laitimes

If reasoning is not enough, then cheating is a shortcut

author:Yuan Dadao
If reasoning is not enough, then cheating is a shortcut

Every day on this bizarre social stage, we switch between different roles and try to solve problems in the most decent way possible.

But have you ever felt that the word "truth" is like a well-packaged luxury, seemingly high-end atmosphere, but in fact, in the vegetable market of life, you can't even exchange a cabbage?

Imagine being squeezed into a piece of paper on the subway, ready to get off, and you try to get a little breathing space with a "please give way", only to be ignored as if you were talking to the wind.

At this time, do you suddenly feel that some things are starting to become "unbearable and no longer tolerable"?

Reasoning at this time is indeed "difficult to move an inch".

It has to be said that nowadays reasoning has become a high-cost and low-return investment.

You are correct and round, logical and rigorous, thinking that you can convince the world, but unexpectedly, the sentence "I don't care, I want it" on the other side instantly made your thousand words come to naught.

As a result, the word "cheating", which is restrained by moral labels,

At some moments, there was a seductive light.

If reasoning is not enough, then cheating is a shortcut

Nowadays, reasoning is no longer the only way to solve problems.

For example, if you buy a dress online, you find that it is a tragic contrast between the "buyer's show" and the "seller's show".

At this time, you call customer service, and the other party's word "pro" starts with a polite word, but it is actually a fake politeness that rejects you thousands of miles away.

At this time, if you gently ask for a return, what you get is often a templated prevarication, and even worse, you will be moved out of a whole set of things with unclear logic and unclear meaning.

In exchange for your reasoning, they are unreasonable.

But if you change the norm and come to a "live broadcast and unbox if you don't solve it", or simply throw out a sentence, the big deal will be solved upward.

Next is the moment to witness the miracle, you will find that the other party will really talk well and will really solve your problems seriously,

When you think he's still "with the mud",

Suddenly he's enlightened, suddenly he's got his hands on how to respect you, and suddenly he's got to know what he's supposed to do as a customer service.

Suddenly, the problem was solved.

This is not a miracle, and it is definitely not a "dying feeling", in the final analysis, it is the other party who realizes that

You have a threat, so he must deal with your threat, even if your threat is reasonable and in line with the consumer's reasonable demands.

If there is no threat, you will fool things, and when there is a threat, you will know how to "be a good person".

It's sad, it's sad, it's ridiculous.

If reasoning is not enough, then cheating is a shortcut

In this era, "crying children have milk to eat" is no longer synonymous with vexatiousness, but a kind of survival wisdom.

Of course, we are not advocating vexatiousness, but when reasonable demands are not answered, it seems to be a helpless but effective way to communicate.

The truth is sometimes so absurd and true, and this phenomenon actually reflects the lack of social trust and the imbalance of communication mechanisms.

People are beginning to believe that the "extraordinary means" that directly address the pain points of solving problems,

Far more direct and effective than a step-by-step principle:

A person of normal mind will not regard those extraordinary means as routine operations.

But the cruelty of reality lies in the fact that

If reasoning can't solve the problem,

Then the problem will be "solved" by the reasonable person.