Before discussing the bold proposal to abolish the teaching staff of public primary and secondary schools, let's take a look at a little history lesson. I remember that at that time, the teacher establishment was like a golden job in the education world, and everyone was envious. However, as time went on, cracks began to appear in this rice bowl.
Loading...
Recruitment turmoil in Xiang'an District, Xiamen City
I remember that spring, Xiang'an District of Xiamen City decided to recruit a group of backbone teachers, the conditions are superior, the treatment is generous, it is simply eye-catching. They promised that these lucky people would enjoy the same benefits as the staff of public institutions. However, who would have thought that this job fair would end with the cancellation and reduction of jobs.
Why? It turned out that the ratio of the number of applicants to the position did not reach the expected 3:1. This makes people wonder, is the job not attractive enough, or is there no enthusiasm for the teaching profession?
Loading...
The need for reform in the management of teacher staffing
In recent years, with the acceleration of urbanization and the adjustment of fertility policies, our schools are facing unprecedented challenges. The shortage of teachers is a thorny problem.
We always seem to be torn between "no staff available" and "overstaffed", which makes the allocation of educational resources extremely difficult. This mismatch between supply and demand is undoubtedly a major driving force for the reform of teacher establishment management.
Loading...
Risks and challenges of preparation reform
However, reform always comes with risks. Eliminating staffing and implementing contracts may sound like a good solution, but does it really guarantee the stability of the teaching workforce?
We can't help but wonder if this will put the legal identity and management of teachers in an awkward situation of "dual tracks". More importantly, will this reform exacerbate the shortage of good teachers in public schools by causing those who are good teachers to move to private schools?
Innovation and exploration
Faced with such challenges, the researchers have put forward a series of innovative suggestions. For example, we should build a multi-dimensional and flexible establishment and approval standard, innovate the management system for tapping potential and revitalizing the establishment, and improve the cross-level and cross-regional establishment and circulation mechanism. They even put forward the bold idea of establishing a "dual-track" system for teachers in and out of staff in public primary and secondary schools and implementing equal pay for equal work. These proposals sound very forward-looking, but it will take time to see if they can be implemented.
Who will carry the banner of establishment reform?
In this discussion on whether to abolish the establishment of teachers in public primary and secondary schools, we have seen a variety of opinions and suggestions. Some fear that this will lead to an inequitable distribution of educational resources, while others believe that this is the only way to go through education reform. Either way, we cannot ignore the fact that education is a major issue concerning the future of the country, and no reform should be hasty.
In this discussion, we can't help but ask, who will carry this banner? Is it the education sector, or is it each and every one of us? On this controversial topic, we are more hopeful that we will be able to put aside our prejudices and discuss together to find the most suitable path for our country's education reform.
Now, it's your turn, dear netizens. What do you think of the proposal to abolish the teaching establishment of public primary and secondary schools? How do you think this will affect our education? Come and share your thoughts in the comment area, and let's participate in this big discussion about the future of education!