宋圭武觀點126：立足社會整體和長遠利益一個人應堅決維護自己的合理權利
立足社會整體利益和長遠利益考慮，一個人對于自己的合理權利，應堅決維護。這既是為了救自己的需要，也是為了救别人的需要，更是為了救社會的需要。救自己，不用說，自己的合理權利必須維護。救别人，為什麼，因為别人占有了你的合理權利，等于讓别人背了不義的名，同時，也增加了别人在未來時間中受到懲罰的機率。而你堅決維護自己的合理權利，别人也就不能占有你的合理權利，别人也就不用背不義的名，同時也降低了别人在未來時間中受到懲罰的機率，這對别人就是一種好。救社會，為什麼，因為若大家都這樣堅決維護自己的合理權利，最終，社會風清氣正，最終人人都是受益者，而且不僅當代人整體受益，後代人也整體受益，最終不僅當代社會整體福利水準大大提高，而且後代社會福利水準也整體大大提高。忍讓寬容應以善為基礎，也就是說當你忍讓寬容有利于社會整體的善和長遠的善的水準提高時，是可以選擇忍讓寬容的。另外，在一個社會陷入囚徒困境的情況下，一個人要堅決維護自己的合理權利，有可能成本巨大。在這種情況下，基于次優的選擇，隻能是盡可能實作成本最小化。如明哲保身之類的選擇，就是次優選擇。但明哲保身畢竟不是最優的選擇，因為明哲保身最終也明不了哲保不了身，隻是在減緩死亡的速度而已。一個陷入囚徒困境的社會，要改變是很難的，不僅需要個人付出巨大成本，還需要衆多人付出巨大成本，最終形成合力優勢，才可能扭轉囚徒困境局面，進入良性軌道。好，謝謝，謝謝。
Song Guiwu's opinion 126: Based on the overall and long-term interests of society, one should resolutely safeguard his own legitimate rights
Based on the overall and long-term interests of society, one should resolutely safeguard his own legitimate rights.This is not only to save their own needs, but also to save the needs of others, and even to save the needs of society.To save themselves, it goes without saying that one's legitimate rights must be safeguarded.To save others, why? Because others occupy your legitimate rights, which is equivalent to letting others bear the name of injustice, and at the same time, increasing the probability of others being punished in the future.And you resolutely safeguard your legitimate rights, others cannot occupy your legitimate rights, and others will not have to bear the name of injustice, and at the same time reducing the probability of others being punished in the future, which is good for others.To save society, why? Because if everyone resolutely safeguards his own legitimate rights, eventually, the society will be clean and upright, and everyone will be the beneficiary. Not only the contemporary people as a whole will benefit, but also the future generations as a whole will benefit. Finally, not only the contemporary society's overall welfare level will be greatly improved, but also the future generations' overall welfare level will be greatly improved. Tolerance and tolerance should be based on goodness, that is to say, when you tolerate and tolerate is conducive to the improvement of the overall goodness of the society and the level of goodness in the long run, you can choose tolerance and tolerance. In addition, in a society trapped in the prisoner's dilemma, a person to firmly safeguard their legitimate rights, may cost a lot. In this case, based on the suboptimal choice, can only be as far as possible to achieve the minimum cost. Such as the choice of keeping safe, is the suboptimal choice. But after all, not the optimal choice, because the wise man will not save his life, but only slow down the speed of death. A society trapped in the prisoner's dilemma, it is difficult to change, not only needs a huge cost for individuals, but also needs a lot of people to pay a huge cost, and finally form a net advantage, it may turn the prisoner's dilemma situation into a benign track. OK, thank you, thank you.
