In the CBA game, the referee's blowing penalty seems to be more and more puzzling, is the home advantage of the Liaoning team really so obvious? Or is the referee's standard biased? All kinds of signs seem to indicate that some players or teams seem to have "special treatment" in front of the referee.
In the fierce battle of the playoffs semifinals, Guangdong defeated Liaoning 110-94, and there were some controversial episodes in this game. In the third quarter of the game, Xu Jie of the Guangdong team yelled at Zhang Zhenlin after scoring a point, but was whistled by the referee for a technical foul. The decision raised a number of questions.
It is worth mentioning that in the previous game, Zhang Zhenlin of the Liaoning team was also accused of receiving "special care" from the referee. Such a decision raises questions about whether referees have different standards for different players.
For such a situation, I personally believe that the CBA's referee team should explain the blowing penalty so that fans have a clearer understanding of the outcome of the game and avoid leaving unnecessary doubts.
Finally, let's take a look at the statistics of the game, Xu Jie of the Guangdong team became the highest scorer in the team with a high score of 26 points. The Liaoning team relied on the efforts of players such as Zhao Jiwei to try to compete with their opponents. Is the result of such a victory or defeat determined by the referee's blowing penalty or the performance of the players?