Recently, a video was circulated on the Internet, in which a 70-year-old aunt was dissatisfied with the use of curtains by young people on the train and publicly reprimanded. The incident sparked widespread controversy on the Internet.
Loading...
In the eyes of netizens, there is no problem for young people to use curtains themselves, and there is no basis for aunts to use age to blackmail others to give seats. However, this "curtain door" incident did not end there. Subsequently, the fermentation of the problem became more and more widespread, the opinions of all parties emerged, and the voice of the debate became louder and louder.
1. Aunt questioned and netizens questioned
The controversy caused by this incident immediately stemmed from the aunt's questioning of young people's use of curtains. As one of the direct participants, the aunt believes that young people use curtains to not give up their seats to the elderly, and no doubt she thinks that most of the other passengers will support her in this way. However, it backfired, and when the video was uploaded online, most of the netizens' opinions differed from the aunt's.
Most netizens disagree with the aunt's point of view. They believe that the use of curtains for seats purchased by young people is understandable in itself. Just because the other person is older, you can't force someone else to give up their seat. Moreover, the aunt's public reprimand does not solve the problem, but will cause more controversy. Some netizens pointed out that this is a kind of "moral kidnapping", and the demands imposed on others are indefensible in itself. They believe that the leading role in this incident should be the railway department, not the passengers on either side.
2. Official responses and new questions
In the face of the public opinion effect, the railway department quickly responded, saying that the use of curtains on trains is allowed. This undoubtedly reveals that from the perspective of operating procedures, there is no problem for young people to use curtains.
However, the official response also raises a new question: if the use of curtains is permitted, then the aunt's original accusations seem even more vexatious. Why should she use her age to blackmail others and openly criticize others? This is untenable both legally and morally.
Third, the aunt's original intention and consensus are missing
After analysis, we can believe that the emergence of this controversial incident has a lot to do with the difference between the perception of the aunt herself and the public. The aunt may simply want to express the difficulties of the elderly, and do not anticipate the consequences of her actions. But the toughness and emotion of her expression, as well as her use of her age to blackmail others, are widely considered inappropriate by the public. This also means that in the face of complex social issues, it will be difficult to reach a consensus without the possibility of fully communicating and understanding the demands of different groups.
The "curtain door" incident reproduces the shortcomings of our society in solving the problem of top-level design. It reminds us that we should adopt an attitude of mutual understanding and tolerance, not judge others with a biased eye, and at the same time improve relevant management practices to provide clearer guidance to all parties. Only by reforming the system and making up for differences in ideas can we build a society that is truly harmonious and coexistent.
People should get along with each other on the basis of respect and understanding. Neither party should impose subjective views on others. This controversy may serve us as a reminder that we need to listen more to different voices and be more broad-minded to others, so as to reach a consensus. Only in this way will similar incidents not be repeated and society will function more smoothly.
What do you think about this matter? Welcome to leave a message in the comment area to discuss