Commentator: Wang Xiaona
Don't compare Barbie dolls with figurines with edge-rubbing shapes, Barbie dolls don't scratch their heads.
According to the "Rule of Law Daily", Xiao Yin, a high school student in Chongqing, as a senior "two-dimensional" enthusiast, recently found that a large number of hand-made goods displayed on the membership purchase interface of a website were exposed, and the introduction led people to reverie: "You can't look there!" "The figure shows the female character wearing underwear and changing clothes in the mirror;" At midnight, when I opened the bathroom door, I found my sister taking a bath...... "The figure is a female character who is changing clothes, and her buttocks are half exposed......
In recent years, various animation works and game works have blossomed, some of which are popular among minors, and "two-dimensional" works and their derivative peripherals are also sought after. Online and offline, there are scantily clad and indecent handicrafts for sale, and some anime with vulgar content and pornographic edges quietly flow to minors.
What are the effects of these things on minors? Some figurines are sexually suggestive, some anime have an ethically breaking plot, and there are even scenes of sexual violence. Minors are still mentally immature and have little social experience, and when they pursue these products, it is easy to fall into the trap of soft pornography and obscene information, and their sexual cognition will be distorted, and even lead to the evil consequences of breaking the law and committing crimes.
When the "Rule of Law Daily" mentioned in the report that these products should be regulated, many netizens defended them, "It's talking about sexual perversion again", "Always avoiding sex education", "Early love is not allowed, and growing up to urge marriage is fanatical", "It is recommended to abstain from sex nationwide......
It can be seen from these comments that many netizens are afraid that the relevant departments will end their "happy hometown" for the maintenance of peripheral products, but their remarks are inevitably suspected of confusing concepts, avoiding the important and trivial, and exaggerating the arguments.
Using "sex education" to justify pornographic figurines is illogical, just like you can't buy a bicycle in a vegetable market. Sex education is not a reason to spread soft pornography, and real sex education is not to play with a few toys with seductive gestures, nor to browse those ethical confusion, violent and obscene plots, but to understand scientific physiological knowledge with respect and awe.
The "two-dimensional" peripheral market is rich in products, what kind of figure is beautiful, and how much nudity is erotic? The line between beauty and vulgarity, vivid and obscene is blurred. We need the relevant departments to formulate industry standards, classify them, review them when they are launched, and also need the sales platform to consciously label the prompt information and treat it with caution when encountering underage customers.
The figure can be played, and the shape can be beautiful, but the boundary must be kept.