Recently, there was a "durian door" incident that aroused heated discussions on the Internet. A blogger posted a self-exposing video on Weibo, saying that she bought durian three times this week and was scolded by her husband all night. This seemingly ordinary short film has caused widespread discussion among netizens. What do you think about this event?
Loading...
The cause of the incident was that the blogger posted a short video saying that he bought durian three times this week, but was counted down by her husband, accusing her of "making herself very tired". The reason is that the cost of the three durian flowers is nearly 500 yuan, plus the decoration expenses at home, my husband feels that the cost is a bit big. The blogger hopes to make netizens support her through a short video, thinking that "everyone lives to eat and drink", and her husband should not be overly careful.
However, netizens did not agree on this incident. Some people support the blogger's point of view, believing that "if you have money, you should spend it", and the husband should not be too stingy. But more netizens have different views, and they analyze this incident from the following perspectives:
Whether it is appropriate to eat durian three times a week depends on the family income.
Not to mention the rest, it doesn't get hot if you eat it three times a week
You still have to have money and confidence, otherwise you have to look at your face if you want to eat
First, the economic situation of the family should be determined jointly. 500 yuan may not be a large amount for individual families, but for families with average incomes, it is indeed a large expense. As a wife, you should be considerate of your husband's fatigue and financial pressure, and should not make unilateral consumption decisions.
Second, the fiscal situation needs to be carefully assessed. The blogger said that she is a stay-at-home mother, spending 20,000 yuan in two months, plus renovation expenses, which seems to imply that the family's finances are not sufficient. But she still buys durian lavishly, without taking into account her husband's opinion, which is really difficult to please the public.
Third, neglect to take care of children. In the video posted by the blogger, the child showed symptoms of fire, but she still let the child eat durian, which is inevitably inconsiderate of the child's physical condition. As a mother, taking care of your children should come first.
Fourth, advocating that public opinion is not properly oriented. The blogger hopes to influence the views of netizens through the video and portray her husband as a negative image of "stingy", which is questionable in itself. Family disputes should not be tied up with public opinion and open discussion.
To sum up, most netizens believe that it is not wrong for the husband to point out the consumption problem of the blogger from a responsible point of view, and the blogger unilaterally provoked a dispute and ignored the family economy and the situation of the children, and his own position seems inappropriate. Private family matters should not be discussed publicly, and I hope that the two can communicate and coordinate again to find a mutually agreed solution.
This "durian gate" incident has sparked widespread discussion on the Internet, from which we can also see that family harmony and the growth of children require joint efforts and understanding from both sides. Both financially and emotionally need to be balanced, and should not be unilateral. I hope that in similar incidents in the future, netizens can think about the problem fairly and objectively from multiple angles, and avoid unilateral sides and disputes.
Loading...