Song Gyu-mo's Viewpoint 126: Based on the overall and long-term interests of society, a person should resolutely safeguard his or her reasonable rights
Based on the overall interests and long-term interests of society, a person should resolutely safeguard his or her reasonable rights. This is not only for the need to save oneself, but also for the need to save others, and more importantly, for the need to save society. Needless to say, one's legitimate rights must be upheld. Saving others, why, because others have taken possession of your reasonable rights, it is tantamount to making others bear the name of unrighteousness, and at the same time, it also increases the probability that others will be punished in the future. And if you resolutely defend your reasonable rights, others will not be able to occupy your reasonable rights, and others will not have to bear the name of unrighteousness, and at the same time, it will also reduce the probability of others being punished in the future, which is a good thing for others. Why, because if everyone resolutely defends their reasonable rights, in the end, the society will be clean and upright, and everyone will be a beneficiary in the end, and not only the present generation will benefit as a whole, but also the future generations will benefit as a whole, and in the end, not only the overall welfare level of contemporary society will be greatly improved, but also the overall social welfare level of future generations will also be greatly improved. Tolerance and tolerance should be based on goodness, that is to say, when tolerance is conducive to the improvement of the level of goodness and long-term goodness of the whole society, you can choose to tolerate tolerance. In addition, in a situation where a society is in a prisoner's dilemma, it can be costly for a person to resolutely assert his or her legitimate rights. In this case, the only option based on sub-optimal is to minimize the cost as much as possible. Options such as self-preservation are the next best choice. But Mingzhe is not the best choice after all, because Mingzhe can't protect himself in the end, he can't protect himself, he just slows down the speed of death. It is very difficult to change a society that is trapped in the prisoner's dilemma, and it requires not only huge costs for individuals, but also huge costs for many people, and finally forming a joint advantage to reverse the prisoner's dilemma situation and enter a benign track. Okay, thank you, thank you.
Song Guiwu's opinion 126: Based on the overall and long-term interests of society, one should resolutely safeguard his own legitimate rights
Based on the overall and long-term interests of society, one should resolutely safeguard his own legitimate rights. This is not only to save their own needs, but also to save the needs of others, and even to save the needs of society. To save themselves, it goes without saying that one's legitimate rights must be safeguarded. To save others, why? Because others occupy your legitimate rights, which is equivalent to letting others bear the name of injustice, and at the same time, increasing the probability of others being punished in the future. And you resolutely safeguard your legitimate rights, others cannot occupy your legitimate rights, and others will not have to bear the name of injustice, and at the same time reducing the probability of others being punished in the future, which is good for others. To save society, why? Because if everyone resolutely safeguards his own legitimate rights, eventually, the society will be clean and upright, and everyone will be the beneficiary. Not only the contemporary people as a whole will benefit, but also the future generations as a whole will benefit. Finally, not only the contemporary society's overall welfare level will be greatly improved, but also the future generations' overall welfare level will be greatly improved. Tolerance and tolerance should be based on goodness, that is to say, when you tolerate and tolerate is conducive to the improvement of the overall goodness of the society and the level of goodness in the long run, you can choose tolerance and tolerance. In addition, in a society trapped in the prisoner's dilemma, a person to firmly safeguard their legitimate rights, may cost a lot. In this case, based on the suboptimal choice, can only be as far as possible to achieve the minimum cost. Such as the choice of keeping safe, is the suboptimal choice. But after all, not the optimal choice, because the wise man will not save his life, but only slow down the speed of death. A society trapped in the prisoner's dilemma, it is difficult to change, not only needs a huge cost for individuals, but also needs a lot of people to pay a huge cost, and finally form a net advantage, it may turn the prisoner's dilemma situation into a benign track. OK, thank you, thank you.
