Lead
"I think I will live until 2030, when humanity will have eternal life."
The famous American scientist Ray Kuzweil once again made a prediction that mankind will achieve immortality in 2030.
In a recent interview, he once again touched on this topic, saying that the realization of human immortality will be in 2030.
As soon as this sentence was issued, it attracted global attention.
And Rekuzwil's previous words seem to be at this time, so will humanity really achieve immortality in 2030?
1. The prophecy of Rickuzville.
"I think I will live until 2030, when humanity will have eternal life."
He is a famous American physicist, biologist, astrophysicist, neuroscientist, artificial intelligence scientist, computer engineer, medical scientist, chemist, neurologist, brain scientist, biochemist and other more than ten disciplines for Ph.D., as well as a number of Nobel Prize winners, he is the famous American scientist Ray Kuzweil.
And what he said has also attracted global attention, and he has been making countless efforts for the future of mankind.
In Rekuzwil's prophecy, he believes that human civilization will undergo unprecedented changes in the near future, and he believes that around 2045, humanity will achieve eternal life.
And he frequently promotes this idea to the world, and even more, he believes that the realization of human immortality will be around 2030.
So why did Rekuzwil have this prophecy?
How did he come up with this prophecy?
What kind of theories did his prophecy base on?
2. The prophecy of the origin of life.
"Humanity will achieve immortality by 2030."
This is an unfounded prophecy, but Rickuzweil's prophecy is backed up by his own set of theories.
And this theory comes from the study of the origin of life.
Before the 20th century, the study of the origin of life continued, but there was no result, and every research ended in failure.
The earliest research on the origin of life can be traced back to the ancient Greek period, when Aristotle conducted a profound discussion on the origin of life.
He believed that life could be divided into three different levels: plants, animals, and humans, and that these three classes had different characteristics.
In Aristotle's view, life is a substance, and once this substance is lost, life disappears and life ceases to exist.
And in the city of Vitruna, there is a prominent figure, and he is Epida.
He explores the origin of life, arguing that life is a substance, but not just a substance, but also a principle.
And this principle is "natural" and "unnatural".
The origin of human beings is made up of four substances, and these four substances are fire, water, air, and earth.
And human beings are made up of four substances and one principle, and this principle is "consciousness", so the emergence of human beings is composed of five things.
Of these five things, all are life, so human beings are made up of life.
And these five things are not only life, but also a substance, so human beings are also a substance.
Human beings are made up of these five things, so human beings are also a kind of life.
Epi discussed the five substances in life, and he believed that human beings are composed of five substances, so human beings are also a kind of life.
The origin of humanity is made up of these five things.
Of these five things, there is one thing that is unstable, and that thing is consciousness.
The emergence of human beings was born out of consciousness in these five things, and of these five things, only water is a sign of life, and nothing else is a sign of life.
Epi's initial view was wrong, that the origin of mankind was not made up of five substances, but of an infinite number of substances, so the origin of humanity was made up of an infinite number of substances.
In the origin of human beings, there are not only water, but also air, earth, fire and countless other substances, so the origin of human beings is composed of countless substances.
The origin of human beings is not made up of five substances.
In the 18th century, the origin of life was discussed, and they believed that human beings were composed of carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen, and other substances, which were all signs of life.
In the 20th century, the origin of life was deeply explored, and they believed that life was a substance, but not only a substance, but also a principle.
In Rekuzwil's view, he argues that life is a substance, but not only a substance, but also a principle, and this principle is "natural" and "unnatural".
Rekuzwil explores the origin of life, arguing that life is a substance, but not only a substance, but also a principle.
In the 50s of the 20th century, the American scientist Miller explored the origin of life.
3. Experiments on the origin of life.
In the 50s of the 20th century, the American scientist Miller discussed the origin of life, and he used Vitruna's views to study the origin of life.
In the 60s of the 20th century, the American scientist Bauer explored the origin of life.
He believed that the origin of life was made up of biomolecules, which in turn were made up of atoms.
In the 60s of the 20th century, the American scientist Bauer discussed the origin of life, and he believed that the origin of life was composed of biomolecules, and biomolecules were made up of atoms.
IV. Experiments on the Origin of Life.
To prove his point, he conducted a series of experiments in which he first composed primordial oceans with carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen, and other substances, and then heated them with high temperatures.
At high temperatures, the substances in the primordial ocean underwent a chemical reaction that eventually formed biomolecules.
Among biomolecules, one substance is DNA, which is a substance that stores genetic information.
In Rekuzwil's view, he argues that life is a substance, but not only a substance, but also a principle, and that principle is "natural" and "unnatural."