I can't imagine what kind of noise this random topic will be if it is thrown on Weibo.
The latest Korea variety show, simply opened the screen lightning strike:
"All men are potential perpetrators."
"Women's rights have become a privilege today."
"Those who lie flat should be eliminated."
"The minimum wage will only make more and more people lazy."
"Homosexuality is an acquired mistake."
"Discrimination against blacks is justified to some extent."
Is this something that can be said......
Every topic is provocative, the kind that paralyzes Weibo every minute.
Debate tournaments?
No, no, no.
To put it simply, people are not just talking about it, but designing these-for-tat debates as an existential challenge.
You can try to substitute, if it were you, how would you win this "Three Views Tear X Version Battle Royale":
Idea Verification Zone
Ideological Verification Area: The Community
01
You, what an ingredient
Korea survival games are not new.
For example, in "Praise Internet Celebrity", the traffic competition mechanism of "bad money drives out good money" is set, and in "The Call of the Siren", women from all walks of life break out in a survival battle on the island.
"Idea Verification Zone" boldly focuses on political ideas and positions.
Word:
It is to attract all kinds of topics on the Internet, put 12 people with different views together, and concentrate on "raising Gu".
You've heard of the MBTI personality classification.
The Idea Verification Area is also divided into four dimensions, each with a maximum value of 3, with a - on the left and + on the right.
From this, a political coordinate is determined for each person:
First, the political dimension.
Left or Right.
the pursuit of big government centered on welfare and redistribution, for the left; Pursue a small government centered on the free market, for the right.
Very abstract?
Take the contestants in the show, for example.
Baekwoon, from the Democratic Party of Korea and the youngest secretary in Moon's camp, advocates narrowing the gap between the poor and the rich by improving government policies or institutions, such as taxes.
Superman, a politician of the National Power Party, is as his name suggests, and implements the conservative temperament of advocating strength, competition, and tradition.
The two are on the perfect opposite side of the political spectrum, and they are old rivals in the political arena outside the show.
The two directly "opened the bar":
White Bear hopes that everyone here can survive safely, and Superman directly counterattacks you This is hypocrisy.
Then, worthy of Korea, the key issue came next
Second, the gender dimension.
Feminist or affirmative.
At this time, you may retort, why are women's rights and equality opposites?
Don't dwell on it yet.
Here's just a literal translation of the show.
Sir looked at the back and felt that this refers to the view of the current situation of society:
If you think that the reality is unfair and that women should be empowered, that's "feminism"; If you feel that men and women are already equal, and it is okay to maintain the current situation, then it is "equal rights".
You may also say, doesn't gender determine the position on this issue?
Wrong.
For example, if you look at the young lady below, her "gender latitude" is right (that is, "equal" direction): +2, which is more prominent than other latitudes.
You'd say she's a "female traitor".
Wrong again.
Sharp-eyed viewers still have the impression that this is not the guard in "The Call of the Siren"?
The first female security officer in the presidential guard room of Korea is cool and sassy, quite capable of fighting, but many female viewers are attracted to her and regard her as a role model of female power.
△ The demeanor of the female guard in "The Call of the Siren".
As a result, as soon as the position is revealed, why did it "collapse"?
Here's what's interesting about the show:
Can you judge someone else's qualities simply by their position?
Is there a reason why other people have different ideas from you?
You might as well watch her performance in the show and then make a judgment.
In contrast, another female guest, Hippopotamus.
A feminist through and through.
In the coordinate system, her feminist index is full: -3.
Graduated from Seoul National University, participated in feminist activities, and is a documentary writer in the field of feminism.
Want to be a herbivore though
But it is a violent and tough hippopotamus
The third dimension is class.
Commoner or rich.
Commoners who grew up in lower income levels are commoners, and those who grew up in an economically affluent environment are wealthy.
So Michael, whose parents are both professors, has attended countless cram classes from art to Chinese; There are also hippos that "everything in the house is a luxury except for food".
But for the attitude towards the economy, Sir noticed a detail.
Genie, an elite staff member who studied in the United Kingdom in high school, studied at the University of Hong Kong, had the highest rich score, showing an extremely self-consistent meritocracy.
Try it out
It's all mine in the end anyway
But a family of six sleeps in a single room, and the dark knight has rats in the house all year round.
Born in the special forces, it is typical to rely on personal efforts to get out of the life path of the bottom life.
Receiving the highest civilian value, indicating that this is not the civilian world, he did not turn to the leftist who pursued welfare and distribution, but chose to believe in the ultimate in personal efforts.
I definitely don't blame the environment
What I do best is acceptance
At last.
Fourth, the dimension of openness.
The test is attitudes towards traditional moral norms.
The content is multifaceted, such as new things, sexual minorities, lifestyles, etc.
In general, if you can accept the different and embrace the individuality, then go to the left.
On the contrary, more emphasis is placed on obedience to the collective spirit, family order, and cultural customs, then to the right.
Men are not the only ones standing on the right. (similar to the image of a patriarch)
For example, hockey coach Gao Aixin, who has lived a relatively conservative group life since he was a child, is difficult to understand those who are individualistic.
In the same way, standing on the right, the opposite of openness is not necessarily bad.
They just feel that traditional values still deserve to be valued today.
For example, J.K. Rowling argues that gender is objective, and that a person whose biological sex is male cannot claim to be female and enter the women's restroom.
She may not be open and "up to date" enough, but her traditional ideas are not vexatious.
In short, what Sir has repeatedly emphasized is:
In each of these dimensions, you may be able to seat yourself in the right seat.
But be wary of classifying people who have different views from you as "bad people."
Because between every coordinate, there is no absolute correctness.
opposite
Difference is the essence of the world.
Isn't this the meaning of existence for such a show?
A micro-society composed of people with different ideas was born.
02
Ideas can't support you to the end
can get a high score of 9.5 on Douban, this variety show is naturally not an empty gimmick.
It does not get bogged down in a war of binary opposing ideas.
Compared with variety shows, it is more like a political fable that exposes the laws of social coexistence and operation.
The key points are:
Its game mechanics and rules.
In addition to the usual survival, elimination, and prize money that are customary in survival games, this show adds two core rules: voting for leaders and thought verification.
During these nine days, leaders are voted on each day, and the leaders manage the assignment of tasks, daily expenses, taxes, etc.
Ideological verification is to guess other people's political tendencies and their scores to attack the other party, and if others guess the right thoughts, they will be directly eliminated.
The leader has a knockout ticket.
So, how to win?
The show has already given a clear path: either become a leader and form your own power; Either elect your own accomplices as leaders.
How do you mobilize this group of people with different views and make them collide with each other?
It's simple, penny.
Everyone needs an initial game start-up capital.
12 people, a total of 20 million.
How is it distributed?
Distribute it yourself in order and feel free to take what you want out of twenty million.
How to take it?
There are no rules, you can take it however you want.
Theoretically, if you are first in line, you can take all 20 million.
but
If you do this, it is equivalent to offending everyone behind you, and then you will definitely lose the next link.
Therefore, there are no rules on the surface, but each has a set of unspoken rules in their hearts.
Let's divide it evenly.
In this way, each person can get 166 or 1.67 million.
The Dark Knight was the first to stand up and say that he was willing to be the first to go in and promised to take only 1.6 million.
Superman then gets up and says he's the last.
Everyone lined up in order, and when it was time to enter the amount, they found that the show was really good at doing things:
Only the whole hundred numbers can be entered!
Then everyone will not be able to get the same amount.
100, 200, 300, if it were you, how much would you take?
Superman is worthy of being a politician, and he deliberately throws a smoke bomb that his personal funds may be seen by others, so that everyone does not dare to act as a "villain".
This trick is also very effective, except for the Dark Knight who made the guarantee, a total of 6 people only took 1 million.
The penultimate entered, as a "political enemy", White Bear, when he saw the remaining amount of 5 million, he chose to take 2 million and leave Superman with 3 million.
The last person who everyone expected to suffer the most became one of the people who took the most money.
Genie, who had just been elected as the leader, hoped to be the first to go in and get all the 20 million, but she had to show goodwill at this moment and automatically claimed the last remaining position. I regretted it afterwards, knowing that there was so much left, I should have taken another 1 million.
It can be seen that although there are different views and positions, in survival games, people often choose to put on the mask of society and change their acting style and ideological tendencies out of practical considerations.
The highlight of the show is the "disguised" reality show?
Of course not only.
In the evening, there was an anonymous debate tournament that revolved around the four dimensions.
"Wonderful Saying" + "Werewolf Kill" a set of combination punches.
During the day, before the conflict is revealed, everyone works together to govern the community and communicate with each other to maintain a semblance of harmony.
A bombshell was dropped directly at dinner, previewing the theme of tonight's debate:
"It's a natural perception that men who spend more on dating are considered sexy." "There are certain periods of national development that require capable dictators." "The greatest responsibility for poverty lies with oneself."
Looking at these debate topics, you can know that Han Zong really dares to talk about it.
In the evening, through anonymous IDs, they were able to express their political leanings to their heart's content, and the differences in their thinking were revealed during the debate competition.
03
Camp, can't stand the hearts of the people
This variety show uses character settings that are completely in line with our cognition, typical to the point of even tending to be face-painted, bringing us facts outside of cognition:
The reason for unity and division is often not due to political stance.
For example, the fastest "small group" to form is the "smoking squad" of men.
For example, White Bear and Superman, who are political enemies of each other, do not always go toe-to-toe, but because of the same political background, the two can see each other's strengths and recommend and support each other in elections.
And the female alliance between the white bear and the hippopotamus that the audience with God's perspective is very much looking forward to seeing, but they frequently contradict each other.
They were not able to unite simply by identifying each other with similar political positions, and the White Bear was wary of the hippopotamus' active overtures, which helped to "frame" the hippopotamus in the final lifetime leadership election cycle.
This variety show uses its social observation to tell you:
The labelling of personal tendencies pointed to by this test does not mean that a person will behave in this way, nor does it fully indicate that a person is the same.
A person's specific choice at a certain moment or issue often transcends a position.
People in real-world contexts are much more complex.
In fact, many guests do not always show the side of the label.
Sugar, who previously opposed women's rights and advocated safeguarding the interests of her wealthy, chose White Bear, which is inclined to protect the interests of the disadvantaged, in the subsequent election of White Bear VS Superman.
This does not mean that her political stance is shaken, she still said that in society she will choose a leader like Superman to protect her interests, but in this game the survival conditions have changed, out of consideration for the bonuses she has and the problem of survival, she chooses the white bear who has a greater probability of solving the actual predicament.
Michael and Hippo, rappers and feminist writers who oppose feminism, have diametrically opposed political leanings.
But because of the kindness released by the hippo, the two were able to understand and communicate, and later Michael also said that he felt that he was slowly growing through the debate.
After standing in the position that you need to defend yourself
I myself was somehow convinced
Only to realize that my preconceptions were so terrible
What's even more exciting is that Sir feels that it provides a complex life from a specific and subtle perspective that is difficult to see in literary and artistic works.
For example, the gap between the rich and the poor and the class issue are far more than superficial gimmicks, but provide a more realistic observation and reflection.
In the task answer, the program team put forward the concept of "real life perception", asking some basic livelihood issues, such as the price of movie tickets, the price of garbage bags, the income of veterans, the number of households with one person and one household in the country, and the number of convenience stores in Seoul.
But politicians, wealthy big data researchers, and wealthy people living in high-end neighborhoods who are always exposed to these issues and concepts without touching on them in their lives are ignorant of these specific life details.
Even more thought-provoking is a hippopotamus debate about the nature of poverty.
Why the discussion about poverty
It is often carried out by non-poor people
When the annual salary was announced, there were people with an annual salary of more than 300 million won, and everyone applauded and cheered.
The hippo said, "I felt like I was facing a huge wall." It turned out that the fact that I was poor, I got a forced confirmation through others.
In addition to food, clothing, shelter and transportation in our family,
Everything is luxury
But after I went to college
I felt that there was a greater gap in culture and knowledge
This is a very different aspect of my parents' livelihood
That's what makes life better, easier and more comfortable,
It turns out that their lives enjoy these things
They also take it as their own power
Ignore those who don't have these
In today's world, we face many of these walls.
Therefore, it is often difficult to carry out dialogue and correction in terms of positions or tendencies between the differences and conflicts of ideas between them.
Any kind of thought and choice, even something that we cannot understand, regardless of right or wrong, has a specific context in which it is formed.
One of Sir's most impressive scenes.
For the first time, the camera swept over the buildings of this community, and in the window frames, everyone seemed to be not a living individual, but a part of this prison, under endless surveillance.
It's a circular prison entirely.
Sir wanted to make the same exclamation as the guests.
Bentham's circular prison was surrounded by a ring with a watchtower in the center, and the watchman could monitor all the prisoners in front of the ring, but the prisoners could not be sure whether they were being watched.
△ Stettville Correctional Center, United States
Foucault likened modern society to a circular prison.
Under the discipline society, everyone is in the surveillance network, constrained by various disciplines and systems, and "surveillance" is not only an external compulsion, but also an internal spontaneous discipline.
In voting for the leader candidates and choosing to attack others, they find that if they are all in the room with the curtains closed, everyone's actions can be seen, so that the subject of surveillance becomes themselves, thus ensuring that no one is attacked.
It's some kind of metaphor that the show inadvertently creates.
There are different aspects of things, adjust different perspectives, break the external surveillance, and the communication between people still exists instantly.
This also means that in the complex context of reality, it is useless to verify and correct the "ideological conclusions" that everyone has reached, but rather imply the intention of threatening or even attacking.
Instead, we need consensus, we need public dialogue, and we need to see specific people.
Otherwise.
Round after round of hot searches, constant splits, and mutual attacks, will there be winners?
Perhaps, only the reapers of traffic will win.
The others, on the other hand, were just beaten and bloodied, and they were just competing to be sacrificed to the table.
The picture in this article comes from the Internet
Editor's Assistant: Xiao Yu, who doesn't like fish
#寻找热爱表达的你#