Hello dear friends, I have come to share with you again wonderful topics,
Please move your little hands to pay attention and like! Give some support ~Thank you~
On April 26, on the Yuncheng Expressway in Shanxi, a Huawei Wenjie M7 rear-end fire incident has been continuously searched on the Internet, and the four major doubts in the accident have become the focus of public opinion.
Question 1: Why does the AEB emergency braking not respond?
The vehicle involved in the accident is the 5-seater rear-wheel drive version of the 2024 Wenjie M7 Plus, which is not equipped with Huawei's advanced intelligent driver assistance system (Huawei ADS), so it does not support omnidirectional active safety functions. So, does this mean that the AEB system is useless at high speeds, and should we put forward higher requirements for the working range of the AEB system?
The M5 can reach 120KM
Doubt 2: Ask the M7 Plus version of whose intelligent driving solution?
There is some controversy about the intelligent driving scheme of the M7 Plus version. According to the search results, the official said that the Bosch solution was used, but Bosch quickly issued a denial of this, stating that the vehicle involved was not equipped with the Bosch intelligent driving system (including AEB). On the other hand, according to industry insiders, there are two suppliers of the intelligent driving technology of the M7 Plus, one is Bosch and the other is FreeTech. This suggests that the M7 Plus may have adopted an AB supply strategy, where the same component is supplied by two different suppliers, which is sometimes used in the industry as a strategy to reduce costs and risks. However, there is no official clear statement on which vendor's intelligent driving system will be installed, and further official information or survey results are needed to confirm.
Doctor's Statement
Question 3: Why is the collision not automatically unlocked?
Although the M7 owner's manual clearly states that the vehicle will automatically unlock after a collision, after the accident, the rescuers could not open the car door and could only smash the window to save people. AITO's customer service responded that most of the vehicles do not have an automatic unlocking function, and in this accident, the driver and passenger have lost consciousness and cannot open the door from the inside of the car. So, does this mean that the vehicle manufacturer is negligent in its safety design?
Screenshot of the owner's manual
Man smashed the window of the car to rescue
Question 4: Does the hidden doorknob hinder rescue?
Concealed door handles are of concern in accidents, as external rescue must break windows if they fail to unlock automatically. There are currently no regulations explicitly prohibiting hidden door handles, but it is recommended to increase the publicity of hidden door handles so that the public can understand how to open doors and rescue. So, does this mean that we ignore the importance of safety while pursuing the beauty of the vehicle?
For this incident: netizens are also hotly discussed:
Concealed doorknobs are a real problem
Ten seconds is really enough time, and if there is a collision, even if people are not injured, 10 seconds is not enough to react.
I think that whether it is a tram or a petrol car, the risk factor of collision over 100 yards is very high.
I drive a Tesla, I never use AP to assist driving, and I don't give the initiative to the computer.
That's right!
We expect a more detailed response from the official response to the M7 rear-end collision and fire, and take corresponding measures to improve the safety of the vehicle. At the same time, we should also learn from this experience and raise awareness and awareness of vehicle safety. #头条创作挑战赛 ##山西##运城问界M7起火致3人遇难, car companies responded#
What do you think about this matter? Welcome to comment in the comment area!