#来点儿干货#
Global Network reported that on January 19, local time, two committees of the U.S. Congress sent a letter to the Swiss industrial group ABB on the grounds of "security threats and risks", asking it to explain its business dealings with Chinese state-owned enterprises while cooperating with U.S. government agencies, and also specifically mentioned that ABB applied the software and technology used in Shanghai Zhenhua Heavy Industries container cranes at U.S. seaports. The meaning of this move by the United States is obvious, it is an attempt to interfere in the cooperation between Chinese companies and Swiss ABB enterprises.
In this regard, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Wang Wenbin refuted it, saying that the paranoia of US politicians being killed has become more and more serious. Wang Wenbin then issued three rhetorical questions, asking why US politicians can keep accusing Chinese companies of posing a so-called "threat" to US national security without any evidence? Why do such threats frequently occur to China's leading enterprises in various industries? Why is it that only the United States feels the threat posed by Chinese companies?
It may seem complicated to explain this series of reasons, but it can be summed up well in one sentence. For example, Wang Wenbin hit the nail on the head and said that for the United States, China is advanced and threatened. Only Chinese exports of shirts and socks do not pose a threat to the United States.
Wang Wenbin's words really show the fundamental reason why the United States frequently suppresses Chinese companies, that is, they are afraid of the rise of Chinese enterprises and the rapid development of China's economy, because these will threaten the world status of the United States. After all, in the eyes of the United States, under the Western concept of civilization, there is no win-win situation in the world, and China's rise will inevitably lead to the decline of the United States.
From the beginning, it was accused that China's Huawei terminal equipment had a so-called "back door", which was a security risk. Later, he accused China's cranes of having a "Trojan virus" to collect information, and then threatened China's electric vehicles and threatened the national security of the United States, and the United States began to use the so-called "national security" to suppress Chinese companies in more and more fields. As far as the United States is concerned, if the Chinese enterprises develop well, they will seize the market share of similar enterprises in the United States, and that is a threat, and all measures must be taken to suppress it. Not to mention fair competition in a head-to-head match.
Behind this logic, in essence, the United States does not want China to achieve industrial upgrading, China can develop, but can only develop in the direction planned by the United States, China can also rise, but can not challenge the global hegemony and interests of the United States, China had better continue to contribute to the better life of the United States and the West in the position of "world factory".
In a word, Americans cannot see the good of Chinese, let alone the challenge of the status of the United States, and Obama has said that if China develops, it will be a disaster for the West. Because in the concept of the United States and the West, the world cake is only so big, and with China's 1.4 billion people, the United States and the West will share much less, and they have never thought of making the world cake bigger, so that everyone can achieve a win-win situation.
In this regard, since the Obama administration proposed the "Asia-Pacific rebalance" strategy, the United States' strategic focus began to shift eastward, and now 10 years later, 60% of the United States' global military strength is being deployed to the Asia-Pacific region, and the United States is making every effort to contain China and suppress China's development.
There has always been a view that China's economic rise has challenged the United States, and whenever a country's GDP reaches or exceeds 70% of the total GDP of the United States, it will inevitably be encircled and suppressed by the United States, such as the former Soviet Union and Japan. This statement is generally not wrong, but it does not point out the essence of the problem. The essence of the problem is that the way China rises is completely different from the way the West has set up development.
Under the Western order headed by the United States, the development model has been set for all countries, and the Western system is still continued, which leads to the fact that according to this way of development, it is impossible to catch up with the European and American countries that have been leading for hundreds of years in any case, and in the end they can only become economic colonies of the United States and the West, and the United States and the West exchange high value-added products for other countries' low-value-added industrial products and agricultural products, which is one of the fundamental reasons for ensuring that the United States and Western countries maintain a high welfare society.
The rise of China has brought a new development model to the world, through one or two generations to complete the original capital accumulation, thereby promoting the rapid industrialization of the country, and then promoting the modernization and digitalization of the country, and completing the social changes that the West took 200 years or more to complete in just a few decades.
Once this development model is copied by other countries, the system and logic of the United States and Western countries will completely collapse, and their high-welfare society will be quickly squeezed by late-developing countries, and they will no longer be able to live a good life where they can make money lying down. From the perspective of China's rise path, the United States cannot use the dollar and financial hegemony to remotely control China's economic development, so the impact of China's development model on the United States is far greater than the impact of China's rise on the United States.
Therefore, the United States will do everything possible to suppress China, just to "set rules" for the world and spread a truth to all countries: There is no way out and no future to learn from China, and it is better to obediently continue to move forward according to the path they have delineated.