I don't have a penny, how to open a hotel, today we are going to talk about the story of a Jewish businessman, you have to understand his entrepreneurial story, you don't have money, you can also start your entrepreneurial road, when he was poor and white, he fell in love with a piece of commercial land worth 500 million, at this time he wanted to buy this land and build a hotel.
So what is the total investment of this hotel? In fact, if he goes to get the land, 300 million can be done, and 200 million can be done by building a hotel and completing the decoration, so the total investment at this time is still 500 million, and the hotel can be repaid in 5 years after it opens.
Although this is a very good project, he is poor and white, where did he get 500 million to do this? At this time, he found an investor and proposed that the two of them set up a project company to run the hotel.
So the investor takes 500 million out, he doesn't have a penny, how to divide this shareholding ratio, according to our traditional investment logic, who has more money, who takes more shares, then the investor alone out of 500 million, he can't get a penny, so he doesn't have any shares?
According to such an investment logic, this Jewish businessman must not do it, so what is the shareholding ratio he wants? Investors take 500 million yuan out and don't care about anything, so investors can only take 49% of the shares.
As for him, although he didn't take a penny, he was responsible for building the hotel, and then he was also responsible for the operation and management of the hotel, so he wanted to take 51% of the shares, so according to this shareholding ratio, should the investor refuse at this time.
The two of them contribute money and efforts, and both want to become major shareholders, so how to reconcile this contradiction? In fact, at this time, for investors, who is the major shareholder may not be what he cares about the most, so what does he care about the most? What he cares about is when he will be able to get his 500 million back, how to prove that he can definitely get it back, and how much money he can make after getting it back.
Is it possible that as long as these three problems are solved, their cooperation can be reached, so how did this Jewish businessman solve it? He told the investor that although I have 51% of the equity, I can pledge my equity to you, and the right to income and voting rights are yours, which means that the company is still 100% controlled by you.
Then we put this land in the company's assets, I use 300 million to get 500 million land for you, here I will earn you 200 million, if the capital is returned after 5 years, our pledge will be released, dividends and voting rights are distributed according to the proportion of shareholdings, in addition to the company pays you 10% interest, you are completely risk-free.
How about it, is the distribution of this Jewish businessman reasonable, if you are an investor, you don't have to do anything, after 5 years, not only can you return the capital, but also have 50 million interest, do you want to invest in this project, of course, it turns out that the investor's choice is right, and then after the Jewish businessman opened the hotel, he will recover the investment cost to the investor in 5 years.
So what has this Jewish businessman gotten in recent years? After the pledged equity was released, he got 51% of the equity of the project, and earned 500 million in 5 years, and this 51% can earn more than 50 million for this Jewish businessman every year.
After he has the funds, can he invest in more industries, why do rich people only get richer and richer, it is because they can make all kinds of investments, and then their assets are like snowballing, rolling bigger and bigger