Gree is in trouble? It is rumored on the Internet that he lost the lawsuit against Oaks, and the compensation is as high as 58.49 million yuan.
■ Court battles
Recently, a news about the judgment of the infringement dispute between Gree Electric Appliances and Oaks Company has aroused heated discussions. According to the first-instance judgment released by an intermediate people's court on the Internet, Oaks demanded that the defendant Gree Company compensate a total of 39.9617 million yuan and 33.32 million yuan for economic losses and reasonable rights protection expenses on the grounds that Gree infringed its compressor invention patent, with a total compensation amount of 58.49 million yuan.
However, Gree issued a statement on December 27 accusing the media of spreading unverified false information. What's going on?
■ Litigation disputes
According to the lawsuit filed by Oaks, Gree Electric is accused of infringing its compressor invention patent. Oakes demanded compensation from Gree for economic losses and rights protection expenses, with a total compensation amount of 58.49 million yuan. This huge compensation has sparked widespread speculation and concern in public opinion.
■ Gree clarifies the statement
However, Gree issued a clarification statement on December 27. The statement said that some media and platforms failed to fulfill their verification obligations and published false information, which seriously infringed on the legitimate rights and interests of Gree. The statement requires relevant platforms and media to clarify false statements in a timely manner and eliminate adverse effects. Gree Electric said it would reserve the right to pursue legal responsibility.
■ Public opinion turmoil
For a long time, disputes between Gree Electric and Oaks have existed. As bystanders, we don't want to get too involved in the debate about who is right and who is wrong, but it is important that we are able to look at the dispute rationally. Unsubstantiated false statements may adversely affect both Gree Electric and Oaks. At this juncture, we should stop spreading unverified information so as not to amplify misleading and negative effects.
■ Uncover the truth
In this infringement dispute, we need more evidence and information to confirm the truth. Regarding Oakes' accusations, Gree has stated that it will take appropriate legal measures to protect its rights and interests. Regardless of the final verdict, we hope that justice and reasonableness will be upheld. As consumers, we are eager to see more innovative products and technologies, and this requires fair competition between companies and the protection of intellectual property rights.
■ Conclusion
In this contentious case, we should maintain an objective and rational attitude. Don't over-spread and believe in the speculation and negative effects of false statements without hard evidence, believing that the results of clarifying the truth will appear.
Previous Articles:
Shanghai's life expectancy ranks first in the country, which is inseparable from the following five reasons!
A big city is not the same as a metropolis, so why does Shanghai sit on the throne of China's largest metropolis?
6 million to buy a house can only be bought in the outer ring/outside the outer ring?3 pictures to decipher the secret of Shanghai's housing prices