A lot of colleges and universities have problems, and they always make an announcement that they have set up a task force to investigate the matter. Then there was no more to it again. Netizens like to speculate that eighty percent of schools use procrastination, and when no one pays attention to the matter, no one will remember this matter, such as Jia Qianqian, such as the graduate student who was to be admitted to Beijing University of Technology before he was going to stab a male student, and now how many people know the result of the matter?
However, although there is a problem of tampering with the results of Xi'an University of Science and Technology, the results of the processing are made public very quickly, and I praise the school.
A teaching performance change incident at Xi'an University of Science and Technology has attracted our attention. If it weren't for a principled teacher, no one would know about it, and then this case of using personal rights to violate fairness would have been done.
And now, just a few days later, Xi'an University of Science and Technology has quickly launched an investigation and issued a timely briefing.
The bulletin detailed the results of the two students' make-up examinations. Among them, Chen Moumou obtained a score of 89 points after the make-up examination, and after verification, the score was true and valid. Another student, Wang Moumou, originally scored 56 points in the make-up examination, but then the score was changed to 60 points by the academic clerk Zhang Moumou and the course leader Chen without authorization. The school deems this change to be invalid.
In response to this incident, Xi'an University of Science and Technology has taken drastic measures. According to the report, the teaching clerk Zhang Moumou was punished with a demerit and was transferred from his original post because he was involved in a first-level teaching accident. Chen, the leader of the course, was dismissed from the position of the course leader due to a third-level teaching accident. At the same time, Jing, the vice dean in charge of teaching, was also warned and punished for a third-level teaching accident. In addition, the Dean of the College was given a warning.
This series of measures demonstrates the school's zero-tolerance attitude towards teaching accidents and academic misconduct. In accordance with the relevant regulations on the staff of public institutions, a total of 2 people were punished with demerits, 2 were given warnings, 1 was transferred from their posts, and 1 was dismissed. This kind of handling undoubtedly sends a clear signal to the outside world: Xi'an University of Science and Technology will not disappoint everyone and will resolutely uphold the principle of fairness and justice in education.
Netizens agreed with the results of the incident, but also raised some questions. Some netizens questioned that the report did not clearly state who instructed the revision of the results. In addition, some netizens speculated whether the school would take the initiative to deal with the matter if there was no intervention report from the central media. But that's all speculation.
However, for the first question, although the report does not directly specify who instructed the revision of the results, it can be roughly inferred from the severity of the punishment who exactly is involved, and even if the details of the investigation are not disclosed, we can guess who it is.
However, for the first student who passed the make-up examination, it also made everyone have some doubts, because this student was the student whose parents claimed that he had a background in the academician team. The passing of the make-up examination also made many netizens speculate whether the background of this parent played a role. In fact, it would be best if the parent's team could be disclosed in the survey.
Author's point of view:
Personally, I think that this punishment is not very severe, it is not very serious for most participants, and it will take some time to get back. But it's also good news.
This incident is not only a punishment for those involved, but also a wake-up call for the entire education system. It reminds university administrators that educational equity and academic integrity are the lifeblood of their schools and that this red line should not be touched at any time.
If colleges and universities cannot adhere to the original intention and mission of education, and maintain the fairness and academic integrity of education, then the university will only get narrower and narrower. Only by being fair and fair can we cultivate truly talented and moral high-quality talents