Debate: Xiaomi SU7 live broadcast sparked heated discussions
Digital bloggers and automotive bloggers are on display, their rhetoric sparkling and passionate.
They not only represent their own views, but also defend their positions.
In their heated debate, the audience felt as if they were in a real debate arena, and their blood was boiling and emotional.
Xiaomi SU7 Debate: Who is the Real King?
Jin Scissors Unboxing, Chen Zhen and host Li Jieling, the three protagonists each appeared, like three rays of light on the stage, each shining with a unique charm.
As a leader in the digital field, Jin Scissors has always been known for his outspokenness, Chen Zhen is a rising star in the automotive industry, and his words are always sharp, while the moderator, Li Jieling, is known for his calmness and wisdom, like the conductor of the whole debate.
When Jin Scissors opened the box and Chen Zhen started a debate, the audience was shocked to find an astonishing phenomenon -- the gap between the two people's level was so big! Jin Scissors opened the box, with his eloquence and provocative eye, repeatedly criticized Chen Zhen's position and viewpoint, as if he wanted to crush the other party in words.
Chen Zhen, on the other hand, refuted the accusations of Jin Scissors one by one with his calmness and rationality, and armed his position with facts and logic.
When the host Li Jieling tried to mediate the conflict between the two sides, his wisdom and composure played a key role.
He not only reminded and guided both sides in a timely manner, but also maintained a calm and objective stance in the fierce atmosphere of the debate, adding many highlights and highlights to the whole debate.
Logic VS Attack: The Truth of the Debate
Chen Zhen's logical thinking is like a sharpened sword, which accurately pierces the key points of the debate.
The arguments he puts forward are not only solid and credible, but they are like rays of light that go straight to the essence of the problem.
On the stage of debate, he does not need flowery rhetoric, but only needs to use his clear thinking and ironclad logic to break through the opponent's arguments one by one.
Each of his ideas was well thought out, and every sentence was so persuasive that it seemed to be able to easily convince any doubter.
In contrast, the unboxing of Golden Scissors has frequently fallen into a vortex of personal attacks.
His rhetoric, while sharp, often lacks substantial arguments and is somewhat hollow.
During the debate, he constantly made personal attacks on Chen Zhen in an attempt to cover up the inadequacy of his arguments.
This approach will only leave the audience feeling disappointed and resentful.
What they want to see is a high-level debate, not a war of words filled with malicious attacks.
Therefore, the act of unpacking Golden Scissors not only did not win the audience's approval, but made them lower their evaluation of him by a few points.
The digital community reacted: an uproar
Digital bloggers are like a flock of active sparrows, each chirping differently in the brutal arena of this debate.
Their attitudes towards the unboxing of Golden Scissors are diverse, like a colorful picture, showing a rich variety of emotions and opinions.
Some digital bloggers find it difficult to accept, and they are worried that this debate will have a negative impact on the entire digital blogger community.
In their opinion, the remarks and actions of Golden Scissors out of the box have exceeded the bottom line of the industry, and may leave a bad impression on the audience and damage the reputation of the entire industry.
They want to see a high-level debate, not a show of vicious competition, and are therefore critical of the performance of Golden Scissors unboxing.
There are also some digital bloggers who have expressed a change in attitude, believing that the performance of Golden Scissors unboxing has exposed his lack of expertise and loss of neutrality.
In the past, Golden Scissors Unboxing has garnered attention for its outspoken and sharp views, but in this debate, his words and actions have been disappointed and regretted.
They begin to reflect on what qualities and qualities a good digital blogger should have, and how to express their opinions and positions correctly.
This change in attitude shows that digital bloggers pay attention to and think about the development of the industry, and also provides new ideas and directions for the progress of the industry.
Controversy and Reflection: The Birth of a New Term
First of all, Li Nan pointed out that there is an obvious lack of knowledge of the product when Golden Scissors unbox.
As a digital blogger, understanding the product is crucial, and Golden Scissors unboxing has frequently exposed his ignorance of the product in the debate.
His remarks are full of doubts such as "I don't understand the product" and "I don't know anything", which makes people wonder if he really has enough expertise and experience.
More importantly, Li Nan emphasized that the gold scissors unboxing lacks the basic upbringing of equal communication.
In debates, the gold scissors open the box with frequent personal attacks, attacking the character and personality of the opponent, rather than focusing on the essence of the issue.
This practice not only does not conform to the basic norms of debate, but also damages the image of the entire industry and leaves a bad impression on the audience.
The sales myth of the Xiaomi SU7: the other side of the story
There are all sorts of speculations and interpretations about this sales miracle.
Some people believe that this is a consumer's recognition of product quality and a manifestation of trust and support for the Xiaomi brand.
Xiaomi has always been committed to providing consumers with high-quality products and services, and the establishment of this relationship of trust is one of the important reasons why the sales of Xiaomi SU7 have not decreased.
In addition, the influence of the Xiaomi brand in the market is also a factor that cannot be ignored.
As a well-known technology company, Xiaomi has a large user base and fan base, which provides strong support for the promotion and sales of Xiaomi SU7.
The debate continues: a new definition of a digital clown
For Kim Scissors to unbox, this debate may become a shadow in his career, etched deep in his heart.
What was once a glamorous digital blogger is now being questioned and criticized for a gaffe debate.
He may be aware that an act of over-rhetoric and irrational thinking can leave an indelible stain on his career and permanently damage his reputation.
This is undoubtedly a great blow and warning for a gold scissors who has always been full of confidence in unboxing.
At the same time, this event also gave birth to a new term - digital clown.
The emergence of this term has caused people to reflect deeply on the quality and moral bottom line of digital bloggers.
In the past, digital bloggers were often considered to be the best in the industry, with a wealth of expertise and experience, as well as good verbal skills, and were respected and trusted by a wide audience.
The occurrence of such an incident as the unboxing of the golden scissors has made people wonder whether digital bloggers are really as noble as we imagined, and whether their words and deeds are always in line with professional ethics and social morality? These problems have made people question and worry about the overall image of the digital blogger community.
epilogue
The Xiaomi SU7 debate will continue, and digital bloggers will continue to explore the topic.
Although the spark of this debate has been extinguished, the reflections left behind continue to ferment.
Perhaps, we need more logical and responsible digital bloggers to lead the development of this industry.
Because debate is not just about winning the battle of words, but also about promoting the progress and development of the industry.
What do you think about this? Welcome to leave a message in the comment area to discuss
Disclaimer: The picture material comes from the Internet, if there is any infringement, please contact to delete!
Warm reminder, this article is the first work of the original headlines, it is forbidden to move to other platforms within 72 hours, the rights protection function of the whole network has been opened, and the plagiarism porter has complained and reported on the whole network, thank you for your understanding!