#我来唠家常#
Several recent Spring Festival movies can be said to be in full swing, in addition to the popularity of "Hot and Hot" driven by Jia Ling's 100 pounds, and Shen Teng's "Flying Life 2" is comparable to it.
Zhao Liying's "Article 20" and children's favorite "Bear Infested" are also the sweets of major theaters.
It's just a pity that Andy Lau's "Mr. Red Carpet", its film schedule is slightly worse, and the box office is not as good as several other movies.
has now withdrawn from the Spring Festival stalls, which even makes netizens doubt Andy Lau's box office appeal.
Jia Ling, as a loyal fan of Andy Lau, only cared about promoting her own movie, and did not help Liu Tianwang promote it.
The popularity of major movies, and people are naturally indispensable on social media to take photos after watching the movies and discuss the plot.
Other netizens posted clips and stills, but they didn't cause any sensation.
It's just that a few stills taken by a singer when watching the movie were alluded to by the movie channel financial media that he was "stealing shots".
Xue Zhiqian fell into the "theft door"
On February 15, singer Xue Zhiqian posted a post on Weibo about his feelings after watching the movie "Flying Life 2", a long article, with several stills from the movie.
I basically don't chase stars for people my age, and I've only heard of Xue Zhiqian, and I know that there is such a person, but I don't know much about it.
It wasn't until I read this long story that I had a new understanding of him.
It is clear from his writings that he is a sincere, non-hypocritical person.
explained at the beginning that he missed the premiere of "Flying Spur 2" for other reasons, and then joked that he might be afraid of embarrassment.
I'm afraid that the movie will be too bad, and he will be embarrassed to do some acts against his will.
In just a few words, Xue Zhiqian's straightforward personality was revealed. Almost no second celebrity dares to post like this on social platforms.
The relationship between friends in the celebrity circle is more about using each other, you help me forward and promote, I will help you forward and promote, only say what is good, not the truth. The face project is particularly well done, and the acting skills when performing "Deep Friendship" are better than when filming.
But Xue Zhiqian is different, he dares to tell the truth, a good movie is good, and a bad movie is bad.
When he encounters bad bad movies, he will also complain and spit fragrant.
can look back at the after-viewing feelings of Xue Zhiqian's "Flying Gallop 2", and the truth is revealed.
wrote about his true feelings in his heart, and looking at the feeling of watching the movie that he described, I wanted to buy a ticket to watch it.
I want to experience what it's like to be "crying with blood" when he says it.
I want to experience whether after watching this movie will be as excited as he said he will be so hard to pick his toes?
I also want to see how good the movie is without him scolding and walking out of the cinema?
I watched "Flying Race 1", and I think it's okay, I can watch it. Xue Zhiqian said that this movie is better and more enjoyable than "Flying Gallop 1", and he also said that his "dog mouth" is difficult to buy with dark coins, and he doesn't like flattery, I believe it.
So I decided to trust him and see the movie.
It is precisely because of such a sincere feeling after watching that Xue Zhiqian was pushed to the "thief door".
Xue Zhiqian posted two Weibo posts in a row to "mock" the theft of photography.
Just as Xue Zhiqian said: Words are murderous weapons! They can spread good and breed evil.
Don't underestimate this little text, the lethality is huge!
The movie channel Rong Media Center alluded to Xue Zhiqian's public release of the photos on the screen of the movie screen as an act of "stealing photos".
and accompanied the program of "Today's Film Review" many years ago, saying that it is necessary to popularize the law in theaters.
In the video, the host asked four questions:
- Is shooting a feature film in a movie theater a pirate?
- Is shooting movie eggs in the cinema a stolen shot?
- Is it a steal to take photos while watching a movie and send them to Moments?
- I only shoot in the cinema and don't spread the above content, is it piracy?
There is no doubt that these are all theft!
It is also pointed out that Article 31 of the Film Industry Promotion Law clearly stipulates that no one may make audio or video recordings of films being screened without the permission of the right holder. Where audio or video recordings are discovered, the cinema staff have the right to stop them and request them to delete them: those who refuse to obey have the right to ask them to leave the venue.
The host said that in fact, when the dragon mark is lit up, we can no longer take out our mobile phones to shoot.
He also said that the movie ticket we purchased was just a single movie-watching experience service, not that we could shoot the content of the movie and disseminate it after buying a movie ticket.
If you just like movies or want to help promote movies, you can send official promotional materials, which will not involve infringement issues.
It was also pointed out that if everyone thinks that only one frame of the picture will not affect the whole movie, what if one person shoots one frame?
If there are enough photos, it will actually constitute a leak of the content of the film.
CCTV News consulted experts on the issue of "piracy".
Experts said that there is no such thing as piracy in the law, and it should be a term for copyright infringement.
The photos taken by Xue Zhiqian when watching the film are actually evaluating the work, which is the feeling after viewing, and should fall within the scope of fair use in the Copyright Law.
This means that if we use fair use, it does not constitute infringement, but how can this fair use be identified?
Experts explain that personal appreciation, research or teaching are all within the scope of fair use.
Reviews or reviews also fall under the scope of fair use.
However, it is not possible to copy the entire film and shoot and disseminate it, or to exceed the length of fair use, for example, more than 50% of the film does not fall within the scope of fair use.
If the highlights are only copied and filmed and disseminated, without the permission of the rights holder, this does not fall within the scope of fair use.
Now everyone understands, right?
All in all, in short, if he wasn't sent by Xue Zhiqian, then there would be nothing. But he is Xue Zhiqian and a public figure, so any of his pictures will cause controversy.
As for the "theft of photos", it is just a matter of taking a few photos, and the crime is a bit big.
If taking a photo is a stolen photo, it is recommended that the theater stipulate that you should not bring mobile phones and other equipment when watching movies in the future, and those who refuse to hand in are prohibited from watching movies.
What do you think of "stealing photos"?