According to legend, the Liangzhou Huimeng Incident, which occurred in 1247, marked that Tibet had belonged to China from then on.
Shocked, I consulted Baidu Encyclopedia, which represents the mainstream opinion, on its interpretation of the term "Liangzhou Huimeng", and said that this proved that Tibet has since been assigned to the Mongolian Yuan, and Tibet belongs to China.
I don't deny that Tibet belongs to China, but does the Liangzhou Huimeng really have such a significance? Obviously, it doesn't. There is no question of position, it is a question of facts.
Briefly introduced, the two sides of the Liangzhou Alliance, banzhida, the leader of the Sakya sect of Tibetan Buddhism during the split period, and Kuoduan, the son of wokoutai Khan of the Mongol Empire.
As a result of the alliance, Banzhida, with the support of the Mongol Empire, became the leader of the long-divided Tubo region, and the Sakya sect entered its heyday. Ban Zhida promised that the Tubo region would belong to the Mongol Empire, and the future successor of Ban Zhida, Ba Si Pa, would not only be the leader of the Tibetan region, but also the national teacher of the future Yuan Empire.
Just such a simple thing cannot give too much historical significance. This is to replace Ban Zhida with Cao Zhi, to replace Kuoduan with Liu Bei, Liu Bei to support Cao Zhi as the King of Wei, and the State of Wei to declare himself a vassal to Liu Bei, and it is estimated that no one has any historical significance.
Moreover, this matter is not included in the history textbook composed of historical significance. The reason is that this historical significance is not good and hard, according to Baidu Encyclopedia, there are also many hard injuries.
Does The fact that Tibet belonged to the Mongol Empire mean that Tibet belonged to China from that time on? Not at all, because 1247 was the seventh year of the Southern Song Dynasty. At that time, China was represented by the Southern Song Dynasty, and it is impossible to say that the Mongol Empire at that time was China. Because the Mongol Empire at that time was different from the future Yuan Empire, the Mongol Empire did not consider itself to be Chinese, nor did it speak Chinese, did not write Chinese characters, did not respect Confucianism, and did not have a little Chinese element. The result of the Liangzhou Huimeng is not to say that Tubo belongs to the Southern Song Dynasty, so it is inappropriate to give historical significance to chaos, which makes people laugh.
Taking a step back, Baidu Encyclopedia said that Liangzhou Huimeng represented Tubo to belong to the Mongolian Yuan Empire, is this a problem? If that's okay, that's fine. After all, the Yuan Empire is not equal to the Mongol Empire and can represent China. Unfortunately, the Liangzhou Huimeng could not represent Tubo's belonging to the Mongol Yuan Empire.
Because there was no Yuan Dynasty at that time, the Liangzhou Hui league that occurred in 1247 could not prove that Tubo belonged to the Yuan Empire established in 1271.
That can't be said to be meaningless, but it doesn't have that kind of meaning.
Also facing the Mongolian Iron Horse, compared to the death of Hua Lazimo, the Liangzhou Huimeng of Tubo is obviously much better. Not only were the people slaughtered in the Mongols, but even the culture was wiped out in the meadows of the Mongols in Central Asia. The Tubo people were spared from the ravages of war because of the Liangzhou Alliance, and the Tubo culture was not only well preserved, but also influenced Mongolia, and even assimilated Mongolia to a certain extent.
▲ Tubo-based Basiba Mongolian
Compared with the previous slaughter of the Tubo Kadam sect, the Sakya sect's alliance is obviously a more correct move. Because there is no other way, isn't it more important to survive? Not to figure the present, no plot to the future. Thanks to the Fact that only 100,000 people were martyred in the Southern Song Dynasty's Yashan Naval Battle, if 10 million people were martyred to show their integrity, where would Zhu Yuanzhang expel the Tartars in the future and restore China?
As long as you don't hurt others, you can't overdo it. But to show one's integrity by wrapping up the lives of others is no different from a butcher.
For example, Cixi, how angry she was when she declared war on the Eleven Kingdoms, but her integrity was in place, and then she ran away, and it was someone else who died.
Liangzhou Huimeng was actually a win-win meeting of cooperation, the Mongol Empire soldiers controlled Tubo without bloodshed, Tubo ended the situation of partition, Tubo people were spared from war slaughter, which was a miracle in Asia at that time, Ban Zhida became the leader of Tubo, Tubo culture assimilated some Mongols, and the Mongols also came out of obscurity to a certain extent under Tubo culture.
This is the unchangeable truth in human history for thousands of years, and when violence cannot be won, it is necessary to play with culture. In the same way, if you want to conquer a nation and make it a leek, you must first destroy its culture, and it is better to change the culture to narrow nationalism, which is perfect.
As for when Tibet was incorporated into the Chinese territory, it is precise to say that from the Yuan Dynasty to the first year of the Yuan Dynasty (1264), the Yuan Dynasty ancestors established the General System Yuan, which not only managed the affairs of Buddhism throughout the country, but also led the administration of Tibetan areas, which was the beginning of the first institutional management of Tibet by the Central Dynasty. Retrospectively, it is calculated from the establishment of a minister stationed in Tibet in the fifth year of Qing Yongzheng (1727). To say that since ancient times, these historical facts are enough, and it will be counterproductive to find a supplement to the Liangzhou Huimeng.