laitimes

Taking stock of tyrants in history, are they really doing nothing?

When it comes to tyrants, the first word that comes to mind is probably the king of the subjugated country, which means that the state will perish because of its absurd and unscrupulous behavior. From the beginning of the slave dynasty, Xia Jie Shang Zhou You and others were the kings of the fallen country, and the three of them had a common feature that was that because of the beauty that eventually led to the demise of the country. Whether it is Xia Jie's sister Xi, Shang Yi's concubine, or Zhou You's praise will always make people regret. Among them, the most regrettable is the King of Shang, who also has a certain historical contribution to the Shang Dynasty, the most typical is to open up the territory and expand the territory, the Eastern Expedition to the East, but later by the King of Zhou Wu saw the opportunity, and finally the army drummed up until the song, the Shang Dynasty perished.

Taking stock of tyrants in history, are they really doing nothing?

?? There are tyrants, mediocre kings and even dark kings. After talking about the slave dynasty, let's talk about the Qin Dynasty, everyone knows that the last emperor of the Qin Dynasty was a child, because its reign time was only one month and was often not recognized by history. The real culprit that led to the demise of the Qin Dynasty was Hu Hai, the second Qin Emperor, who favored the eunuch Zhao Gao during his reign, and the traitorous ministers caused chaos in the government, and loyal ministers such as Li Simengtian were killed by them. Hu Hai himself also drank and played all day, originally from the Qin Shi Huang period due to the serious taxation, the people could not afford to add Qin II such a toss, which caused anger and resentment. In the end, Chen Sheng's Wu Guangzexiang uprising shook the rule of the Qin Dynasty. In the end, Liu Bang led an army into Xianyang, and the Qin Dynasty fell.

The Qin Dynasty was followed by the Han Dynasty, and the Han Dynasty, as a prosperous dynasty in history, basically the first five generations of Ming Jun, so there was the capital of the Later Emperor Wudi of the Han Dynasty to expedition against the Xiongnu. Even the last emperor, whether it was the Western Han or the Eastern Han Dynasty, was only a philistine and did not have so much influence on the imperial court.

Taking stock of tyrants in history, are they really doing nothing?

?? After the Han Dynasty, the Three Kingdoms, and finally unified by Emperor Wu of Jin, the Jin Dynasty can be described as the worst dynasty in Chinese history, there is no one, there is a saying that there is no Ming Jun, even the founding emperor Sima Yan, only in the early days of the founding of the country to implement the rule of Taikang. After destroying Eastern Wu, he could not do it, felt that he was doing almost the same thing, began to covet pleasure, and chose to be the prince of the weak mind in terms of heirs, resulting in the final five nonsense, Sima Yan's crime was difficult to escape. After the Rebellion of the Eight Kings, all aspects of the Western Jin Dynasty's economy were so badly damaged that in the end, neither the emperor nor the generals could resist the attack of the Hu people's iron horse.

The Jin Dynasty was followed by the Five Hu and Sixteen Kingdoms of the Eastern Jin Dynasty, followed by the Southern and Northern Dynasties, until the Sui Dynasty of Yang Jian, the Duke of Sui, established the Great Sui Dynasty for hundreds of years since the Rebellion of the Eight Kings. Although the Sui Emperor Yang Guang was credited to the world in this regard, he wasted a lot of labor, and the people's living hardships were coupled with some erosion of private life, and Li Yuan, who was in Taiyuan, saw the opportunity to rebel and finally eliminate the anti-kings and unify the country. Although the Sui Emperor was a tyrant, he was still capable.

Taking stock of tyrants in history, are they really doing nothing?

?? The kings of the later subjugated countries are basically mediocre monarchs, but the founding emperor is a tyrant In the Ming Dynasty, there was a special case, whether it was Zhu Yuanzhang, the Ming Taizu who restored China, or Ming Chengzu Zhu Di, who later seized the throne and ascended the throne for the second time, who made a great contribution to history, but also because the four major cases of Hongwu killed tens of thousands of people, the extermination of the Fang Ten Tribes in the Zhu Di period and the killing of palace women in their later years were their political needs. Although he is a tyrant, his ability is unquestionable!

Read on