Writer Fang Fang is undoubtedly the hottest writer in 2020. Her "Wuhan Diary" caused a huge response. When the news of the diary's publication at the speed of light overseas came, this "response" reached an unprecedented level. The supporters vigorously supported it, and the opponents resolutely opposed it, forming two distinct camps.
Square
One of the main reasons why Fang Fang's "Wuhan Diary" has caused great controversy is the authenticity of this diary. During that special period, Fang Fang could only stay at home. The sources of her diary are mainly based on "hearing", "saying", and "listening to friends". Is such news reliable? Can it be written in a "diary"?
However, Fang Fang seemed to think it was okay. She has written many times to explain: her messages, which are reliable and true. Even if it is a picture of "no one on the ground", it is "if you don't see it, it doesn't mean you don't have it". In the view of the writer Fang Fang, this is "common sense" and cannot be doubted.
However, before writing "Wuhan Diary", the writer Fang Fang had a different attitude. In 2018, writer Fang Fang wrote an article titled "Severe Criticism of Liu Jiming". Fang Fang, who was also the chairman of the Hubei Provincial Writers Association, severely criticized Vice Chairman Liu Jiming. The main reason for the criticism is because Liu Jiming is "listening to some news from others".
"The source of everything is to listen to others", this is Fang Fang's summary of Liu Jiming. "'Listening to someone' is Liu Jiming's evidence, and this 'someone' did not appear. So, whether he really listened to what others said, or Liu Jiming's own fabrications..." Obviously, the writer Fang Fang firmly does not believe in news such as "listening to someone".
Screenshot of Fang Fang's "Severe Criticism of Li Jiming"
Writer Fang Fang further said, "All kinds of people chewing their tongues, not young and old", "gossip paragraphs, has always been the condiment in life, pass the time, have fun, and so on, how can it be taken seriously?" "How can these hearsay, uncertain events, and unsubstantiated rumors be made public by name without confirmation or evidence, so that the whole society can know?"
In the view of the writer Fang Fang, doing such a thing "goes against morality, which has long been the basic common sense of society." However, it is interesting that in 2020, the writer Fang Fang did this kind of "contrarian morality" and violated "basic common sense". She just sat at home and wrote "Wuhan Diary" by "hearing about it" and "saying it", and published it overseas.
Screenshot of Fang Fang's "Severe Criticism of Liu Jiming"
Not only do we know it as a whole, but even the whole world knows it. However, at this time, Fang Fang no longer thought that this "listening to others" was unreasonable, but instead swore that these were all true. She had a good idea when she severely criticized Liu Jiming, but when it came to herself, it was another matter entirely.
As for the doubts about her in society, Fang Fang mouthed an "ultra-left" and refuted it without any justification. In the same article, she was very "welcome" to criticize. "Even if the perpetrators of bad deeds are famous people, public figures, you cannot criticize", once criticized, "it seems that the reputation of those people is not damaged by their own illegal and bad deeds, but by the critics.".
In Fang Fang's view, without criticism, the result is very dangerous, "How can our society not be civilized and morally degenerate?" Judging from this article, the writer Fang Fang does not believe in "listening to others" and "welcomes criticism". However, since the writer Fang Fang wrote "Wuhan Diary", how did she sentence the two?
She wrote 60 diaries by "listening to others", and when she was questioned, she did not have the appearance of accepting criticism with an open mind. At this time, she was not worried about the "slippery slope of civilization and the loss of morality"? In the previous article, the spear in the hands of the writer Fang Fang later became a shield in her hand. Is that what the word "contradictory" means?
If a famous person, a public figure, is so contradictory, it is really puzzling and a little funny. How can you put it on others and have a word for it, but it doesn't work on yourself? In fact, we took the article written by Fang Fang himself and changed the name of the person in it, which is really a very good article criticizing Fang Fang. Is this called "treating others in their own way"? "Tianlong Eight Parts" Murong Jia is best at this.