Hello dear readers! I'm Ah Ling, and the topic I bring to you today is: Women have the ability to reproduce, but the status of women is low in history until now, what do you think?
The following is shared by many netizens, let's take a look!
Cultural people just don't speak the same
In fact, status is not determined by procreation, but by the value of labor.
Up to now, peasants do not have much income in a year, and the price of growing grain cannot rise, and the state stipulates that even if a peasant grows grain for a lifetime, he may not be able to afford a house
Not only is it not the main force, but in most cases it is an asset to compete for
Lions, monkeys, wolves, and wolves are all the same, and males only enjoy the leader, and the others wander
Matriarchal society is just a hypothesis, and it is not yet a reality recognized by the academic community, but a hypothesis and inference with a relatively high degree of acceptance
For the sake of work, don't get married, because if you are married and have no children, there is no company to ask for it, and even if you give birth, you will be suspected if you don't have a boy in the family and don't have enough children
Sounds a bit like a new generation of a lion. Iron lions, flowing lions.
Rome went through it, and then even the barbarians couldn't beat it
The second brother of Africa is also a large female and a low status of the male
Thank you for reading, and what do you think about that?
Everyone is welcome to share in the comment area, don't forget to like and follow~ See you in our comment area!
The material comes from the Internet, invaded and deleted