The confrontation between Iran and Israel is still continuing, firing weapons and missiles worth 1.3 billion yuan in one night, so that if the confrontation continues for a few more nights, will Israel go bankrupt? If we follow the analogy of such a war situation, will China, as the defending side, have a more cost-effective way?
In recent days, Iran has launched at least more than 200 missiles of various kinds against Israel, as well as nearly 200 suicide drones.
The value of these weapons is directly as high as 62 million US dollars, and the terrifying advanced combat power is carried out in the way of burning money, which has led the international community to discuss this.
Iran's drone suicide attack, Israel has a relatively good defense capability of the "Iron Dome" and standard air defense system to guard, the launch of attack shells cost tens of thousands of dollars, because the interception and counteroffensive accuracy of this air defense system is limited, resulting in a lot of fired shells caused a waste, when attacked, the defense of the launched shells will naturally be stronger than the intensity of the opponent's attack.
The total number of shells fired by Israel has reached at least three times that of Iran, not counting the shells fired by the more expensive "Arrow-3" air defense system, the price of each shell is as high as several million dollars, and there are a large number of missiles and warplanes against Iran, just this night's fierce confrontation has caused Israel to consume up to 1 billion or more costs, and some Western media said that this night's battle cost Iran and Israel a total of 1.3 billion US dollars, which is converted into more than 9 billion yuan.
Such a terrible amount of money surprised many countries that were waiting and watching, it seems that modern wars are really unaffordable, and ordinary countries do not dare to use weapons, which is simply burning money.
Israel is forced to fight back fiercely against Iran, but Israel cannot afford such a fight. Of course, the United States will not provide arms aid out of thin air, and naturally there are secret prices and conditions for any so-called allies who support it?
Israel's annual military expenditure is only more than $20 billion, and nearly one-tenth of its military spending was spent on this day, which is also terrible. No wonder netizens said that if they continue to fight on this scale, Israel will go bankrupt in a few nights, and they really can't afford to fight such an expensive war.
As a result, there is a topic of discussion on the Internet, saying that if the defending country is replaced by China, can there be a more cost-effective way to ensure the intensity of countermeasures?
This topic has also quickly aroused heated discussions and attention, because from a comparative point of view, Israel cannot be compared with China, let alone has China's comprehensive strength and advantages.
China's military production capacity is one of the most efficient in the world, and Israel cannot compare with it. In addition, the development of Israel's military industry mainly relies on the support of the United States, as well as the weapons and equipment that have been eliminated by the United States, and so on, which are not highly advanced, and the channels for increasing supplies are limited.
The level of the military industry of Israel and China is not at the same level at all, cannot be compared with China, and is not comparable.
So hypothetically, when China encounters a situation that needs to be defended, how can it maintain its counter-firepower, and be able to fully adjust according to the battle situation, so that if it wants to destroy the intensity, it will have intensive firepower, and if it needs a protracted counteroffensive, it will be able to supply a large amount of consumption?
First of all, the mainland's defensive strength is very strong, and its radar early warning capability is a world-class level; once any suspicious situation occurs, the mainland's radar can give early warning and report to the combat command center, take defensive measures in a timely manner, and will not let the enemy's attacks be in place, and only then will they be able to counterattack in hindsight.
In addition, the mainland has a vast territory and very good conditions for strategic depth, and it has room for maneuver and maneuver, while the Israeli side only has a position of more than 20,000 square kilometers and has nowhere to move and take refuge, and the distance between the military position and ordinary people's houses is too close, and it is inevitable that it will be disturbed and affected.
China has a strong combat readiness incremental production capacity, which has been verified by years of practice, and then the mainland's military industry has developed a variety of advanced equipment, all of which are localized, with the advantage of low-cost large-scale mass production, whether it is rocket artillery or artillery, as well as carrier-based fighters, etc., can achieve more active and active increase in order procurement.
Not only that, China also has hundreds of thousands of machinery factories that can change from civilian to military to military production in extraordinary times, such as chemical agent factories that can produce chemical explosives and grenades, and some automobile and machinery factories that can produce armored and infantry vehicles, etc., so the mainland's backup capacity in wartime is very terrible, and 24-hour overtime production is enough to supply the strategic deployment needs of the front line.
This can be seen from the fact that China has more than one million drones registered at every turn, and it can be seen that China's future defense strength and the strong intensity of countering the enemy are difficult for other countries to match, and perhaps the enemy will regret it under such a powerful offensive, underestimating China's defensive capabilities, and eventually causing the enemy to flee in a crushing defeat.