laitimes

There really is such a dynasty in history, which historians deliberately erase and are forgotten by future generations

Recently, the Internet has been full of too many statements about the Tang Yu Dynasty. Qian Jun thought that such remarks were a bit too ridiculous. If you only pretend to be amazing, to attract people's attention. Qian Jun happens to have a ready-made story here, where is Rong del equal to this present eye? However, the story of Qian Jun's tao is true in history, but "Confucius does not preach, too shi gong does not pass on" Later generations of non-professional scholars have rarely heard of it.

There really is such a dynasty in history, which historians deliberately erase and are forgotten by future generations

First of all, Qian Jun first sold a guanzi to talk to everyone about a well-known allusion as an introduction. The legend of the Houyi Shooting Sun is well known, have you ever known it? This allusion is the greatest fallacy in history. The master who really "shoots the sun" is actually Dayi, a figure in the legendary Emperor Yao period. Coincidentally, this houyi, which was falsely rumored to be "planted with stolen goods", did have its own people in history. It is a branch of the Dongyi tribal group of the Xia Dynasty, called the monarch of the country of the Poor Clan, and the Poor Clan is also one of the princely states of the Xia Dynasty. And this poor houyi is one of our protagonists today.

There really is such a dynasty in history, which historians deliberately erase and are forgotten by future generations

Even the greatest monarch in the world will eventually die, even if he is like Xia Houqi, who founded the first dynasty in Chinese history. After Xia Houqi's death, his eldest son Taikang succeeded to the throne. At this time, the Youqian clan was an eastern power, and although Houyi did not have the divine power of "shooting the sun" as the Great Yi, he was also a famous sharpshooter in history. Coincidentally, the sons of Xia Houqi were also angry, and before the bones of the corpse were cold, they caused a rebellion of the five sons. Hou Yi took advantage of the opportunity to attack the Xia Kingdom and seize the rule of the Xia Dynasty. Fortunately, at this time, the princely states were still devoted to the Xia Hou clan, and the power of the Xia Hou clan itself could not be underestimated, and Hou Yi was finally afraid to rush to replace it. He had to take advantage of the act of abolishing the establishment to firmly hold the power of the Xia Dynasty in his own hands, and he was firmly a powerful vassal who "blackmailed the Son of Heaven to order the princes". First abolish Taikang Li Zhongkang, zhongkang posthumously establish his son. Feeling that his wings are plump, he hurriedly expelled Xia Houxiang and established himself as Xia Hou. This is the story recorded in the "Zuo Chuan" Du Preliminary Note: "Hou Yi Dynasty Xia". There are more detailed records about this period of history in the "Zuo Zhuan" Du "Notes", and Qu Yuan also mentions it. The main point that everyone should pay attention to is that although Houyi was a Xia dynasty at this time, its national name has not changed, and it is still the Xia Dynasty at this time.

There really is such a dynasty in history, which historians deliberately erase and are forgotten by future generations

Who would have thought that after Hou Yi did xia, it would quickly corrupt, just like the ancient version of Tang Xuanzong Li Longji. Perhaps it is also Houyi who should have this report, at this time, he is ambitious, and he is deliberately trying to take his first rank and replace it with no one else, but his righteous son, who has a poor clan and a cold state. Han Hun was originally a han clan, deeply trusted by Hou Yi, and also had his wit, bravery in battle, and finally became the minister of the poor clan. At this time, Han Hun also knew that his opportunity had come, so he colluded with Hou Yi's wife and courtiers to kill him (there are also historical records that because he was bumped into by Hou Yi and had an affair with Hou Yi's wife, he was killed during the emergency), replacing Hou Yi as the queen of the Poor Clan. At this time, Hou Yi was not as lucky as Xiahou Xiang, who had been deposed by him. It is said that Han Hun wanted to deter the Poor Clan in order to stabilize its rule. Its meat was made into a meat soup and distributed to the poor nobles (some scholars believed to be distributed to their sons), and those who refused to eat it were beheaded on the spot. At this time, Empress Xia, who had been able to survive during the Later Yi Dynasty, was hiding in the place of the princely states of the same surname. The so-called one does not do, two do not stop. In order to put an end to the troubles, Han Huan also sent his sons to extinguish the Shu Guan clan and the Chu Xun clan and behead xia houxiang, changing the name of the country to Han and taking the place of the Xia Dynasty. At this time, a new dynasty appeared in history, the Han Dynasty (generally known as Han Hun in historical records). Fortunately, shortly after Han Huan's death, his son Shui was destroyed by Shao Kang, the widow of Xia Houxiang, with the help of Yu's power, and the Xia Dynasty was restored again. From the loss of Taikang to the shaokang Zhongxing, the general historical records believe that it was about forty years. This history is also recorded in detail in the Zuo Zhuan Du "Notes", "Bamboo Book Chronicle", "Later Han Shu Dongyi Biography", "Imperial Century" and other historical books. However, Confucius's taoism is not passed on, and the history of Taishi is not passed on. why?

There really is such a dynasty in history, which historians deliberately erase and are forgotten by future generations

Tai Shi Gong once wrote in the "Confucius Family": More than 3,000 poems of the ancients, and to Confucius, remove their weight, take it and apply it to etiquette. This is the earliest record in history of Confucius's deletion of poems. As for whether Confucius really deleted the "poems" and "books" in later generations, it has also been debated for more than two thousand years, and there is still no conclusive conclusion. Qian Jun did not have the heart to make any judgments at this point. Qian Jun ventured to speculate that the story of Houyi and Hanhun might have been deliberately drowned out because its actions were inconsistent with the "etiquette" transmitted by Confucius and Taishigong.

Read on