A hunting dog chased a rabbit and chased it for a long time without chasing it.
When the shepherd saw this, he smiled at the hound and said, "The smaller one between the two of you runs faster." ”
The hound replied, "You don't know, the two of us run for completely different purposes, I just ran for a meal, and the little rabbit ran for my life!" ”
This was heard by the hunter, who thought: This hound is right, then I have to think of a better way to get more food.
So the hunter bought a few more hounds and stipulated that anyone who could catch a rabbit in the hunt would get a few bones, and those who could not catch it would not have to eat. The trick worked, and the hounds tried to get the bones. They went after the rabbits. This good situation did not last long, and new problems arose. It turns out that the big rabbit is difficult to be caught, the small rabbit is easy to catch, but the bones that catch the big rabbit and the bones that catch the small rabbit are almost the same, the hounds are good at observation, found this stealing door, so they specially went to catch the small rabbit, and gradually everyone knew the secret, and the big rabbit caught was less and less.
Confused again, the hunter summoned the hounds to a meeting, and the hunter said to the hounds, "What have you caught lately that is getting smaller and smaller?" The hounds said, "It doesn't make any difference anyway, so why bother catching those big rabbits?" ”
From the game between the hound and the hunter, we have learned a little bit of the way of business operation, that is, in the process of business operation, it is not advisable to engage in egalitarianism of eating cauldron rice, and the incentive mechanism should reflect the difference.
Finally, thank you all for sharing!