran, Xiao Lei can guess the uploaders of these videos, and must be holding a lot of unsavory surveillance footage.
For example, surveillance footage in the home room and camera recording footage secretly arranged by some hotels.
However, these videos involve personal privacy and illegality, and will definitely be rejected by Station B.
Those videos with normal scale are easy to pass the review and be uploaded to the B station for users to watch.
As for why I would say that those video uploaders have more strong material, you can find out about these surveillance scenes.
Classrooms, hotel front desks and hospital monitoring screens, which are free for us ordinary people to see ah, generally only insiders and police have the right to call.
So, combined with the surveillance screen sent by the video uploader, these videos are most likely cracked by illegal means.
This group of black workers has superior technical ability and can easily crack various smart cameras on the market.
At this point, the video in various sensitive surveillance scenarios is bound to be easily taken down by them.
As for the black producers, we will talk about them later.
Before that, we still have to clear up the matter of the B station audit.
From God's point of view, this kind of cracked uploaded surveillance screen was approved, which is indeed outrageous.
Most netizens also have the same view: Isn't this the problem of your B station? Can this kind of video also pass the review? The auditors are on the line, right?
Yes, if you look at the results, station B to review this kind of video is definitely wrong.
But have you ever thought about the fundamental reason why this kind of video can pass the review?
Xiao Lei thought about it carefully, these surveillance videos can pass the review, first, because there is no violation of the occasion, like classrooms and hotel front desks are very normal public places.
Even if we don't watch the surveillance video, we can see what the people inside are doing when we pass by.
Second, from the content point of view, the people who were filmed by the surveillance did not do dirty things, and the scale was not excessive at all.
Combined with the above two points, the B station reviewer passed such a video is actually no problem.
For example, Xiao Lei passed by a barbecue stall, felt that this stall was decorated very well, and recorded a portrait, and then uploaded it to the B station, with a high probability that it would be reviewed.
For example, some time ago, it was not very popular "cloud supervision", in fact, it is a live broadcast of the construction process of workers.
This scene also belongs to "monitoring", but people are not illegal, and they can't permanently ban similar live broadcasts because of the B station after this matter comes out...
So, the root cause of the problem is that the source of the video is unknown.
This should be a big problem for every video platform, no matter how powerful the B station review, it is difficult to dig out the true source of each video.
Even if it can be done technically, with tens of thousands of video uploads per day on station B, I am afraid that it is not necessary to completely squeeze out the review brother.
At least the platform handled and responded quickly enough on this matter, and not long after receiving the report, it removed the relevant video and banned the upload of the account.
The small broken station also made it very clear that this kind of cracking and stealing surveillance video is illegal and was found to be arrested and imprisoned.
So the question is, the people who crack these surveillance should also know the consequences of their actions, why should they take risks and engage in this kind of black intention?
This estimate is understood by everyone, or the profit is too high, and it is not too much to describe it as a huge profit.
Take these UP owners, they basically have women in the surveillance footage they transmit, in order to attract the target group to pay.
As long as the video upload is successful, drainage is not a difficult task, as long as you write "+V to get other videos" in the introduction or comment area, waiting for customers to come to the door to pay money.
As for what paid surveillance video is, everyone understands it.
In intimate occasions such as hotels, homestays and fitting rooms, just a miniature camera is needed to capture the whole process of men's and women's battles.
Even if you are in your home, as long as there are surveillance cameras installed in your home, you may be invaded by black workers and take extremely exciting private pictures.
Your battle process has become a money-making tool for these black brothers, and in terms of a single video, it can generally be bought for dozens of dollars.
If the buyer is not satisfied with the video and wants to pursue more exciting operations, the buyer will move out of the "real-time monitoring" package, allowing the buyer to monitor the life under the roof of others 24 hours a day.
The price of this type of service varies, and the actual price is not expensive, such as monitoring three rooms is 400 yuan / month, Liu room is 500 yuan / month, eight rooms are 650 yuan / month.
After the buyer pays, the seller will provide the corresponding app to use.
Several large rooms can be switched freely, and 24-hour real-time viewing of other people's lives is like the live-action version of "Truman's World".
Xiao Lei went to pick it up and found that there were too many black production businesses, and it was too difficult to completely eliminate it.
Even if the official efforts to crack down on pinhole cameras now, those ordinary home monitoring is still a major hidden danger of privacy leakage.
Like the surveillance video of the B station this time, the high probability is that the civilian camera is cracked and leaked.
What Yunshitong, 360 surveillance and Le Orange, are the more well-known surveillance camera brands in the industry.
It is not that the security capabilities of these cameras are not good, part of the reason is because many people buy a smart camera back, and strictly do not change the default password.
As for the default login account and password, that is too good to guess, the account is generally "admin"-based, all kinds of smart appliances, and even Windows are used.
In order to facilitate the user, the manufacturer generally does not set it too complicated, leaving an invading backdoor for the black brother.
Account number: admin
Password: 123456, 88888888...
In this current situation, Xiao Lei feels that the home type of smart camera is not safe, and with the hacker's technology, it is really not difficult to invade.
All we can do is turn off the camera when we get home and turn it on only before we go out to monitor the situation at home.
We can't change the environment, we can only improve our own vigilance.