Before reading this article, click "Follow" in the upper right corner, which is not only convenient for you to discuss and share, but also can bring you a different sense of participation, thank you for your support!
- Source: 3D Earth Knowledge Bureau
- Author/3D Earth Knowledge Bureau
You may think this is a ridiculous question, but in fact, this is what some national leaders really do when they go abroad.
In order to protect their biological information and health, they do not hesitate to take extreme measures to have agents collect and destroy their excrement to prevent it from being used by hostile forces.
Behind this seemingly bizarre behavior is actually the deep logic of national security and intelligence warfare.
The leader's excrement may seem insignificant, but it actually contains a lot of personal information, such as DNA, blood type, diet Xi habits, health status, etc.
This information is an invaluable resource for intelligence agencies to analyze the physical condition, psychological state, political leanings, etc. of the leader.
Through the testing of excrement, intelligence agencies can spy on whether the leader is suffering from certain diseases, whether he is taking certain drugs, whether he is under certain pressures, etc.
This information can help intelligence agencies develop strategies or actions such as spreading false news, spreading rumors, and launching assassinations.
In addition to this, the DNA information of the leader may also be used to carry out some ulterior experiments or attacks. For example, using gene editing technology, it is possible to create biological weapons that target specific individuals or groups, such as viruses, bacteria, toxins, etc.
The danger of this weapon is that it can quietly work and cause fatal injuries without arousing any suspicion.
Another possibility is the use of cloning technology, which can create doubles or puppets that closely resemble the leader for the purpose of deception or control.
Therefore, the excrement of leaders is not only related to personal privacy, but also to national security and stability. If this information is obtained or misused by hostile forces, it can lead to a serious crisis or disaster for the country.
As a result, some leaders consider their excrement to be a state secret and take various measures to protect and destroy it.
According to media reports, several state leaders bring special agents to collect and destroy their excrement when they go abroad.
The most famous example of this is Russian President Vladimir Putin. As an experienced former intelligence officer, Putin is well aware of the means and needs of intelligence agencies.
He understood that his excrement could become a target and a weapon for intelligence agencies. Therefore, when he travels, he will bring professional equipment and personnel to ensure that his excrement does not fall into the hands of others.
These efforts are carried out very covertly and quickly, often undetected by local intelligence agencies.
In addition to Putin, the leaders of a number of other countries have done something similar. For example, North Korea's supreme leader, Kim Jong-un, also brought a special toilet cart with him when he visited China in 2018 to prevent his own excrement from being stolen or analyzed.
Another example is former US President Donald Trump, who also had agents collect and destroy his excrement during a visit to the UK in 2019 to prevent it from being used by British intelligence agencies.
These examples show that the leaders of different countries are highly vigilant and secretive about their bioinformation.
This practice of treating the excrement of leaders as a state secret is not new in recent years. In fact, it has quite a long history, dating back to the last century.
During the Cold War, there was a fierce intelligence competition between the two superpowers, the United States and the Soviet Union, and the excrement of their leaders became one of their targets.
At that time, the CIA used the sewer system of the Soviet embassy in the United States to collect the excrement of Soviet leaders Nikita Khrushchev and Brezhnev and send it to a laboratory for testing.
In this way, the CIA learned that Khrushchev was suffering from diabetes and other diseases, and accordingly developed a corresponding diplomatic strategy.
In addition to the intelligence war between the United States and the Soviet Union, a number of other countries have also used or attempted to use the excrement of their leaders for intelligence gathering or analysis.
For example, during the funeral of King Hussein of Jordan in 1990, Israel's intelligence agency, the Mossad, quietly obtained the excrement of Syrian leader Al-Assad Sr., and found that he had cancer and other diseases through laboratory tests.
This message allowed Israel to prepare in advance for the transition of power in Syria. Another example is an attempt by Iranian intelligence agencies to obtain excrement from former Iraqi President Saddam Hussein.
and through genetic analysis, he was able to create a biological weapon against his individual. However, this plan was not successfully implemented in the end.
While it may seem effective and necessary to treat the excrement of leaders as a state secret and to take protective measures, there are also risks and challenges.
First of all, this practice may cause questions and criticism from the public and the media. Some may see this as an overly defensive or even paranoid act.
They may question whether the leader has some ulterior secrets or problems that require such care to hide their excrement.
They may feel that this is an undermine to public transparency and trust, and a violation of democracy and human rights.
They may ask leaders to disclose their excrement in order to prove their innocence and integrity. These doubts and criticisms can cause unnecessary stress and distress to leaders, affecting their image and reputation.
Such an approach could be undermined and interfered with by hostile forces. Some hostile forces may use various means to try to break through the protective measures of their leaders and obtain or tamper with their excrement.
For example, they may use espionage, hacking, bribery, etc., to infiltrate leaders' residences or hotels to steal or contaminate their excrement.
Alternatively, they may use disguise, deception, threats, etc., to impersonate the leader's agents or staff to collect or replace their excrement. These sabotages and interferences can be seriously harmful or misleading to leaders.
There may be technical and legal challenges. As technology advances, intelligence agencies may have more advanced and covert means of collecting and analyzing the excrement of their leaders.
For example, they may use devices such as tiny cameras, sensors, drones, etc., to monitor and track leaders' movements and excrement.
Alternatively, they may use technologies such as artificial intelligence, big data, and cloud computing to accelerate and optimize the testing and interpretation of leaders' excreta.
These techniques can render leaders' protections ineffective or outdated. On the other hand, different countries and regions may have different legal provisions and ethical standards regarding the collection and destruction of excrement of leaders.
For example, some countries or regions may prohibit or restrict leaders from bringing specialized toilet vans or equipment to prevent environmental or public health impacts.
Alternatively, some countries or regions may require or guarantee the disclosure or sharing of leaders' excreta in order to promote scientific research or social progress.
These legal provisions and ethical standards may conflict or contradict the protective measures of the leaders.
Treating the excrement of leaders as a state secret and taking protective measures is a seemingly outlandish, but plausible approach.
It involves a number of aspects such as the personal privacy and security of leaders, the interests and stability of the country, and the innovation and development of intelligence agencies.
While there are some risks and challenges, its impact and significance cannot be ignored. In the future, with the advancement of science and technology and social changes, this practice may have more changes and developments, which is worthy of our continued attention and consideration.
What are your thoughts on this topic? Feel free to share your thoughts in the comments section.
Finally, due to the rules of the platform, you will only be considered a fan if you interact with me more. If you like my articles, you can click "Follow" and receive the article push as soon as you become a fan.