When it comes to the heart of the problem, Blinken's words are vague and the nature of the paper tiger is exposed

Text/Walking Stuka

On October 31, Secretary of State Blinken, who was far away in Rome, gave a remote interview to CNN. The timing of the interview was very delicate, the day before he "sneaked into" the Chinese delegation's residence and held a brief meeting with Foreign Minister Wang Yi; earlier, CNN also interviewed Tsai Ing-wen, during which she made a big fuss, spread "separatist" remarks, and even admitted that "there are US military activities in Taiwan."

For Blinken, this day's interview is not easy to deal with, because CNN directly raised the topic that the US government has been trying to avoid when manipulating the Taiwan issue, "whether to send troops to protect Taiwan." In the interview, the host raised this question many times, Blinken launched a series of dodges, and launched the "repeat machine" skill, repeatedly emphasizing that "the United States will help Taiwan improve its self-defense capabilities", but did not talk about "whether to send troops to protect Taiwan".

CNN will, of course, raise these questions. Since this period of time, the attitude of the United States on the Taiwan issue can be described as a dawn and a twilight, with one meeting expressing "full support for the Taiwan region's participation in the United Nations" and the other saying that "the attitude of the United States has not changed." However, the sensitivity of the Taiwan issue is unlikely to reassure the outside world about the left-right attitude of the United States, as Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi warned Blinken earlier, "Once it is handled wrongly, it will cause subversive and overall damage to Sino-US relations."

Blinken is also an old fritter in the political stick, and Dana Bash, the CNN host who interviewed Blinken, is not a newcomer, and has repeatedly asked Blinken not to use "perfect diplomatic rhetoric" to answer questions, but Blinken is absolutely impossible to say anything other than "perfect diplomatic rhetoric" - this has actually revealed a lot of information.

Earlier, when China reminded the US side, it pointed out that Washington wanted to "make a breakthrough" on the Taiwan Strait issue. The breakthrough that the United States wants is to create "two Chinas" in the United Nations, so as to "internationalize" the Taiwan issue and create conditions for attracting more allies to intervene in the situation in the Taiwan Strait.

Washington's wishful thinking is that he alone can no longer prevent China from completing the final reunification, and must use the power of its allies to form a huge camp to deter the mainland and force the mainland to abandon the process of reunification. To put it simply, the United States knows that it is a paper tiger, and it cannot scare Chinese mainland just by relying on a paper tiger, so it wants to pull a bunch of paper tigers over. So there was a way for Blinken to try his best to manipulate the Taiwan Strait issue, but in the face of a possible war, he began to jump left and right.

In the eyes of the outside world, this gesture is actually very funny, like a robber who is worried about the treasure of a large family, but he is jealous of the high wall and deep courtyard of the family, and can only secretly dig the corner of the wall in the middle of the night.

The United States' attempt to engage in the so-called "two Chinas" was impossible to do more than 50 years ago when it was a superpower, and even more impossible to do it now! The United States' vain attempt to build the island of Taiwan into a poisonous apple to prevent China's rejuvenation and rise can only be Washington's wishful thinking; whether it is a trade war or a tariff war, whether it is to use the so-called "traceability of the epidemic" or "climate problems" to throw dirty water on China, or to send warships and military planes to China's periphery to show off its might, it cannot change the pace of China's progress.

On October 30, Blinken sneaked into the Chinese delegation's premises through the side door and was "lectured in person" by Foreign Minister Wang Yi; on October 31, Blinken was interviewed by the media and could only act as a "repeating machine" in the face of key questions, and used "perfect diplomatic rhetoric" to cope with things.

As the saying goes, "one force will drop ten meetings", the United States can not get on the table in these things, and it will never succeed in front of China!