A tank of fuel with a range of 2000km is a false standard? BYD is so bold!
Theatre Man
2024-05-29 15:35Posted on the official account of Guangdong Opera Car People
If those old fritter car companies that eat fuel-efficient old books watched BYD's "2 Times" press conference in Xi'an last night, can they still lie down and make money and dream of laughing?

21 years ago, BYD acquired Qinchuan Automobile in Xi'an, obtained a birth permit to start the road to make a car, and the evaluation of the industry at that time was: A battery maker ran to build a car, and threatened to build an electric car? At that time, which car giant in the world was successful in building electric cars?
16 years ago, BYD thought clearly about one thing, limited by materials and technology at the time, it was unrealistic for the market to build an electric car in one step. Hybrid is a very good transition plan, but at this time, the hybrid patent has been firmly controlled, and if you can't bypass the planetary gear patent technology, no matter what you do, you will be making a wedding dress for others.
So the world's first plug-in hybrid car F3DM was born, also in Xi'an.
Nowadays, China has become the world's highest-selling plug-in hybrid model market, and even for every 2 plug-in hybrid vehicles sold, 1 is BYD, and plug-in hybrid cars are gradually going abroad and exported overseas, conquering the city for China's automobile industry.
BYD's DM technology has also reached the fifth generation, and now BYD is led by Qin Zhi, who swept six synthesies to dominate the industry, returned to Xi'an Fudi, and released the fifth-generation DM technology that is mass-produced, but it is falsely marked on the data of running 2000km on a tank of oil?
BYD Qin L/Seal 06 on the market, the two models are sister models to each other, the highlight is naturally the fifth-generation DM-i, the technical compression ratio is 16:1, what needs to be solved is how to resist knocking and not increase the burden of high-priced oil products for everyone to refuel.
They adopt technologies such as high-energy ignition, high-tumbling air ducts, intelligent EFI systems, pre-urging EGR, intelligent split cooling, and intelligent variable lubrication, and finally achieve the highest thermal efficiency of 46.06% in the world's mass production.
The two cars can be understood as having the same base except for the different configurations of the exterior and interior, similar to the different names of the same cars from Toyota, Honda, and Volkswagen.
Therefore, both cars are 1.5L plug-in hybrid systems, of which the 1.5L engine has a maximum power of 74kW, using lithium iron phosphate batteries from Fodi Power as energy storage devices, and the matching EHS electric hybrid system is divided into EHS120 (120kW/210N·m) and EHS160 (160kW/260N·m), corresponding to a new generation of plug-in hybrid special blade batteries of 10.08kWh and 15.87kWh respectively, with 80 km, Two all-electric range versions of 120 km are available.
At first glance, the parameter data is not surprising, but as long as you bring a full fuel and full battery, the battery life is really outrageous.
Can you run 2000km with full fuel and full power? This battery life has to be called an industrial miracle by netizens, right?
Roughly calculated, if there is a charging pile family, if you drive this car to run 20,000 kilometers a year, you can save nearly 10,000 yuan more than other cars of the same level, and now who will think that it is useless to save 10,000 yuan more?
What's even more outrageous is that this battery life is a false standard from the results measured in advance by various media.
That's right, it's a reverse false standard.
From low altitude to high altitude, the whole uphill road can do better than 2000km, and even more than 2500km at most, the average fuel consumption is more than 2L, and even less than 2L.
Even if we live the belly of a gentleman with the heart of a villain, we think that these media are attracted by recharged/competition rewards, and all use extremely fuel-efficient methods, such as low speeds, try not to step on the brakes, etc.
That's a real hard time, with an average range of more than 2300km.
Even if you sell the two cars of 998, the range will be less than this, but it's always okay to run 1500km, right?
What does this mean? The energy consumption and price of these two cars are the joint venture B-class medium-sized cars that are losing upward, and the joint venture A+ class family cars that are losing price downward.
There is still strength left in front of this, and I am afraid that there is another cost master Wuling Starlight.
The penetration rate of new energy in the mainland automobile market has exceeded 50%, although the Internet is still full of all kinds of remarks that "oil cars are orthodox", "trams have no soul", and "kill and don't buy trams". But the market performance is very honest, and the consumers who pay for it with real money are also very honest to themselves, who gives me more, makes me more saving, and who I buy.
Therefore, this night, a few years later, may be recorded as the node of the new energy officially overtaking in the oil and electricity dispute, which is the trend of the times, not those personal network public opinion can stop.
As for those old fritter joint venture car companies that are still not enterprising and lying on the credit book, they absorbed enough from consumers back then, and there is no need to be sad for them, and the survival of the fittest is normal.
View original image 136K
-
A tank of fuel with a range of 2000km is a false standard? BYD is so bold! -
A tank of fuel with a range of 2000km is a false standard? BYD is so bold! -
A tank of fuel with a range of 2000km is a false standard? BYD is so bold! -
A tank of fuel with a range of 2000km is a false standard? BYD is so bold! -
A tank of fuel with a range of 2000km is a false standard? BYD is so bold! -
A tank of fuel with a range of 2000km is a false standard? BYD is so bold! -
A tank of fuel with a range of 2000km is a false standard? BYD is so bold!