It's unbelievable that a man who bought a Xiaomi SU7 returned to the company and fired him for violating the non-compete agreement in the labor contract.
Loading...
This man is the first batch of SU7 owners, at the first batch of delivery ceremony, Lei Jun also personally opened the car door for him, the man looked very excited, even if he tried to restrain himself in the photo, the corners of his mouth were filled with happiness that could not be concealed.
After receiving the company's dismissal information, the man was very depressed and broke the news to a blogger, hoping that the blogger could help him spread the news.
Judging from the chat records, the man said that the unit he worked for was Jiyue, this brand was a little unfamiliar, and there was no such phrase even as the input method, so he had to check the information of this brand on the Internet, and it turned out that this car was a new energy vehicle brand jointly launched by Geely and Baidu.
It is determined that Jiyue and Xiaomi belong to peers, although there is a certain gap in the fame of the two sides, as far as the current situation is concerned, it is difficult to form direct competition at the same level, and it can be regarded as peers. However, Jiyue's employees go to buy Xiaomi cars, this is a violation of the non-compete agreement? That's a bit ridiculous, a lot of employees in Huawei use Apple mobile phones, and I haven't seen anyone Huawei fire all these people who use Apple.
So, let's first understand what is a non-compete agreement?
A non-compete agreement usually refers to a prohibition on employees from simultaneously providing labor services, including part-time employment, to a competitor's company. Judging from the current unilateral announcement of the man named Da Yao Tok, he just likes Xiaomi, bought a Xiaomi car, and took a photo with Mr. Lei, and then posted it on Weibo to show off.
This is generally not included in the non-compete agreement unless they have a special requirement not to purchase or use the competitor's product, or publicly support them.
Judging from the dynamic information released by Da Yao Tok in the past, he is an avid Xiaomi fan, and the first message on his Weibo account was released on March 26, and the key words for his self-introduction on Weibo are: the first batch of SU7 owners, the man who opened the car door by Mr. Lei.
Since its debut, he has been releasing information about Xiaomi cars.
But the text content is not too much, it is more like a casual post, and it has not been carefully prepared in advance.
His Douyin account is also full of videos related to Xiaomi cars, the first video was posted on January 21.
So the question is, did he violate the non-compete agreement?
is also a netizen who is unfamiliar with Jiyue, will Xiaomi really regard it as a competitor?
Some netizens shared an experience of buying a car in Xiaopeng, he once added the clerk's WeChat, but found that the clerk bought a Tesla himself, and also posted photos on Moments.
Some attentive netizens found that many of Xiaomi's staff members use Apple mobile phones, and they have appeared in Xiaomi's promotional videos.
This netizen believes that if you just buy another brand of car privately, it is not a big deal, but after buying, you have to take pictures and hype it, which seems to have a bad impact on your owner.
Some netizens believe that this kind of behavior is a public relations activity, directly standing up for competitors, and being fired is not unjust at all.
Some netizens broke the news that this man not only posted information about Xiaomi on Douyin, Weibo, and Moments, but also the group owner of several WeChat groups, which seemed to imply that he was not a simple Xiaomi fan.
This netizen said more neutrally: At present, it is all this man's one-sided words, has he been fired? Is he really an employee of Jiyue? If so, then whether he has provided paid services for Xiaomi is still unknown.
Someone also broke out this screenshot on the Internet, claiming that the man served as the group owner of the WeChat group and was suspected of building momentum for Xiaomi's publicity.
At present, Jiyue has not made any statement on this matter
A media reporter called Jiyue customer service, and the customer service said that the matter would be reported to the company for verification, but she could not give any clear answer at present.
Finally, what I want to say, don't be in a hurry to stand in line, let's be a quiet melon-eating crowd first, and wait for the statements of the company involved and the parties involved to distinguish between them.