We are in a network society, and the information we receive is extremely developed and abundant. There are also a lot of lies mixed in it, Yilin, and the reader is the representative. Today, there are many voices on the Internet, hyping up the need to bring down e-commerce and eliminate e-commerce, on the grounds of restoring the development of the real economy, increasing the employment of ordinary people, and narrowing the gap between the rich and the poor. Listen to his words, watch his deeds, eliminate e-commerce and restore the real economy, just like the lies woven by Argentine President Milley.
Ordinary people have experienced the era of physical stores, I would like to ask what is everyone's impression of physical stores? or what words are used to summarize physical stores? expensive, poor service experience, depending on the price of people. Expensive, everyone understands, this point is indisputable, capitalists are all after profits, no one will be a philanthropist. E-commerce is also making money, and physical stores are also making money, and e-commerce is more like distributing the money of landlords and physical store owners to the general public, just like the original local tyrants and dividing the land, but the e-commerce takes the big head and the people take the small head.
From the perspective of the people, if you vote with your feet, you know that you support e-commerce, landlords and brick-and-mortar store owners do not represent the people, so why do the people have to spend high prices to shop in brick-and-mortar stores to support landlords and brick-and-mortar store owners?
Theories like this that force the masses to go to physical stores to support landlords and brick-and-mortar store owners, I scoff at them and don't make sense. Is it reasonable for the British people to pay taxes and spend money to support the queen's aristocratic family? I don't want to, I have to pay tribute to physical stores with my hard-earned money, in the name of restoring the real economy. This kind of brainwashing PUA is also high-sounding.
At every turn, move out of the unemployment theory to oppress people, and there are only three kinds of jobs that physical stores bring to the people, waiters, waiters, or waiters. Everyone knows the salary of the waiter, let the people receive a salary of 3,000 a month to go to the physical store to consume, support the landlord and the physical store owner, how do you think of it, and say it?
On the other hand, the jobs brought by e-commerce to ordinary people, couriers are five or six thousand a month, is this what waiters can compare? Higher wages, lower commodity prices, better service experience, e-commerce and physical stores, how do you choose for ordinary people?
I am more supportive of e-commerce, after the problem is exposed, the e-commerce can refund, but you go to the physical restaurant, will people give you a refund? The restaurant is almost a physical store, do you see that they do better than the e-commerce? Do they have better product quality? This is all known to everyone, I have not eaten the meat bun of the breakfast restaurant for many years.
It seems that a lot of things have been said, but in fact nothing has been said, I would like to ask what the backward areas used to rely on to make money? If they go out to work, then e-commerce has no impact on them, but with e-commerce, they can choose to work as couriers at home. If they are farming at home, then the impact of e-commerce on them is beneficial, e-commerce gives them a second way to sell their agricultural products, and they are no longer exploited by second-hand dealers, and can sell directly on e-commerce platforms. The people grow vegetables, the couriers transport the vegetables, the consumers buy the vegetables, and the entire industrial chain is the people, so how can it be siphoned? E-commerce can siphon, which can only mean that the physical store is too weak and weak, and there is no competitiveness at all.
If there is no e-commerce, the real economy will prosper, and Africa will long ago surpass the United States and become the world's largest GDP. The products sold by e-commerce are all produced from factories, so e-commerce itself is the real economy.
Don't talk about e-commerce, when physical stores were popular, many factories also closed down, why didn't you spray physical stores? Could it be that Nokia's decline is also the pot of e-commerce? During the new crown epidemic, the sales of every car manufacturer were declining, but BYD grew against the trend, because the strong never complained about the environment. Today, the sales of fuel vehicles have been declining, is it to blame e-commerce? When the era eliminates you, you won't even say hello.
In terms of employment, e-commerce abuses physical stores, in addition to waiters, what other jobs can you provide to ordinary people?
From the perspective of the real economy, physical stores sell products, e-commerce also sells products, everyone buys goods from factories, they are all second-class dealers, what grandson do you pretend?
From the perspective of the common people, the jobs remain the same, the wages are higher than those of waiters, the price of products has become lower, the choice is wider, and the return service attitude is good, I feel that there is no need to argue anymore.