As members of the royal family, the biggest difference in their lives is the time spent with their parents.
Take Charles, the old crown prince of the British royal family, who once regarded his nanny as a "stand-in mother" because he did not receive the attention of his parents when he was a child.
In fact, the nanny working in the royal family has always been an important role, the British "Mirror" said: the nanny is an important part of the British royal family life, from the queen herself to the fourth generation of princes and princesses, almost every member of the royal family is taken care of by the nanny in the process of growing up.
Nannies are not only employees of the royal family, but often end up being part of the royal family.
However, this does not mean that the nanny can achieve the same status as members of the royal family in the royal family, especially with the queen, and the clear monarchy relationship is absolutely insurmountable. Even members of the royal family are.
Unfortunately, one of Charles's nannies did not understand this fact, and she blatantly disobeyed the queen's orders, and the result was naturally sad.
According to the data, Charles grew up with two nannies, one named Helen Lightbody and the other Marbel Anderson.
According to the sources, Charles lived with the two nannies in his childhood, but the queen did not see each other very often as a mother.
However, Helen Lightbodi was a very high-profile nanny who was extremely particular about Charles's diet.
Royal writer Brian Kozlovsky wrote in Long Live the Queen! In the book 13 Rules of Life from Britain's longest-reigning monarch, he puts it this way:
"Lightbody is said to have enjoyed torturing Buckingham Palace's kitchen to exacting standards, and she often denied dishes for little Charles or asked the chef to redo them, and the Queen eventually fed up with her and fired her."
There is, of course, a story in which WrightBody not only tortured the kitchen of Buckingham Palace, but also indulged Charles, and Prince Philip was repeatedly displeased, believing that the nanny was too spoiled for Charles, which would have a great impact on his life, so he wanted to dismiss WrightBody.
But what really caused the Queen to make up her mind was a pudding, and yes, Buckingham Palace called the event a "special pudding" incident.
Charles was 8 years old at the time, and the Queen stumbled upon a pudding that tasted good, so in order to express her maternal love, she was ready to share it with her son.
Charles was at school, and the Queen wrote a letter to the school, asking the school to provide her son with this pudding with the love of a mother.
But who knew that Lightbody did not agree, and directly crossed out this pudding from the menu.
The consequences of the queen knowing this can be imagined: this is a blatant disobedience to the queen's orders, this is contempt for the supreme leader! So, the Queen was so angry that she dismissed Helen Lightbody.
However, this seems to fulfill Marbel Anderson, because Charles was only 8 years old at this time, and he regarded Anderson as the most important person in life to rely on.
It is said that the first person Charles wants to meet every day after school is Anderson, and this continues until the age of 16, every day the two people at the same table to eat, chat, and even talk, and every night they kiss and say goodnight to each other. It can be seen that Charles and Anderson have a deep affection.
According to the royal writer Sarah Bradford, charles was very reluctant to leave Anderson when he was 17 years old when he was going to study in Australia, so he wrote in his diary:
"It's horrible, and I hate to leave everyone, especially Edward (Charles's brother) and Marbert."
Because of this, it is widely believed that Charles has an Oedipus complex, but this so-called "mother" is not a mother, but his nanny.
This is also evidenced by the British "master of palmistry" Robin Laurie, who once showed Charles a palmistry through photographs, saying that "Charles has a strong 'Oedipus complex' and is willing and even likes to be controlled." ”
When Charles fell in love with Camilla, he had a certain connection with this aspect.
The outside world will feel strange, whether it is body or appearance, Camilla can not be compared with Diana.
Charles, however, has been inseparable from Camilla for decades, and in addition to Camilla's personality advantages, there is another important factor: she has many similarities with Charles's nanny Anderson.
Anderson, like Camilla, has a long, slightly collapsed face that is less obvious now.
If we take out photos of her youth and compare them to those left behind by Anderson, we'll quickly discover the secret: the two are so similar.
Charles was only 23 when she met Camilla, but she was also 23 when Anderson first entered the royal family to take care of Charles. That's why Charles was fascinated by Camilla when he first saw her, and he couldn't put it down again.
In fact, Charles never forgot his nanny Anderson, who, after getting married, thought of bringing the retired nanny back to the royal family to take care of William and Harry for himself.
However, Diana was fiercely opposed to this, believing that the children should receive a new education, not the royal family's antiquated child-rearing program. However, there are other sources that show that Diana seems to be aware of Charles's obsession with the nanny, and even alarmed the queen because of this incident.
In any case, Charles did not invite Anderson back to the royal family, but he also closed the door to Diana.
Some people say that why Diana lost in this relationship is not that she did not work hard, nor that she was too hardworking, but that she discovered Charles's secret.
Whether this is the case or not, Diana has now died, this matter has become a dead proof, and Charles, after 8 years of Diana's death, finally braved the public opinion to marry Camilla back to the royal family.
It can be seen that the power of Charles's inner emotions is definitely not as simple as loving Camilla.
Without the support of the "Oedipus complex", I am afraid that he would not have competed with the queen, with the royal family, with the British people, and firmly wanted to marry Camilla into the door.
This is robin's inference: the ring on Charles's little finger represents his heart-to-heart connection with his mother, but the ring is too heavy, thus showing his strong inner "Oedipus complex".
At the same time, his emotional lines suggest that Charles himself is a deeply emotional man, in most cases self-centered.
Although there is not much corroboration for these legends about Charles, from his life experience and his unwavering love with Camilla, we seem to know a little bit about the secret between the two people.
A Camilla who impresses Charles by his looks and traps Charles by emotional intelligence is, in the final analysis, it is only charles's deep feelings in his heart: the stand-in mother makes him never get out of the psychological self-needs, so he chooses Camilla who looks similar to the "stand-in mother".