Zhongxin Jingwei Client, March 10 (Wei Wei) The judicial judgment of Yu Tao, an employee of the Bank of Communications who had been named by the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection as "petty officials and huge greed", has been resulting, and his criminal history has been disclosed for the first time.
On March 5, a judgment published on the judgment documents network showed that Yu Tao, while serving as a senior trade union officer of the Employee Department of the Bank of Communications and secretary of the Youth League Committee of the organ, sought benefits for business units, demanded and accepted bribes totaling more than 10.72 million yuan, and embezzled 820,000 yuan of funds from the Bank of Communications. How did a trade union officer and secretary of the Youth League Committee of the Head Office become a typical example of "petty officials and huge greed"?
Employee welfare programs have become a breeding ground for bribery
Yu Tao's case originated in March 2019, the discipline inspection and supervision of the Bank of Communications and the Supervision Commission of the Pudong New Area Discipline Inspection Commission, after a lot of preliminary work, on the basis of effective evidence, his bribery, job encroachment and other issues surfaced, was named by the Central Discipline Inspection Commission as "petty official giant greed", and said that this case formed a strong deterrent in the Bank of Communications.
According to public information, Yu Tao was born in 1983, and his LinkedIn page introduces that he began to work at the head office of the Bank of Communications in February 2011, and has also won the honor of advanced individual and outstanding regiment cadre many times.
How did he get on the path of bribery with a bright resume? According to the judgment, from April 2012 to March 2019, Yu Tao took advantage of his position in charge of organizing the Bank of Communications to carry out labor competitions, employee care, workers' homes, health huts, happiness indexes and other projects to seek benefits for business units, from which he solicited and accepted bribes totaling more than 10.72 million yuan.
According to the judgment, a total of 7 companies involved in Yu Tao's bribery, including Shanghai Xinrui Industrial Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Xinrui Company"), Shanghai Glio Enterprise Management Consulting Co., Ltd., Shanghai Youyijia Health Management Consulting Co., Ltd., Shanghai Xinrong Health Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai Experience Culture Communication Co., Ltd., Shanghai Click Law (Shanghai) Network Technology Co., Ltd., and Shanghai Jiuyun Yuhuang Public Relations Planning Co., Ltd., yu Tao received 7.2 million yuan, 2.09 million yuan, 1.06 million yuan, 150,000 yuan and 180,000 yuan respectively , 20,000 yuan, 25,000 yuan.
The largest of these was from Jiang Peng and the Xinrui Company, which he actually controlled, and Yu Tao took advantage of his position in organizing labor competitions and purchasing prizes at the Bank of Communications to seek improper benefits for Xinrui Company and many other companies by designating suppliers, disclosing the bottom bid, colluding in bidding, etc.
In addition, the relevant organs found out that Yu Tao also proposed to Jiang Peng that the Bank of Communications had more business to do, not to concentrate on one company, and to ask multiple companies to participate in competitive negotiations, so Jiang Peng borrowed the identity cards of his company's employees to register and set up 5 companies, and conducted bidding and business dealings with the Bank of Communications in the name of these companies.
A staff member of a state-owned enterprise trade union in Beijing said that it is relatively rare for such a huge amount of bribes to appear in the trade union, and it is generally involved in large-scale procurement and long-term cooperative relations with suppliers. For example, the union where he is located purchases only a few tens of thousands of yuan per purchase, the procurement of goods will solicit everyone's opinions, the goods purchased each time are different, and the relationship with suppliers is not stable.
"In the Yutao case, focusing on regulatory responsibilities and approval loopholes, revealing problems such as the chaotic management of trade union lines and the serious lack of centralized procurement supervision, we issued supervision proposals to relevant units to urge the formulation of systems such as the Implementation Rules for the Authorization of Trade Union Financial Management, timely cutting off the chain of interests, plugging regulatory loopholes, and building a solid ideological defense line." On December 26, 2019, the official website of the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection pointed out in an article.
The first instance judgment sentenced him to 9 years' imprisonment
The Shanghai Pudong New Area People's Court held that the defendant Yu Tao, as a staff member of the company, took advantage of his position to solicit and illegally accept property from others to seek benefits for others, and the amount was huge, and his conduct constituted the crime of accepting bribes from non-state functionaries; the defendants Yu Tao and Jiang Peng took advantage of Yu Tao's position for the purpose of illegal possession to jointly illegally occupy the property of the bank, and the amount was relatively large, and their acts constituted the crime of embezzlement of office.
The court's first-instance judgment held that the defendant Yu Tao was sentenced to 8 years' imprisonment for accepting bribes from non-state workers, and sentenced to 2 years' imprisonment for the crime of usurpation of office, and decided to carry out 9 years' imprisonment and confiscate 500,000 yuan of property.
In addition, enterprises such as Xinrui Company and related responsible persons who paid bribes to Yu Tao were sentenced to the crime of bribery.
According to the above-mentioned article, the discipline inspection and supervision group stationed at the Bank of Communications has dug deep and deep into the political ecological problems behind the Yu Tao case of the staff department of the head office, quickly found out that the two principal responsible persons of the party organization under his command have failed to perform the main responsibility of comprehensively and strictly administering the party, and that they themselves are not correct; individual departments of the head office have "engaged in small groups, blowing and patting, eating and drinking, weaving a network of relations, and engaging in political speculation." The relationship between some cadres and colleagues of the head office is not smooth, and the relationship between superiors and subordinates is irregular, and other problems, and 13 party members and cadres have been seriously dealt with, and a strong signal that discipline will be strictly enforced Effectively reverse the political ecology of relevant departments and lines.
It is reported that since the beginning of 2019, the discipline inspection and supervision organs of the Bank of Communications have handled a total of 1,041 problem clues, an increase of 3.7% year-on-year, filed 363 cases, and given 464 sanctions, an increase of 26% and 24.7% year-on-year; the discipline inspection and supervision team stationed at the Bank of Communications has handled 12 cases by itself, an increase of 140% year-on-year, 7 people have been given party disciplinary sanctions, 1 person has been suspended for inspection, 7 people have been admonished to talk, 3 cases of serious violations of discipline and law have been investigated and handled, and 7 people have been retained. (Zhongxin Jingwei APP)
Zhongxin Jingwei copyright, without written authorization, any unit and individual shall not reprint, excerpt and use in other ways.
![The king of the stupid birds who practice polygamy and cannot fly, the parrot[fig]]()