There is no pain in "euthanasia"? Don't look at it very peacefully, but it is more painful than you can imagine
(Information source: "Can't Ignore Euthanasia" Legal Network)
The discussion of euthanasia has never stopped in modern society, and this topic has caused heated debate in many regions and countries. Although only a few countries around the world endorse this practice, most places still oppose it.
There are many different views on euthanasia, and some interpret it as a positive action that means that the doctor takes an active measure to end the patient's life with the patient's consent, such as by injecting a lethal drug.
Others see it as a more passive approach, in which all life-support measures, such as oxygen or respirators, are stopped, and they die naturally. This issue involves many moral, legal and emotional aspects, making euthanasia the focus of attention.
For many patients with incurable diseases, the treatment process is lengthy and expensive. To make matters worse, the pain of many treatments is unbearable, seriously affecting their quality of life.
And those who do not need immediate treatment but suffer for a long time due to the disease not only endure constant pain, but also face the resulting significant mental stress and possibly more physical health problems.
However, the decision to implement euthanasia is not straightforward, as it faces many ethical and social issues. For example, doctors do not have sufficient power or responsibility for deciding to end their lives. This can lead to the public misunderstanding that it was a deliberate or reckless act of killing.
At the same time, it is also difficult to balance the patient's own wishes with the emotional needs of the family. How to take care of the emotions of family members while ensuring the autonomy of patients has become an important issue that must be faced in the practice of euthanasia.
Considering China's national conditions, there are various factors behind the practice of banning euthanasia. The first is that it may be difficult to determine the voluntary nature of the patient's choice, which involves the determination of the nature and extent of the crime.
Secondly, the pressure of public opinion and the possibility of hindering the progress of medicine are things that legislators must consider when making decisions.
In conclusion, the current legal and moral concepts pose many challenges to euthanasia. Each local law and policy is unique, so the discussion of euthanasia must be deeply considered and considered in their respective cultural and environmental contexts.
