laitimes

In ancient times, the secret possession of armor in the home could become "evidence" of rebellion? It may lead to death

author:History at your fingertips

Imagine if you suddenly had a few sets of ancient armor in your home, wouldn't it be cool? But in ancient times, this was not a good thing! Because it could mean that you were suspected of rebellion! Yes, you heard it right, having armor at home can be "evidence" of rebellion? Today, let's uncover this mysterious historical phenomenon together!

In ancient times, the secret possession of armor in the home could become "evidence" of rebellion? It may lead to death

In ancient times, armor was a symbol of military power, which only the military and nobles could have. If you are a commoner, but you suddenly have armor at home, it is really "innocent of guilt, but guilty". Not only will others be jealous of you, but they may also wonder if your armor is coming from the wrong way and if there is some ulterior motives.

During the Tang Dynasty, a wealthy merchant named Li Qing was accused of rebellion because his home was found to be hiding dozens of sets of fine armor. Although Li Qing argued that the armor was intended as a collector's item, he ultimately failed to escape his conviction. His family property was confiscated and his family members were implicated, a case that caused a great sensation at the time and also reflected the taboo of armor in ancient society.

The political scene in ancient times was unpredictable, and rebellion became commonplace. The thirst for power in power is endless, and military equipment such as armor has become an important tool for them to compete for power. If you have armor at home, others will inevitably wonder if you are also ambitious and want a piece of the pie. In this case, the armor becomes the "evidence" of your rebellion.

In ancient times, the secret possession of armor in the home could become "evidence" of rebellion? It may lead to death

In order to maintain social stability, the ancient government had very strict control over military equipment. Private ownership of armor is tantamount to challenging the authority of the government. So, if you accidentally hide a few sets of armor at home, it's a big taboo. The government will not sit idly by and put the hat of rebellion on you, and it will be light.

Armor was also a status symbol in ancient times. Only those powerful and noble families could afford such luxuries. If you are a flat-headed commoner, but you have armor at home, it is really "innocent of guilt, but guilty". Not only will others be jealous of you, but they may also wonder if your armor is coming from the wrong way and if there is some ulterior motives.

In addition to the above reasons, there was a strict social hierarchy in ancient times. Under this system, different classes have different duties and obligations. The duties of ordinary people are farming, paying taxes, and serving in the military, and having armor means that you have an attempt to transcend your social status. This was absolutely intolerable in ancient times.

In addition, in ancient times, the management of weapons was very strict. The government prohibits the manufacture, sale, and collection of weapons by private individuals. Armor, as an important military equipment, is naturally also prohibited. If you have armor in your home, you are likely to be accused of illegally manufacturing, trading, or possessing weapons, and thus considered a rebel.

In ancient times, the secret possession of armor in the home could become "evidence" of rebellion? It may lead to death

In ancient times, rebellion was a serious crime. If you are accused of rebellion, then you may be in danger of having your home raided and exterminated. Therefore, in order to avoid this danger, even if you have armor at home, you can only hide it secretly and not let others know.

However, there are some special circumstances in which having armor in the home may also be considered a proper act. For example, in times of war, the government may need to mobilize the power of the private sector to resist foreign enemies. In this case, if you have armor at home, then you may be drafted into the army and become a soldier in the government.

In ancient times, armor in the family would be regarded as rebellion, and behind this was actually a series of complex social and political factors. From military power and political struggles to social stability and status symbols, armor was a sensitive object in ancient times. It's not just a self-defense tool, it's a double-edged sword that can get you in trouble if you're not careful.

By understanding the historical phenomenon of armor in ancient times being regarded as rebellion, we can gain a deeper understanding of the complexity and diversity of ancient societies. This also helps us to better understand the development of ancient history, so as to provide useful reference and enlightenment for the development of contemporary society.

Read on