In 2018, with the accusations of netizens, CCTV famous mouth Zhu Jun has since stepped off the altar, he not only lost the opportunity to work on CCTV, but also suffered from the invasion of network public opinion and gossip, and now three years later, the whole process of this case has gradually become clear, although the trial results have come out, but many doubts behind it are still chilling.
Before starting today's video, the new officials don't forget to pay attention to it, hold the like for more than 2 seconds there is a surprise, the beijing Haidian District People's Court's trial result for this case is, "there is no evidence that Zhu Jun has xq behavior", that is to say, all the accusations against Zhu Jun by The string are not established, Zhu Jun finally cleared his grievances and took back the right to breathe, originally the truth was revealed is a thing worth celebrating, but Zhu Jun endured three years of online insults, who is this account to calculate?
As a famous host of CCTV, Zhu Jun is also a famous mouth loved by three generations of old, middle and young people, in addition to being the host of the Spring Festival Gala, the major programs of CCTV always have his figure, and the "Art Life" hosted by him has accompanied the growth of a generation, if there is no such thing, he will successfully retire from CCTV.
However, in 2018, the unilateral accusations of The String Zi made him lose his career, and at that time, there were many such cases in the society, coupled with the adverse influence of South Korea's n-room, Taiwanese director Niu Chengze, etc., the xq case was paid an unprecedented high degree of attention among the public, and people began to really pay attention to the xq case in the workplace.
At this time, a netizen named Xianzi said that he was xq by Zhu Jun, and for a time public opinion was in an uproar, Zhu Jun also died suddenly overnight, and since then, Zhu Jun has never appeared under the lens of CCTV, on the one hand, because of organizational discipline and consideration of eliminating influence, on the other hand, it takes time to fight a lawsuit with Chord.
These three years for Zhu Jun is nothing less than hellish suffering, he gained innocence, but lost career and reputation, strings, although she did not win the case, but she gained fame and hundreds of thousands of fans, who is the winner, at a glance, subsequently, many doubts in this case gradually emerged, one of which is the fact that Zhu Jun harassed her in the CCTV dressing room.
She claimed that Zhu Jun put his hands on her, the whole process lasted for nearly an hour, after which she called the police, but after the police came, there was no evidence to give up, this matter is the truth of what The String said, but let us think about it carefully and it is not difficult to find that her words are full of loopholes.
First of all, they were in the CCTV dressing room, there were actors, hosts and makeup artists and staff, and there were at least dozens of people in and out of the nearly one hour, did Zhu Jun really have the courage to go up and down to you in public? Even if he dared, why didn't these people who witnessed the "facts of the crime" come forward to testify?
According to the follow-up investigation of the police, all the people who went in and out of the dressing room did not see Zhu Jun's restless movements, and even a few people categorically said that Zhu Jun had not made improper movements, and Xianzi could not come up with any evidence of Zhu Jun's xq, so the police also made a record for Zhu Jun and released him, but Xianzi began the road of prosecution in full swing.
She took advantage of the east wind of the Internet to attract a large number of fans for herself, and began to frequently contact foreign media, making a big speech that reversed black and white, and Xian Zi said to foreign media after the first trial that the court refused to conduct DNA re-examination for her.
This incident is completely smeared, because the police have already conducted a DNA check on the skirt of the string, which is what the police did after the string called the police, but after the evidence was collected, she did not hand the skirt to the police. The audience can pay a little attention, let's take a look at the details of Zhu Jun's case.
And she doesn't have the physical evidence sheet left by the police, so the court will naturally not support your request, that is to say, you yourself caused the inability to collect evidence, so why did the foreign media say that the court rejected you? It's hard not to think that Strings is deliberately smearing the judiciary.
Second, Xian Zi has been saying to foreign media that the police do not transfer the surveillance video of the dressing room, with the intention of showing that the monitoring can be revealed, which is equivalent to throwing the pot to the police and CCTV, so it is difficult not to suspect that the police and CCTV have colluded, but the actual situation is that the dressing room is not within the scope of monitoring at all.
The police have shown the monitoring to The String as early as 2018, but they can't see anything, and the String Zi himself has seen the monitoring and can't see anything, and also said to the foreign media that the police do not provide monitoring, which is smearing the police.
Third, when Xianzi was interviewed by the BBC, he said that the second-instance judge did not ask questions, in fact, at the first trial, the judge had already asked all the questions, but Xianzi posted on the Internet that he had been unfairly tried, and at the second trial, her so-called "fans" stood at the door of the court with the sign of "supporting the strings", most of these fans were students in school, without the ability to think independently, usually on the Internet, they thought that the real world was like this, but they did not expect to be shot by the strings in the end.
Therefore, after the trial, the judge only needs to look at the evidence, but The string is smearing the Chinese judge in front of the foreign media, his heart is reprehensible, let's look at the evidence submitted by the string to the court is even more ridiculous, since you said that Zhu Jun harassed you, you only need to come up with evidence that Zhu Jun harassed you, but the string has come up with a bunch of evidence that Zhu Jun "harassed" others.
And these evidences are all ridiculous, the first evidence is Zhu Jun and Dong Qing singing video at the CCTV party, in the performance, Zhu Jun and Dong Qing held hands, Xian Zi believes that this is Zhu Jun's sexual harassment of Dong Qing, and the second evidence is the actor Jin Chen on Zhu Jun's program.
In the show, Jin Chen showed her dance skills, according to the director's arrangement, Zhu Jun pressed her waist crotch when Jin Chen was down, this action is very normal, because Zhu Jun's wife is the famous military dancer Tan Mei, but The string said that Jin Chen was sexually assaulted by Zhu Jun in the show.
The third evidence is a newspaper, this newspaper published the news of Zhu Jun's painting, Xian Zi said that in the dressing room Zhu Jun said that he liked to draw, so this newspaper is evidence of sexual assault, the fourth evidence is a testimony, the person who wrote this testimony does not know who it is, and did not go to court as a witness, anyway, this testimony said that Zhu Jun was sexually harassed, if there is a little bit of logic in other evidence, then this last piece of evidence is completely nonsense.
You can convict someone else by writing a random testimony, so what else is the law doing? After reading these absurd evidences, everyone should be able to imagine why Zhu Jun won the case. Because There is no evidence at all, she is just making false accusations, and she used the network to create a storm of public opinion that lasted for three years and completely defeated a CCTV host.
During the trial of the case, Xian Zi has been interviewed by foreign media, and the foreign media have poured out their bitter water, it seems that the land of Shenzhou has no place for her, and these shameless acts will make foreigners have a bad impression of China.
Those struggling Chinese the image that has been hard to establish in the international community has been erased by people like Strings, and from this incident, a large number of netizens need to reflect on why a string can lead the noses of thousands of people, why when she says Zhu Jun xq her, everyone will believe it without hesitation.
And Zhu Jun's image before this has always been very good, he is a host with outstanding business ability, but also a good husband and a good father, so people with no groove are falsely accused so easily, are those who are slightly tainted more likely to be wronged? What is your view of the Zhu Jun case? Welcome to talk about your views in the comment area, like please click a thumbs up to pay attention to Oh, thank you very much for your encouragement to me, follow me, we will see you in the next issue!