laitimes

The United States "punches" and SWIFT excludes the Bank of China?

author:A cat walks the world
The United States "punches" and SWIFT excludes the Bank of China?

With the news that the US government plans to remove China's state-owned banks from the SWIFT payment system, there has been an uproar inside and outside the financial circle. This strategic decision is a double-edged sword, with both devastating negative effects and positive potential for systemic reform.

The United States "punches" and SWIFT excludes the Bank of China?

Rumors of a "big move" by the US government?

This big move by the US government is still in the rumor stage. Imagine that the world's largest payment and settlement system would lose the participation of China, the world's second-largest economy, and its global reach and influence would be greatly reduced, and China could face serious challenges to its financial system as a result.

The United States "punches" and SWIFT excludes the Bank of China?

If implemented, the global financial structure will change significantly, and the competitive landscape will be reshuffled as a result. If a similar financial pipeline were to be severed, the impact on the international financial system and the world economy would be far-reaching. We cannot underestimate the potential risks that such a move can bring.

It's more like a financial war without gunpowder.

Potential opportunities for Chinese banks and foreign banks

Against the backdrop of restrictions on state-owned banks, a new world has opened up for private banks and foreign banks. They have greater flexibility and innovation, and have obvious advantages in providing cross-border payment services and customized financial solutions.

The United States "punches" and SWIFT excludes the Bank of China?

The redistribution of market share presents a huge opportunity for these banks, with the potential to lead the financial markets into a new landscape. This allows private banks to strengthen international cooperation and expand their business areas, while foreign banks have the opportunity to further expand their influence in the Chinese market, and may even influence the innovation of financial products and services.

The United States "punches" and SWIFT excludes the Bank of China?

Reshaping and challenging the system

It turns out that baptism and challenge are often the opposite-driving forces. In the midst of changes in the international financial market, China's financial system may be able to find an opportunity to reshape and renew.

As far as China is concerned, it is possible to further strengthen financial supervision and raise awareness of risk prevention, and externally, it may push China to accelerate the opening up of its financial market and seek more international cooperation. It is foreseeable that China's financial market may present a more diversified picture in the future, in other words, "crisis is a turning point", and this challenge may become an opportunity for the transformation and upgrading of China's financial system.

The intentions and potential risks of this move by the United States

The deeper purpose of the US government's move is multifaceted and complex, on the one hand, it may be aimed at limiting China's support for other international "pawns", such as Russia, and on the other hand, it can be seen as a means of strengthening its own financial sanctions.

The United States "punches" and SWIFT excludes the Bank of China?

In the long run, this could lead to a loss of stability in the global financial system, with the opposite effect not negligible. If the international community loses confidence in the actions of the United States, the hegemony of the dollar may be shaken, and the global economic order may be restructured.

The Rise and Global Impact of the CIPS Payment System

CIPS Payment System, also known as China International Payment System, is a global clearing service system independently developed by China. Its biggest advantage is that it meets the needs of cross-border RMB payments in China and around the world, reducing the cost and risk of international transactions.

The United States "punches" and SWIFT excludes the Bank of China?

In the face of the pressure of "decoupling" in the United States, the role of the CIPS payment system may be enhanced. It could be a solution to the payment problems that state-owned banks may face, and even promote the rapid development of cross-border RMB business. It is not just China that is bullish on the possibility of CIPS, but players around the world may also take the opportunity to engage in deeper financial cooperation with China.

A financial game where the winner is unpredictable

In this cross-border financial game, state-owned banks may have to face a dilemma for a while, while private and foreign banks are trying to take advantage of the situation and seize new opportunities in the market, potential alternatives such as CIPS payment systems are in the spotlight and are expected to improve their status, and global investors and partners are weighing risks and opportunities and adjusting their strategic layout.

The United States "punches" and SWIFT excludes the Bank of China?

But who will emerge victorious in this game is still uncertain. Every turbulence in the market implies a change in the future pattern, and the passage of time will verify whether each prediction is correct or not, just like a chessboard without regrets, every step affects the final trend.

Turning Point and Prospect in Crisis

The current financial challenges could also be an opportunity for China's financial system to reinvent itself. As a result of this campaign, the awareness of risks from all walks of life will become more mature, the supervision will be more refined, and the resilience of financial institutions will be unprecedentedly strengthened.

It is hoped that while facing challenges, China's financial system can take this opportunity to deepen reform, improve the level of opening-up, promote the development of better financial services, and ultimately achieve a dynamic balance and sustainable development in both domestic and international situations.

Read on