### Chapter 1: Shocking news from social media
In early April, when spring was getting stronger, a video on social platforms such as Weibo and Douyin attracted widespread attention. A man named "Da Yao Tok" recounted his ordeal in a slightly angry tone in the video. It turned out that just five days after the man bought the Xiaomi SU7 founding version of the car, that is, on an afternoon of April 9, he was suddenly forcibly fired by the company for violating the non-compete rules, and no financial compensation of any kind was given. The most surprising thing is that the whole process from accepting the appointment from HR to receiving the resignation notice took only an hour.
In his narrative, "Da Yao Tok" also revealed a detail: when he was questioned by HR, he also deliberately turned on the recording function in an attempt to preserve evidence. There was a hint of cunning in his words, as if he intended to guide public opinion that the reason why he was fired was because he bought a competitor's product - Xiaomi car.
The incident quickly caused an uproar on the Internet. After all, Xiaomi, as one of the hottest brand cars at the moment, its influence should not be underestimated. The man's personal experience has become a hot topic of conversation after dinner, and for a while, the discussion about workplace justice and corporate rules and regulations has become a hot topic on social media.
### Chapter 2: Legal Statements and Public Opinion Turmoil
As the topic continued to rise, a week later, on April 17, Jiyue Automobile Company, which was at the center of the whirlpool of public opinion, finally responded. The company's legal department issued a well-worded statement to clarify the suspicions and rumors on the Internet.
The statement mentioned that the company's decision to fire "Da Yao Tok" was not because he bought a Xiaomi car, but because he used his position in the company's media operations to frequently post promotional content related to the Xiaomi brand on his personal social media account. This practice not only violates professional ethics, but also damages the company's image and reputation. The statement from the Ministry of Justice also stressed that the company's decisions were reasonable, compliant and lawful.
To further prove its position, Jiyue Auto also released photos of its employees' parking lots, which clearly show various brands of cars, proving that the company does not require employees to buy their own brand vehicles.
However, this statement did not completely quell the public craze. Instead, it has made new waves, and many people have begun to question whether "Da Yao Tok's" true motives and professional ethics are really problematic.
### Chapter 3: The truth and doubts exposed are numerous
As the events continue to ferment, more details and evidence begin to surface. An insider with the online name "Dachang Youth Pro" came forward to break the news, saying that the company has never required employees to buy their own brand of vehicles, and the so-called dismissal of "Da Yao Tok" for buying a car is completely one-sided.
The anonymous insider went on to reveal that, in fact, "Da Yao Tok" is often busy managing his personal self-media account during working hours, and almost all of the content he publishes is related to Xiaomi. These behaviors seriously distracted him from his work, and he even appeared absent from work without reason on many occasions.
In addition, the insider also pointed out that "Da Yao Tok" once boasted on social platforms that he participated in the handover ceremony of Xiaomi cars and was personally received by Xiaomi's senior management, which undoubtedly confirmed his behavior of promoting competing products during working hours.
As soon as this information was announced, it immediately sparked heated discussions among netizens. Some people began to question the professionalism of "Da Yao Tok", while others expressed doubts about his integrity. The whole incident gradually evolved into a social debate around professional ethics and online integrity.
### Chapter 4: The Witness of Time and the Restoration of Facts
Attentive netizens did not stop there, they began to dig deep into the past dynamics of "Da Yao Tok" on social platforms, trying to find more clues to restore the truth of the whole incident. Sure enough, while flipping through his historical posts, netizens found a key piece of information.
On April 3rd, a seemingly ordinary working day, "Da Yao Tok" released an exciting dynamic recording his participation in the grand delivery ceremony of the Xiaomi SU7 founding version held in Yizhuang, Beijing. What's even more intriguing is that he mentioned that Mr. Lei, the senior leader of Xiaomi, personally opened the door for him, which made him feel extremely honored and proud.
This description makes one wonder: "Da Yao Tok" is extremely proud of participating in competing activities during working hours, but how loyal he is to the company he works for, and does this behavior mean that he has long forgotten his duties and ethics as a media operator?
Subsequently, more videos and dynamics were dug up, all of which point to an indisputable fact: "Da Yao Tok" does frequently use working hours to do personal business that has nothing to do with the company during his work hours, and these contents are almost all related to the Xiaomi brand.
Such a discovery gradually made the originally confusing events clearer. The public began to understand the position and decision of Jiyue Automobile Company to dismiss the employee, and gradually agreed that the company's handling of "Da Yao Tok" was both reasonable and lawful.
### Chapter 5: Examination of Public Opinion and Individual Reflection
As the facts are revealed, public opinion has gradually formed an overwhelming situation. More and more people are beginning to take the side of Jiyue Automobile Company, believing that what "Da Yao Tok" has done has seriously exceeded the normal range. His personal behavior not only harmed the interests of the company, but also undermined the basic ethics and rules of the workplace.
The voice on the Internet became more sharp and direct, and some netizens commented: "If a person smashes the pot while eating, then he is not worthy of sitting at this table at all." Some people even bluntly said: "If I were the boss, I would not hesitate to fire such an employee." ”
Despite all the accusations and criticism, "Da Yao Tok" seems to be trying to defend himself, claiming that he doesn't know why he was fired from the company. However, such an attitude pales in the face of ironclad facts, and was even reprimanded by netizens as "pretending to be confused".
In this storm of public opinion triggered by "Da Yao Tok", each participant is examining the importance of professional ethics and the influence of personal conduct in their own way. Eventually, "Da Yao Tok" became a negative example, and his story was widely disseminated and became a negative teaching material for after-dinner discussions.
### Chapter 6: The End of the Story and the Transmission of Revelations
With the passage of time, the boiling "Da Yao Tok" incident finally came to an end. Although his image and reputation have been greatly damaged, this incident has left a profound lesson and reflection on the majority of netizens.
As many sane netizens have pointed out, "Da Yao Tok's" behavior is not only disloyal to the company, but also a great irresponsibility to his personal career. His example serves as a cautionary tale to all professionals of the importance of professional ethics and integrity.
For Jiyue Automobile, although this incident is a crisis, it also shows the company's determination and transparency in dealing with the problem. While safeguarding its own legitimate rights and interests, the company has also set an example of standardized management and professional ethics for the entire industry.
In the end, the whole incident ended on a chorus of condemnation, but its impact was long-lasting. It is not only the end of a labor dispute case, but also a practice of social education. Through this case, the public has a deeper understanding of workplace integrity and a clearer understanding of how to balance personal interests with the interests of the company.
This story teaches us that work ethic and integrity are the cornerstones of survival and thrive in the workplace, no matter the circumstances. Without them, even the most glamorous achievements can be wiped out overnight.
Thank you for reading this news article, and we hope to provide you with valuable information and perspectives. If you have any thoughts or opinions about this incident, please leave your comments in the comments section below. We look forward to hearing from you, and we ask that you follow netiquette, speak civilly, and treat others with respect. Thank you for your support and understanding.