A few days ago, I read news about Fujian about the wife's ability to check the property of her spouse, which caused an uproar.
The problem lies in the fact that the woman checks the man, and it can be checked at any time.
The man can't get the woman to check the woman, and he can't get it by asking a lawyer, it's complicated anyway.
Then I saw a picture of this interpretation, I didn't study it in detail, but it looks more outrageous.
This is a very French marriage law, the French stipulates that after the divorce, the man needs to give alimony all the time, directly until the woman remarries, but after the divorce, many women take the ex-husband's money to fall in love, and do not plan to remarry, so it is equivalent to the need to keep 2 people all the time.
The more privileges you have, the less chance you have to get to the table.
Here's my summary of these issues.
When one party has the right to come close to cheating,
Then the other party chooses not to bet with you,
Just don't play anymore.
Let's not talk about marriage law today,
Let's talk about fertility issues,
Friends in Australia,
said that the fertility rate is low,
Only 1.7.
naturally
It's still quite high compared to East Asia
Because South Korea only has 0.72 (2023 data),
Japan 1.3 left and right,
China only has 1.06 in 2022.
So what is Australia's fertility stimulation method?
That is, to give birth to a baby every month,
So a lot of black people are crazy to have babies,
And whites and yellows don't have much urge to have more babies for money,
It's about the same as the yellow race and the white people are raising babies for the blacks
Where does the money come from
Of course, it's the tax of the whole country
For a non-immigrant country like China
Is it okay to just give money?
Surely it will work,
It's just not as active as those black people in Australia who specialize in having babies as a career,
Just look at the speed of blackening in France
All races eventually become black
Back to the mainland
Due to the continuing imbalance between men and women under the institution of marriage
Men who really have resources
There will be a growing tendency to only find women with equal resources or not to marry directly
Anyway, it is now legal to have a baby out of wedlock
The child is still a normal household registration (the household registration system may be cancelled in the future)
And the workplace damage of marriage and childbirth to women cannot be avoided
In this kind of atmosphere where both men and women feel that getting married and having babies is a great risk to life
The number of people who get married will definitely be at a certain point in time when the consensus is reached
There is a cliff-like decline
yes
It doesn't need to be everyone's awareness
But after reaching a certain percentile
It will become a national consciousness
I can't judge whether this idea and consciousness is right or wrong
But I can predict that it will happen
Highlight data
Number of legally married marriages nationwide:
13.47 million pairs in 2013,
13.067 million pairs in 2014,
12.24 million pairs in 2015,
11,428,000 pairs in 2016
10.591 million pairs in 2017
10,108,000 pairs in 2018
In 2019, 9.471 million pairs
8,143,300 pairs in 2020,
7.643 million pairs in 2021,
6.83 million pairs in 2022
You may think that now that there are fewer babies and fewer marriages, of course, there are fewer marriages.
NONONO!
You know,
Our fertility fell in 2016,
The oldest of them is 8 years old.
That is, the population of marriageable age,
The continent is increasing every year.
The population of marriageable age is increasing every year,
But the number of people married went from 13.47 million to 6.83 million.
Less than half.
On the premise of increasing the number of marriageable ages,
At least last year, the number of marriages had to be 15 million to be normal.
Everybody doesn't get married,
But the baby still needs to be born,
Otherwise, a lot of things in this country will be paralyzed,
Although the base of 1.4 billion is large,
But in 20 years, at least hundreds of millions less,
This can lead to a lot of economic and social problems.
Let's talk about my friends and I imagining the possibilities of the future.
I heard that a friend's friend, both couples have fertility problems, so I found a surrogate, the genes are from these two couples, but the woman did not have the process of pregnancy in October, the baby was born, the woman did not have much maternal love, and she did not like children so much.
This is difficult to evaluate, because her physiology has not gone through the special period when the child is born, develops, and is connected with the child's body and mind, and the secretion of estrogen is insufficient, which is difficult to stimulate maternal love.
From a technical point of view, it is now possible to "make" a child without the involvement of parents at all, take out the two from the sperm bank egg bank, combine them, cultivate them in vitro, and directly produce a new human being, with 100% operability.
Even..
Therefore, even if all of them don't get married and don't have babies, they won't let humanity go extinct.
The woman is worried about the harm of pregnancy to the body, such as the risk of dystocia, such as postpartum recovery, such as body shape, such as other incidental pains, etc., OK, now there is no need to use the body to conceive, and if you want a child, you can directly take the sperm and eggs for in vitro development.
Is this more in line with the current trend of equal rights between men and women?
Everybody doesn't delay everybody,
This kind of still belongs to parents who have their own,
It's just that the way of giving birth has changed.
If everyone doesn't give birth,
And another possibility,
Unified national production?
There are a number of ethical issues that arise,
This new group of humans,
But are there any parents?
What kind of human education should we receive?
Just a bunch of flesh-and-blood robots?
What is the significance of their birth?
What is the mission of being alive?
It's a super complex problem,
But it is not excluded that the world will follow this script.
So this version today
Is there a chance to go back to the way things were?
100% impossible
Unless civilization is destroyed
Everything starts again with an agrarian society
Giving birth to a baby
Everyone can see it clearly
An agrarian society gives birth to a baby and gets a labor force
At the age of 5, you can start working in the fields
There is no so-called rebellious period at the age of 15
In modern society, a baby is born and loses part of its own labor force
Because of the cost of raising up to 18 years old
is enough to be chic for 10 years without having a baby
Anyone can settle the account
It's not that encouraging a few words of inheritance and succession of incense lamps can make people spend so much money
The poor do not dare to live
Born poorer
The rich don't want to give birth
Lost a lot of freedom
Except for going back in time
This question
There is almost no solution
Higher education, the Internet, high material abundance, all these are beautiful things, but they are also all enemies of fertility.
In addition, under the influence of extreme feminist ideas in the West in recent years, the increasing antagonism between men and women has indeed brought a lot of negative effects on marriage and childbirth in society.
Some of the countries with the highest fertility rates in the world
Basically, there are at least three or five children in a family
Congo (annual per capita income of $550)
Mali ($901)
Malawi ($520)
Uganda ($1,000)
Angola ($3,200)
Plus one born in India, which is also declining, has a 2.0 birth rate and a per capita annual income of $2,348.
China's per capita annual income in 2023 is $5,416
In first-tier cities, the average annual income is as high as 9,672 US dollars
Do you envy these countries?
Anyway, I don't envy.
Normal people care about their lives first
Let's focus on the future of humanity
Because of the future world of mankind
Without me
Nor you
I only hope for a lifetime
All live in peace
It is satisfying to make the current world a better place