Recently, the famous American media accused India of falsifying economic data, and Indian netizens threw it back with a boomerang: You are the United States who fake!
Aren't the United States and India allies? Is it the US economic data that is fake, or is India fake? Or are they all fakes? Let's see, how do they bite each other?
In today's world, the United States has serious double standards, resulting in their frequent boomerangs, which has become a meme on the Internet. Some people say that Americans contract more than 80% of the jokes of the earthlings, especially the beautiful spokesperson of the White House, and it is a pity not to talk about talk shows.
The story we are telling today is going to make you laugh for a while.
In the past two years, there have been many suspicions about the falsification of US economic data, but recently, some US media have published an article accusing India of falsifying economic data.
A few days ago, the website of Time magazine in the United States published an opinion piece signed by Debash Roy Chaudhry, entitled "The Real Performance of India's Economy under Modi's Rule."
Someone checked that Debash Roy Chaudhry was not a nobody, but a columnist. Those who can become columnists in the United States are not ordinary people, they all have a certain weight.
The article is very well written, the Spring and Autumn penmanship is very sharp, it can be said to be a very heavy article, obviously not a random gangster, but organized and planned.
The article argues that India's actual economic growth has a major deviation from the deepening of the economic growth rate constructed by the Modi government. In fact, India's economic growth since Modi's second term has been the slowest since India opened its market in the 90s.
To enhance the persuasiveness, the article gives two examples.
In the first example, the article says that during Modi's 10-year term, India's per capita income increased only half of that of the Singh government. So where does the Modi government say that the economy is growing rapidly, but the Indian people are not making money?
This example doesn't say that it might be easy to grow from 100 to 1,000, and 10,000 to 10,000 is a 10-fold increase, which is too difficult.
In the second example, the International Monetary Fund expects India's economy to grow by only 6.5% in 2023, while Indian officials blatantly lie that they expect growth of more than 8%.
This example also doesn't say that between 6.5% and 8%, there is only a difference of 1.5%, which is labeled as "blatant lying"?
We don't know if India's economic data has been falsified, let alone defend India, but we just want to say that the logic of the article is too far-fetched.
In addition, the article stresses that India's so-called national prosperity is in fact an illusion, and in fact, of India's 1.4 billion people, the upper 1 million people control 80% of India's wealth, and the remaining 1.4 billion people share 20%.
With the combat power of Indian netizens, this article was of course sprayed to the fullest. India's boomerang is no worse than our Made in China.
Indians point out that the falsification of US economic data is the most outrageous on the planet, while Americans often engage in "annualized growth rates" that no one on earth can understand to whitewash the peace.
Often, the real economic growth rate of the United States is less than 2%, and in an annualized way, it becomes 4%, which is simply off the mark.
In addition, the gap between rich and poor in the United States is much worse than in India, with 1% of the rich in the United States owning more than 80% of the wealth, and the remaining 99% of Americans sharing less than 20%.
The falsification of U.S. economic data is a blatant thing, especially since the Department of Labor is simply a shame for the United States.
They release high non-farm payrolls every month, and then quietly revise them two months later, each time by tens of thousands, and the total number of downward adjustments for the whole year is as high as a million.
This is blatant falsification, otherwise why don't you increase it when the non-farm payrolls are corrected? Why is the error statistically high every time and must be lowered?
It's all just a joke, nothing strange. The key question is that the United States has always been India, how did it reverse this year?
The answer is two things, the first is the US election, and the second is the Indian election.
In the U.S. election, the Biden administration has to brag about itself first, India can't have an economic miracle, and of course China can't have it, and the miracle has to be the United States.
In India's general election, Modi promised to develop the economy first, and the wind direction has completely changed, and the Americans have found that India is going to get out of control if it goes on like this.
The Americans have always been good at hitting first and then pulling, and their gift to other countries is that we can stop hitting you.
Singing about the Indian economy is a knock on India and Modi, and then the United States will tell the Indians to submit to the United States, on the condition that we can stop beating you.
Doesn't this plot sound familiar? That's what they've always done to us.
After the end of World War II, the Americans helped some countries in Europe and East Asia rebuild, and at the same time exported technology and capital to help them develop their economies, winning decades of respect and hegemony.
When power frequently becomes a bargaining chip at the negotiating table, no one in the world trusts the United States anymore, and they are not far from death.