Here's what the whole picture should look like:
A group of Chinese in the United Kingdom accepted the commission of a domestic agency to shoot a group of video content, because the video was released around the Spring Festival, so it could not be exposed in advance, and the two parties also signed a confidentiality agreement.
After pre-planning, the group of Chinese wanted to shoot the video at King's Cross St Pancras Station in London, and planned to use the public piano.
On the day of filming, the participants rushed to the train station one after another. Two of them (Lady A in Red and Male C) arrived first, but unfortunately, the British pianist DR K, who has been engaged in webcasting, happened to be using the piano and broadcasting it live.
What's even more unfortunate is that there should be another Japanese team who wanted to shoot at this train station that day. Its business partner, JIM, was the first to arrive at the train station and participated in the live broadcast of DR K, where JIM not only played a song, but also communicated with DR K, revealing that a Japanese team would come to produce the show that day.
At this time, DR K saw Female A and Male C, and it was estimated that he couldn't tell the Asian faces clearly, and he had a preconceived idea of JIM's information, so he asked if the two were Japanese, and the two sides communicated very cordially. Due to the needs of live broadcasting, DR K even successfully invited male C to play a song live.
Note that the live broadcast of male C and female A is the "fuse" of the subsequent incident.
Moreover, Male C and Female A clearly knew that DR K was broadcasting, but they probably forgot or were not notified that there was a confidentiality agreement, or they didn't really take it seriously, otherwise they would not cooperate with DR K's live broadcast, especially Male C's live performance.
Subsequently, the participants arrived one after another, especially Male D (that is, the person who lost his temper in the video) and Female B (round-faced female). At this point, all the main characters are present.
While the Chinese team was waiting for the "right to use the public piano", they learned that DR K was playing in the live broadcast, especially the male C, who had played on camera before, which may have violated the confidentiality agreement, and thus launched the next climactic "plot".
The appeal of the Chinese team is actually very simple, that is, I hope that DR K will not release this video in the future, or there will be some processing measures such as coding, in short, the "portraits" of male C and female A cannot be disclosed.
But the real problem next is that because of the fact that the English ability is really anxious, the communication from the beginning of the female B has deviated, because the expression is not clear, and the female B has not fully expressed the confidentiality agreement and the content that she hopes for the other party's cooperation, DR K mistakenly thinks that the other party thinks that he is "not allowed" to shoot publicly.
And the next female B and male D appeared and communicated, and they were completely off track. Originally, it was to reach a negotiation to cooperate with the "coding" governance, but it became a dispute between the two sides about the "portrait right to appear in public places", and even because of the gaffe of male D, the exchange was completely out of control.
This is also the reason why the relevant video made the whole world "confused" at the beginning, because I really don't know what the real reason for the quarrel between the two sides is. To what extent will the two parties be idle, they will directly tear up on the spot just for the issue of "portrait rights in public places".
Including DR K, in fact, he was actually "confused" in the process, because the Chinese team did not express the situation and demands clearly at the beginning, and later inadvertently deviated, resulting in him not getting the other party's demands at all on the spot, but instead decided that the other party "did not allow" him to broadcast live, and did not understand the other party's "why don't you go away by yourself if you don't want to be on camera", and later even triggered the understanding of freedom of speech, this is not Commi China, etc., which has nothing to do with this incident at all.
Therefore, this controversy is actually just a "chicken and duck talk" caused by language proficiency problems, and the two sides seem to have communicated, but in fact it is a complete exchange of loneliness. If we want to discuss the "exchange of Chinese and Western civilizations" on this basis, I am afraid that it is purely an over-interpretation.
Later, the intervention of the local police was also very interesting, in fact, the communication between the policewoman and DR K did not go to any substantive stage at all, DR K was not clear about the demands of the Chinese team until this time, but because of the quarrel and the police, he thought that the other party was accusing him of racial discrimination, sexual harassment, etc., so he strongly opposed the policewoman's request to let him turn off the live broadcast, and the policewoman could only suspend the communication under his strong self-protection.
Judging from the dispersal of the police, the Chinese team, and DR K in the end, it is estimated that the Chinese team and the police have made the situation clear, but at this time, if you want DR K to cooperate, it is obviously impossible to cooperate at the legal or human level, and it can only be temporarily ended.
But the problem is that DR K is an "old fritter" who is proficient in traffic passwords, and it is strange that he does not publish this live video again.
And since then, the matter has been completely exposed and popular. Because the relevant videos do not involve or even understand the real reasons for this controversy, they show inexplicable, deliberate disturbances and even porcelain encounters, coupled with the inherent stereotypes of the East and the West, which have led to even more marginal discussions such as racial discrimination and freedom of speech.
After understanding the whole picture, I can only say: even if the communication between China and the West is destined to have a long way to go and many difficulties, but the language is not good and the communication ability is problematic, isn't it destined to "talk with chickens and ducks"!
And when we evaluate things, it is best to find out the truth first, and then talk about things on a case-by-case basis, rather than everything can involve the country, race, speech, democracy, national character and other big aspects, because there are some things that really don't deserve this weight!