宋圭武观点126：立足社会整体和长远利益一个人应坚决维护自己的合理权利
立足社会整体利益和长远利益考虑，一个人对于自己的合理权利，应坚决维护。这既是为了救自己的需要，也是为了救别人的需要，更是为了救社会的需要。救自己，不用说，自己的合理权利必须维护。救别人，为什么，因为别人占有了你的合理权利，等于让别人背了不义的名，同时，也增加了别人在未来时间中受到惩罚的概率。而你坚决维护自己的合理权利，别人也就不能占有你的合理权利，别人也就不用背不义的名，同时也降低了别人在未来时间中受到惩罚的概率，这对别人就是一种好。救社会，为什么，因为若大家都这样坚决维护自己的合理权利，最终，社会风清气正，最终人人都是受益者，而且不仅当代人整体受益，后代人也整体受益，最终不仅当代社会整体福利水平大大提高，而且后代社会福利水平也整体大大提高。忍让宽容应以善为基础，也就是说当你忍让宽容有利于社会整体的善和长远的善的水平提高时，是可以选择忍让宽容的。另外，在一个社会陷入囚徒困境的情况下，一个人要坚决维护自己的合理权利，有可能成本巨大。在这种情况下，基于次优的选择，只能是尽可能实现成本最小化。如明哲保身之类的选择，就是次优选择。但明哲保身毕竟不是最优的选择，因为明哲保身最终也明不了哲保不了身，只是在减缓死亡的速度而已。一个陷入囚徒困境的社会，要改变是很难的，不仅需要个人付出巨大成本，还需要众多人付出巨大成本，最终形成合力优势，才可能扭转囚徒困境局面，进入良性轨道。好，谢谢，谢谢。
Song Guiwu's opinion 126: Based on the overall and long-term interests of society, one should resolutely safeguard his own legitimate rights
Based on the overall and long-term interests of society, one should resolutely safeguard his own legitimate rights.This is not only to save their own needs, but also to save the needs of others, and even to save the needs of society.To save themselves, it goes without saying that one's legitimate rights must be safeguarded.To save others, why? Because others occupy your legitimate rights, which is equivalent to letting others bear the name of injustice, and at the same time, increasing the probability of others being punished in the future.And you resolutely safeguard your legitimate rights, others cannot occupy your legitimate rights, and others will not have to bear the name of injustice, and at the same time reducing the probability of others being punished in the future, which is good for others.To save society, why? Because if everyone resolutely safeguards his own legitimate rights, eventually, the society will be clean and upright, and everyone will be the beneficiary. Not only the contemporary people as a whole will benefit, but also the future generations as a whole will benefit. Finally, not only the contemporary society's overall welfare level will be greatly improved, but also the future generations' overall welfare level will be greatly improved. Tolerance and tolerance should be based on goodness, that is to say, when you tolerate and tolerate is conducive to the improvement of the overall goodness of the society and the level of goodness in the long run, you can choose tolerance and tolerance. In addition, in a society trapped in the prisoner's dilemma, a person to firmly safeguard their legitimate rights, may cost a lot. In this case, based on the suboptimal choice, can only be as far as possible to achieve the minimum cost. Such as the choice of keeping safe, is the suboptimal choice. But after all, not the optimal choice, because the wise man will not save his life, but only slow down the speed of death. A society trapped in the prisoner's dilemma, it is difficult to change, not only needs a huge cost for individuals, but also needs a lot of people to pay a huge cost, and finally form a net advantage, it may turn the prisoner's dilemma situation into a benign track. OK, thank you, thank you.
