Recently, netizens in Chuzhou, Anhui Province, shared an interesting video, in which a young boy with a red face and tears complained about his mother, saying that he scored 100 points in the exam, but his mother did not show anything. The mother cried and laughed and said that she praised her son every time for being great. But the boy ruthlessly exposed, saying that his mother's praise was very perfunctory, and other people's children had gifts for 100 points, and they just wanted a toy.
The boy continued to complain that every time he scored 100 points, his mother also said that she would reward him, but each time she said that she would wait for the next test to score 100 points. However, he had already scored 100 many times, and his mother had never fulfilled her promise. Hearing her son's ruthless disclosure, the mother originally wanted to continue to deny it, but seeing her son crying so sadly, perhaps it was a sudden "conscience discovery" and promised to take her son to buy toys immediately.
Netizens are also hotly discussed about this:
"My family is also like this, I will not buy toys on the 100 test, I can only use housework or self-care points to buy toys."
"This mother is so unauthentic, every time it hurts the child's heart, so that the child must be less and less interested in learning."
"This mother does not talk about martial arts, it is easy to beat off the children's enthusiasm for learning, it is recommended to correct it immediately, and give the children a positive image."
Whether to reward a child for a score of 100 on the test has always been controversial and makes sense. My personal feeling is that as long as the education is proper, the three views are correct, and the appropriate reward is understandable, because this can indeed improve the enthusiasm of children. Of course, in addition to material rewards, the parents' tutoring is the most important, can not let the child develop a "money theory", can not be repeated to the child's appointment.
What do you think?