Everyone knows that the current King Charles III of United Kingdom has had two marriages, the first being the British Rose Diana married in 1981, when he was 33 years old.
Typical late marriage, isn't it? But Charles can't help it, his long-standing wish is to complete his life events before the age of 30, otherwise his status as the crown prince will also be questioned.
It's a pity that although he was born with a throne to inherit, he didn't have any peach blossom luck, and he started proposing marriage at the age of 25 until he was 30 years old, and a total of 4 female protagonists were changed, and in the end they didn't become married, which was quite embarrassing.
In fact, as Charles, from the perspective of being a good person, he wanted to marry a princess-level girl, but in the end he only married the daughter of a noble family, and his old father-in-law was still an attendant to his queen mother, which was also one of his various unsatisfactory aspects.
So why didn't Charles marry a princess to enhance his status as a noble crown prince? He thought about it too, but it was embarrassing, and the princess heard that there was a Camilla, and finally the family turned and left.
What's the situation? It turns out that there is a story here. Charles had reached the age of 29 when he proposed three times, and finally met Marie · Astrid, Princess of Luxembourg, an excellent girl with the title of princess and always the president of the Luxembourg Youth Red Cross.
Mary's father was the Grand Duke of Luxembourg, and her mother was Princess Belgium, and her excellent birth combined with her own excellence was far more noble than Diana.
What's more, Mary is also poor-looking, with a rich and round face, blue eyes, and blonde hair, which is quite aristocratic.
The point is that she is a few years older than Diana Di and 6 years younger than Charles.
In all fairness, this age difference is still okay, at least they won't have no common topics between them, not to mention that they are from a royal family, and they know better what forbearance and responsibility are, and they are definitely not in love like Diana.
Charles felt very good after dating Mary, the princess was magnificent, dignified, and well versed in the survival of the royal family.
Whether it is mentally or psychologically, she will definitely be better qualified for the role of the princess, and the queen is also very fond of her.
In 1977, news came out in the United Kingdom's Daily Express: Prince Charles was about to get engaged to Princess Mary · Astrid.
But after this news came out, it was like a dumb firecracker, and the United Kingdom people did not wait for a response.
However, Charles later gave a seemingly humorous feedback: "People who don't know each other don't get engaged, and the royal family doesn't participate in arranged marriages." ”
Is this a marriage yellow? It is said that Princess Mary rejected the political marriage to Prince Charles, and the reason you can't imagine is that it is all the credit of Camilla.
Charles met Camilla in 1970, and the two of them were in a hot spot, and the most interesting thing is that when he was dating a woman named Anna · Wallace, they rejected the crown prince directly because of Camilla:
"I've never been treated so badly in my life, no one has treated me like that, and neither can you (Charles)."
It turned out that while dancing, Charles saw Camilla, so he directly snubbed his girlfriend Anna, and was tragically unilaterally out.
Princess Mary is not stupid, she can tolerate Charles's affair, but she can't accept having a lover like a shadow in marriage.
In this way, this marriage, which could be called the most compatible and most recognized by the royal family, was messed up by Charles, and his relationship with Camilla has become a major event that affects his life.
No one expected that the simple Diana would know that there were tigers in the mountains and would prefer the tigers, regardless of the interests of Camilla, the old lover, and resolutely entered the marriage.
Of course, the ending is also quite tragic. Diana lost not only the title of princess, but also fifteen years of neglected, indifferent, and painful to the point of despair of marriage, which was too miserable.