Since 2014, Zhangzidao has repeatedly become the focus of news due to incidents such as "scallops ran away" and "scallops starved to death", causing shock to shareholders and market turmoil. Recently, the incident ushered in an important turning point: the former chairman Wu Hougang was sentenced to 15 years in prison and fined 920,000 yuan for multiple crimes. This verdict has sparked widespread discussion and heated discussions on the Internet.
Who will compensate for the loss of shareholders?
Some people are concerned about the loss of shareholders. Many investors have suffered financial losses because of the Zhangzidao problem, and they are confused and anxious about how to get compensation. This has led to discussions about the integrity of listed companies and investor protection mechanisms.
The amount of the fine is too small
Controversy over the amount of the fine has also become a hot topic. Some netizens believe that the fine of 920,000 yuan is too light compared to the huge economic losses and social impact caused by Wu Hougang and the company. This reflects public concern about the cost of crime and the severity of legal sanctions.
The cost of crime is too low
At the same time, there are voices pointing out that the current legal system may make the cost of some violations too low. According to this view, the low-cost criminal environment may encourage wrongdoing and need to be curbed by strengthening legal sanctions.
Late justice
Some netizens expressed their views on "late justice". They argue that despite the eventual legal verdict, justice has come too late for the affected investors.
Trade-offs between benefits and risks
The comparison of Wu Hougang's 15-year sentence with the proceeds of crime has also sparked discussion among some people. They believe that such a sentence may be "worthwhile" for Wu Hougang and his company relative to the benefits obtained by Wu Hougang and his company through illegal means.
"The scallops ran away, but the chairman couldn't run away"
Finally, the saying that "the scallops ran away, but the chairman couldn't run away" also circulated on the Internet. This sentence not only reflects the irony of the incident, but also emphasizes the principle of equality before the law.
The latest developments in the "scallop run" case have sparked public concern and discussion on various issues such as stock market integrity, legal sanctions, the cost of crime, and the protection of investors' rights and interests. This case is not only the end of a specific event, but also an in-depth reflection on the operation of China's capital market and legal system. These discussions are of great significance for promoting the improvement of the legal system and the healthy development of the capital market.