laitimes

Turbo 3续航,比一加Ace 3V少4分钟?李杰吐槽:游戏性能调度那么怂

author:Said the mobile phone idler

Redmi Turbo 3 battery life has recently attracted a lot of attention, this is a 5000 mAh + 90W fast charging combination, competitors in the same price range OnePlus Ace 3V and realme GT Neo6 SE are 5500 mAh + 100W, Xiaobai evaluation announced the Redmi Turbo 3 three-hour comprehensive battery life test and six hours of comprehensive battery life test.

According to this test, this test includes several items, in the 3-hour comprehensive battery life test, Peace Elite, video playback, video call, Weibo and Douyin consume power together, OnePlus Ace 3V remaining 62%, Redmi Turbo 3 remaining 57%

Turbo 3续航,比一加Ace 3V少4分钟?李杰吐槽:游戏性能调度那么怂

In the six-hour comprehensive battery life test, the three-hour comprehensive Redmi Turbo 3 consumes 43% of power, OnePlus Ace 3V consumes 38% of power, Honor of Kings 1 hour test, Redmi Turbo 3 consumes 26% of power, OnePlus Ace 3V consumes 25% of power, Genshin Impact 1-hour test, Redmi Turbo 3 consumes 28% of power, OnePlus Ace 3V consumes 36% of power, Toutiao and NetEase Cloud Music 1-hour test Redmi Turbo 3 consumes 3% of power, OnePlus Ace 3V consumes 1% of power,,

In this test, the Redmi Turbo 3 persisted in shutting down for 5 hours and 5 minutes, and the OnePlus Ace 3V persisted in shutting down for 5 hours and 9 minutes.

Three-hour comprehensive and 1-hour Glory of Kings 1-hour headlines NetEase applications, OnePlus Ace 3V are more power-efficient than Redmi Turbo 3, mainly in the Genshin Impact 1-hour test, Redmi Turbo 3 consumes 28% of power, OnePlus consumes 36% of power, so that the others add up to 72% of the power consumption of the Redmi Turbo 3, OnePlus Ace 3V and others add up to 64%, the gap between the two sides is 6%, but Genshin Impact alone, the Redmi Turbo 3 consumes 28% of the power, and the OnePlus Ace 3V consumes 36% of the power , so Genshin Impact is the biggest change in this endurance test between the two sides.

Look at this battery life test version, if you don't test Genshin Impact, the gap is estimated to be more than 4 minutes, which is interesting, but the battery life is only a few minutes away, and some people in the comment area refute OnePlus, blowing battery life all day long, 500 mAh difference, how can the battery life only be 4 minutes?

Turbo 3续航,比一加Ace 3V少4分钟?李杰吐槽:游戏性能调度那么怂

OnePlus CEO Li Jie also released his views on battery life today, continuing to complain about Xiaomi, Li Jie is even more direct diss, Li Jie said:

There is a 5000mAh product, which claims that the battery life is worse than the Ace 3V, so of course, the game performance scheduling is so cowardly, if the OnePlus Ace 3V adopts the same scheduling strategy, the battery life performance can far exceed the current results. If you don't play games, for everyday use, the OnePlus Ace 3V can be said to be victorious. You can casually compare and test to see who has better performance release and battery life!

That's interesting.,Specifically.,It seems that everyone has to try it out.,In fact, many people don't play games.,But if the game performance scheduling is stronger.,It will be more enjoyable to play.。

Turbo 3续航,比一加Ace 3V少4分钟?李杰吐槽:游戏性能调度那么怂

OnePlus mobile phone also sent a poster on the importance of battery life, and then Li Jie broke the news that the new products of friends behind him have been changed to more than 5500mAh, you can wait and see. The industry is welcome to follow up on the battery life experience, indicating that the direction is right, and users like long battery life.

It is true that battery life is very important,The mobile phone I use now does not reach5000mAh,It's really inconvenient to use,It's normal to charge two times a day or even more than that,Change your phone in the future,Absolutely have to change5500mAh,Xiaomi will make up for this later,Competitiveness will naturally be strengthened。

Turbo 3续航,比一加Ace 3V少4分钟?李杰吐槽:游戏性能调度那么怂

For the battery life of the mobile phone, what do you have to say, I personally think it is very important, now it is becoming popular 5500mAh + 100W fast charging, I think it is too necessary, I hope several major manufacturers will use it, what do you think!

Read on