#头条创作挑战赛#
For your better reading and interactive experience, in order for you to see more content in time, click "Follow" We update wonderful stories and share different story moments for you every day
Text: Rushed forward
Edit|Rush forward
It is said that the entertainment industry has recently been stirred up by a strange incident - the well-known singer Liang Long was at the recording site of the reality show "Singer 2024", but because of the obstruction of stool, it aroused enthusiastic onlookers and comments on the whole network.
As soon as this incident was exposed, it quickly set off a scene of sudden changes on the Internet and the anger of the government and the opposition. I saw that hardcore fans were filled with righteous indignation, controlled righteousness, and spoke out for their idols one after another.
And the onlookers who follow the wind and waves are laughing and laughing, and there is no lack of shameful and grotesque ridicule, which is indeed quite a plot of some rondols. Even if we are in the right trap, even if we are sharp and deep, we must have a fair and selfless heart, and then take a glimpse of it first, and then directly touch the strange circle of this strange fate in the entertainment industry.
Popular idols suffer from embarrassment
Diplodocus used to be well-known in the industry, but in recent years, it has gradually entered the trend of half-decline in middle age. And this time, the fact that he was trapped in the stage recording was blocked was simply a "public embarrassment" that disgraced him. As soon as the picture was exposed, the onlookers laughed, and there was no shortage of ridicule and sarcasm:
"No wonder I've been in good spirits when I sing on stage, it turns out that I'm holding back a bubble of urine!"
"I wrote a song overnight, and some netizens left a message asking the second-hand roses to sing something evil and send them away directly to foreign friends."
Although fans are full of sorrow and pity, in the eyes of others, it has become an excellent object of ridicule and entertainment.
But what is wrong with this popular idol? He's just a mortal, and it's only natural that he wants to go to the toilet. A huge stage for singers did not give such a basic physiological need a reasonable outlet.
Even if you are recording in the spotlight, do you have to roll around and pee yourself in public? Liang Long could only ask the staff for help, but was directly rejected and forced to return to his original position. Judging from this scene, the staff did deal with it too stiffly and lacked the necessary empathy and human consideration.
Being forced to hold urine on the spot is also a human rights violation
I can't help but reflect on whether treating an artist who works on the scene in this way has violated the minimum personal dignity and work rights? Even if it is out of work needs, the program team should not obstruct a person's most basic toilet needs at all, which has undoubtedly violated and trampled on the basic rights of artists.
It is reported that the recording time of Diplodocus that night lasted for more than 4 hours, during which he was completely deprived of the freedom to go to the toilet. In other words, how do we feel in this situation?
I'm afraid that even the slightest bit of professional ethics and responsibility will be lost. Failing to meet a person's minimum toilet needs is a blatant human rights violation and abuse in the workplace.
"Our Diplodocus boss is not so easy to get rid of, insisting 'I want to go to SN'. The staff didn't let him go, and Liang Long could only give up, sitting back in place aggrievedly, and muttering, 'It's okay if I don't cut this shot'. "
It is precisely because of Lianglong's repeated insistence and rights protection that this trivial matter, which was deliberately ignored, has aroused widespread attention and heated discussions among the whole people. As an artist, he should not only get basic personal rights and job security, but also be humanized by the organizational unit. Instead of treating it like this, he does not hesitate to "force diapers" and other extreme behaviors.
Some people also argue that in order to ensure the coherence of the program, some necessary control is needed, but is it just for an advertising space to treat a living person so extremely?
It's really hard to understand and accept. Even a little physiological freedom while waiting in the background has to be so strictly deprived and contained, which is inevitably a bit distorted and paranoid.
Appropriate delegation of authority should be given to on-the-job front-line personnel
I thought that on such an occasion of being insulted, if Liang Long really peed his pants in public, he could take the opportunity to trigger a "human rights protection" movement in the entertainment industry.
After all, the most basic rights and interests of a worker cannot be guaranteed, which has indeed touched a basic human rights red line, which cannot be trampled on and ignored at will.
Diplodocus is considered lucky, the environment is relatively good, and there is still a glimmer of life. But what about the situation of other artists in the industry? They struggle for word of mouth and livelihood all the time, and under layers of pressure, they sometimes inevitably suffer all kinds of inhumane treatment.
Sometimes I can't help but think: Why do these hard-working artists, although they are in the entertainment industry, be part of the laborers after all, so why do they have to be reduced to such a difficult situation?
For the sake of the current interests and rules, why is it so contrary to human ethics and the bottom line? It can be seen that in some details, the industry authorities should give front-line workers appropriate autonomy and delegation of power, and demonstrate basic humanistic care.
Only in this way, even small things, will not ferment into an accident and hidden dangers. After all, whether we are artists or not, we are all individuals who need to be treated fairly and with basic respect. A healthy and positive industry environment must be built on reasonable and humanized management.
Netizen comment area
Around the matter of Diplodocus, there was naturally an uproar on the Internet. Some people sympathize with the injustice suffered by Liang Long, and some people ridicule it:
"No wonder you sing so hard, it turns out that you are holding back your strength!"
"Why don't you let him pee on the spot, maybe it can become a new form of artistic performance?"
"Even a big name like Diplodocus has been treated like this, which shows the sinister unspoken rules of the entertainment industry, which is really disturbing."
From the side, although these comments are somewhat exaggerated and absurd, they also reflect the public's dissatisfaction and helplessness with some bad habits within the industry. Even a respected senior artist has to endure such humble and unfair treatment, which shows that this has indeed reflected some institutional stubborn diseases.
While others pointed to the core of the problem:
"In the final analysis, this matter is to use the artist as a marionette, how can it be fair? Even if it's for the effect of the show, you can't completely ignore the humane care. "
"These old habits in the industry have been ingrained, and someone should really give them a headache!"
It can be seen that everyone has mixed views and opinions on the Liang Dragon incident. However, it is undeniable that this incident has triggered a reflection on the unreasonable rules within the industry in the whole society, and the protection of the rights and interests of artists needs to be paid attention to and reformed urgently.
Equal attention is paid to the protection of rights and interests and industry self-discipline
For the irrationality of the internal management of the industry, it is impossible to fundamentally solve the problem by simply shouting. After all, the formation of the existing rules has gone through many years of industry development.
How to ensure the effect of the program while also ensuring the basic rights and interests of artists is decently protected, which is indeed a systematic project, which requires the joint reflection and action of the whole industry. We must not always pursue our personal interests in a simple and crude way, and at the same time, we must avoid slogans and appeals that are mere rhetorical rhetoric.
Only when relevant government departments and industry associations formulate practical industry self-discipline and safeguard mechanisms, and promote the implementation of rules through effective supervision and punishment, can this problem be fundamentally solved. At the same time, it also requires artists to have the courage to stand up and speak out for the protection of rights and interests, and defend the rights they deserve with courage and responsibility.
There is no doubt that the Lianglong incident has become a fuse for the internal reform of the industry, and there should be more such cases in the future, so as to truly make the demand for rights and interests protection become a torrent that cannot be ignored.
For ordinary audiences, entertainment can no longer be regarded as a pure pastime, but should be re-examined with a rational and empathetic vision of some unreasonable bad habits and drawbacks within the film and television industry, and use their own voice and power to promote change.
Only in this way will the strange thing of Diplodocus "being forced to diaper" not continue to repeat and happen in the future. The development of the industry will eventually move towards a more civilized, rational and humane stage.