The houses and yards in rural areas and the land occupied by them are homesteads belonging to village collectives, which are currently occupied by peasant households in accordance with the law, and enjoy the right to use collective land, and are land privately occupied by peasant households, which is protected by laws and regulations.
It is up to the peasants themselves to place vehicles, agricultural machinery, grain, sundries, etc., in the yards of their homes, and others have no right to interfere.
Therefore, it is the legitimate rights and interests of farmers to park their own cars in the yard of their homes, or to agree to allow others to park their vehicles, and the interference of others is a tortious act and an illegal act.
According to media reports on May 14, in the suburbs of Shanghai, some places have set up a kind of "closed" intelligent parking charging facilities, which are also called "serving the masses", to facilitate villagers and migrant workers to park and ensure parking safety.
But this way of smart parking charging service, for all the villagers in the village, no matter how you look at it, it still feels very wrong, why is this? What is it like?
According to media reports, farmers and migrant workers in the rural area have to pay the parking fee out of their pockets when they drive their cars home and park them in the yard of their homes. Or is it an important area where cars have to pay a fee when they pass by? What kind of truth is this? What does the law say?
The addition of intelligent parking charging facilities in the village are the introduction of the property company in the residential area of Shanghai to manage the model, the charging work is all handed over to the property company to implement the specific implementation, the car charges 150 yuan per month for parking, and the car is higher, you have to charge 800 yuan a month for parking, which is home! It's like entering a toll booth.
How can we treat and manage the rural areas as residential communities in Shanghai, and how can the homesteads of peasant households be the private land used by the peasant collectives for the peasants, while the land that is not an urban community is state-owned land, and they are completely different types of land of different natures, and how can they be compared?
Let's talk about it, what kind of service is this, using the villagers as ATMs in the bank? Do you use the front of a farmer's house as a toll booth on the highway? What kind of service does this provide to the villagers? Let the farmer pay the fee, understand which service fee?
As a result, some farmers and migrant workers, unable to afford to park their vehicles and resentful of the introduction of property management in rural areas, have parked their vehicles in small woods or beside small roads outside their villages.
There are also some migrant workers who, in order to save parking costs, move to remote places at the junction of urban and rural areas, far away from the villages, so that they do not have to pay parking fees.
In the rural areas of some areas of Shanghai, is this practice unreasonable and illegal? Is it a charge in accordance with the law, or is it a charge in violation of laws and regulations? Is it a lack of civility? Or is it such an unruly behavior?
These farmers who have been charged believe that they have to pay fees for parking their vehicles in their legal rural yards, and this kind of charging has reached the point that it is too outrageous, and their behavior of charging fees is legal? Is it illegal?
These peasants who were charged appealed to the relevant departments at the higher level to come out and explain, whether this kind of charge is reasonable. Is it legal? Is it illegal or not? Should this charging be abolished?
What do you think about the practice of villagers parking in their own yards and paying parking fees in the rural areas of Shanghai, please exchange and discuss in the message area.