laitimes

Why didn't the French fight the defense of the capital at that time, so that the German army could enter the capital so easily?

"This article has been certified by blockchain technology for copyright, and any form of adaptation and reproduction is prohibited, and violators will be held legally responsible."

When it comes to World War II, we all know that it is a battle full of "bloody" from beginning to end. After all, in this battle, no matter which side attacks, which side defends is accompanied by killing. But the world is so big, sometimes words can't be said too absolutely. After all, in the Battle of France, the Germans easily occupied Paris. On the other hand, when the Soviet Union defended the capital Moscow, it could not be more tragic. So the question is, why didn't the French army fight the defense of the capital at that time, and how did it allow the German army to advance into the capital so easily?

Why didn't the French fight the defense of the capital at that time, so that the German army could enter the capital so easily?

On 4 June 1940, when the Anglo-French forces were defeated by the German army, more than 300,000 Soldiers of the Anglo-French Coalition were transported to Britain. At this time, the German army had just won the victory and wanted to reap the fruits of greater victory, just at this time France was empty inside, the main force was in Britain, and there was no effective military force at home. So the German army focused its strategic objectives on Britain, hoping to vent the victory of the battle by occupying Paris. Moreover, during the First World War, the German army had already attacked the edge of Paris, but unfortunately did not see the Eiffel Tower, which also intensified the determination to occupy Paris.

Why didn't the French fight the defense of the capital at that time, so that the German army could enter the capital so easily?

It was also at this time that the French president wanted to defend Paris to the death, but in the previous battles, the ministers around him lost confidence, and even the minister of defense thought it was a fearless resistance. In the later exchanges between France and Britain, there was no clear support from Britain, and the movement of Britain was not known, and even the return time of its own soldiers was not confirmed, which undoubtedly made France worse. Although in the exchange with the British, the British signaled that France should desperately resist and resist the German invasion with guerrilla warfare, but in the midst of internal and external troubles, France finally made a decision to abandon Paris in order to protect the people of Paris and Tonli from harm.

Why didn't the French fight the defense of the capital at that time, so that the German army could enter the capital so easily?

Although this move can be regarded as "preserving the overall situation", this matter has also become a major criticism in France. But because of this, we still have the opportunity to see the Eiffel Tower standing in Paris, and Paris can still maintain its original appearance. In fact, there is no right or wrong in this matter, after all, we are not immersed in the scene, and it is not good to comment on things reasonably.

Read on