laitimes

Why did the "second-hand rose" Diplodocus be eliminated from the singer stage, they must be criticized

author:Crazy little rocket

Hey, that's kind of funny. On the recent "Singer 2024", the second-hand rose Liang Long sang a "Ode to Sister-in-law", but this song is so interesting to listen to, but it sent them directly out of the competition. This made the audience a little confused, what is wrong with this song, we have to talk about it in detail.

Why did the "second-hand rose" Diplodocus be eliminated from the singer stage, they must be criticized

Let's talk about second-hand roses first, this is not a small roadside band, they are famous in rock circles, especially the unique voice of Diplodocus, which sings one accurately. But this time on the stage of "Singer 2024", they unexpectedly planted a big heel.

This "Ode to Sister-in-law" is actually an old song, and the original song dates back to the ending song of the TV series in 1991. It sounds quite old, but this time Liang Long sang this song, it is not a simple cover. He stood on the stage for seven and a half minutes, singing over and over again, with a little pleading and a little shouting in his voice, that scene is really fresh in people's memory.

Why did the "second-hand rose" Diplodocus be eliminated from the singer stage, they must be criticized

But here's the problem, the style of this song and the atmosphere of the scene are completely incompatible. I think that back then, when the first performance was held, the audience could still follow along, but this time, the lighting, stage design and this song made the whole atmosphere very weird. The audience was at a loss, and even had the urge to fast-forward. You say, is this singing or telling a ghost story?

And the audience of this song is also very problematic. Considering that there were many young and foreign audiences at the scene, the 1991 song was too foreign to them. Many people may not even know where the original song came from, let alone resonate.

Why did the "second-hand rose" Diplodocus be eliminated from the singer stage, they must be criticized

Even foreign singers have to ask what the meaning of translating the lyrics is, the "sister-in-law" in the lyrics, foreigners are confused when they hear it, and the background and cultural differences of the lyrics are really not good if they don't explain.

The audience's reaction directly affects the outcome of the vote. The performance of second-hand roses this time obviously failed to impress the audience, and it is no wonder that they will be eliminated in the end.

Why did the "second-hand rose" Diplodocus be eliminated from the singer stage, they must be criticized

There is also a lot of discussion on the Internet, and some people think that they are asking for it, after all, who made you have to choose such an old-fashioned song. But there are also many fans who expressed their disappointment, and they were expecting to see more performances of second-hand roses on this stage.

Diplodocus's performance this time also made some old fans feel sorry. After all, in previous performances, second-hand roses always surprised and shocked everyone. But this time, it seems that it was a wrong bet and chose an inappropriate track, which turned out to be a sense of distance.

Why did the "second-hand rose" Diplodocus be eliminated from the singer stage, they must be criticized

chose "Ode to My Sister-in-law", although this song has its historical significance, it seems a little out of place in the context of current pop music. Maybe they were trying to express some kind of musical originality in this way, or try to win the hearts of the judges and the audience with a retro style, but it was clear that this strategy didn't work out.

That night's performance, Diplodocus's status on stage was also quite controversial. His expressions and body language seem to tell a story, but such representations don't communicate well with the audience. Although his sometimes low and sometimes passionate voice shows his musical skills, it fails to achieve the desired effect in conveying emotions.

Why did the "second-hand rose" Diplodocus be eliminated from the singer stage, they must be criticized

This incident is undoubtedly a major blow to second-hand roses. As veteran rock bands, they have won the love of countless music fans with their unique music style and uninhibited stage performance. As the music market continues to change and so do the tastes of audiences, this failure could be a sign that they need to re-examine themselves and adjust their strategies.

The acceptance of music, as a way of expressing emotions and art, depends not only on the expression of the performers, but also on the audience's acceptance and the current cultural background. Although the second-hand rose did not come to fruition, it also brought a kind of thinking to the pop music stage: how to make the music work more in line with the aesthetic habits of the public while maintaining its personality and artistry.

Why did the "second-hand rose" Diplodocus be eliminated from the singer stage, they must be criticized

The disappointment of fans, the ridicule of opponents, the in-depth analysis of music critics, various voices come together to show a diverse music stage. This phenomenon also reflects the increasingly diverse public response to cultural products in modern society, who are not only satisfied with superficial appreciation, but are more willing to delve into the cultural and artistic values behind music.

Why did the "second-hand rose" Diplodocus be eliminated from the singer stage, they must be criticized

Returning to the fate of Secondhand Rose and Diplodocus, this stage loss may have been just a small episode in their musical journey. A true artist always learns from his failures and keeps improving and breaking through. We have reason to believe that Second-Hand Rose will bring this experience back to the road of music and bring more touching works.

Read on